Displaying 20 results from an estimated 7000 matches similar to: "ctrl -c while executing --progress --size-only --partial results in unhidden but incomplete file"
2023 Jun 07
1
[External] Re: ctrl -c while executing --progress --size-only --partial results in unhidden but incomplete file
Rsync has no memory of what other instances of rsync have done in the
past. An existing file with a different name is of no interest to it
unless --delete in which case it would be deleted. Maybe what you
really want is --partial-dir?
On 6/7/23 16:17, Lacey, Nathan wrote:
> I'm suggesting a partial file that isn't hidden is worse.
> Because any other app looking at the file
2016 Jun 24
2
--partial not working?
Hi Kevin,
I haven't specified --whole-file. After entering an rsync command the terminal always reads "delta-transmission disabled for local transfer or --whole-file" but I assume that is just a standard phrase that always appears.
So, if I am running partial (-P) and not using --whole-file or disabling the delta-transmission, why would an incomplete file be deleted and the
2016 Jun 24
2
--partial not working?
Hello,
I’m running rsync -avPhi to move large video files to a remote server. Often we have to stop a transfer midway through to push something else to the server. My hope was that the -P flag would invoke --partial and the transfer would pick-up where it left off. This does not seem to be happening. Rather, the transfer starts over from the beginning, erasing the partially transferred file.
2016 Jun 24
2
--partial not working?
Hi Kevin,
I'm not a systems manager so my apologies if I'm a little lost here. I'm an audiovisual conservator/archivist and I use rsync for transferring files, a lot.
Yes, I connect to the server and then it shows up as a disk on my desktop and I run rsync between the external drive mounted on my computer and the now mounted server. So, this would be a local copy? And, therefore,
2013 Apr 17
2
(--delay-updates and --partial) re-hashing the already downloaded files?
I am backing up a LARGE data set, over a very unstable internet connection.
I NEED to --delay-updates, because I do a flash cut-over once everything
has transferred.
Yes I know --copy-dest does this, but if the connection breaks,
anything that's already made it over gets put into place (not what I want),
I need it to go from beginning to end, And then I handle the files
seperately.
If I
2007 Mar 16
3
Unhidden predict methods
Hi,
I've noted that not all `predict' methods are hidden in the namespace:
> methods("predict")
[1] predict.ar* predict.Arima*
[3] predict.arima0* predict.glm
[5] predict.HoltWinters* predict.lm
[7] predict.loess* predict.mlm
[9] predict.nls* predict.poly
[11] predict.ppr* predict.prcomp*
[13]
2012 Jan 18
2
rsync overall progress patch
Hi everyone,
I'm trying to implement calculation of overall progress for rsync.
Currently it shows progress only on per file basis.
So I need for the feature size of all files to be synced -
this is obvious and already exists in the code.
I can calculate size of transferred files,
but I can't find the piece of code that is responsible for
calculation of checksums. I don't understand
2017 Nov 26
3
Solution for rsync overall progress data display
Hello,
I looking for a solution to display overall rsync progress on an LCD
display as a bargraph.
I have found 2 parameters:
--progress
This option tells rsync to print information
showing the
progress of the transfer. This gives a bored user
something to
watch. Implies --verbose if it wasn't already specified.
2016 Jun 28
2
--partial not working?
On Fri 24 Jun 2016, Kevin Korb wrote:
> Again, --partial only means don't delete the incomplete file if rsync is
> aborted. Normally rsync will delete the incomplete file so you don't
> have bogus files laying around.
>
> When you rsync to or from a network mount to rsync that is a local copy.
> To use rsync over the network either your source or your target would
2015 Apr 14
1
The --inplace is very different from the behaviour of --partial when resuming a complex case transfer.
Hi all,
>From the manpage of rsync, I can see the following descriptions:
--inplace
The option implies --partial (since an interrupted transfer does
not delete the file)
So I do the following testings on the `--inplace' and `--partial' for
resuming a file with the following steps:
1- rsync ftp.cn.debian.org::debian/dists/wheezy/main/binary-amd64/
2018 Mar 20
2
Very slow to start sync with millions of directories and files
On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 5:49 PM Kevin Korb <kmk at sanitarium.net> wrote:
> Nothing there should be preventing incremental indexing. That means it
> should start copying as soon as it finds a file that needs to be copied.
>
Doesn't it tries to create all (empty) directories first?
> On 03/20/2018 02:33 PM, Bráulio Bhavamitra wrote:
> >
> >
> > Em seg, 19
2016 Jun 02
2
rsync keeps writing files over
OK. Thanks. Where can I find information regarding how to interpret
—itemize-changes?
The timestamps aren’t changing, so the target must not be storing them,
which I have no idea why. The directory I’m writing to is 777.
What is the flag to tell rsync to ignore the timestamps?
Thanks,
Blake
On 6/2/16, 6:18 PM, "rsync on behalf of Kevin Korb"
<rsync-bounces at lists.samba.org on
2018 Mar 20
2
Very slow to start sync with millions of directories and files
Em seg, 19 de mar de 2018 11:34, Kevin Korb via rsync <rsync at lists.samba.org>
escreveu:
> The performance of rsync with a huge number of files is greatly
> determined by every option you are using. So, what is your whole
> command line?
>
rsync -avP /data-old/ /data
>
> On 03/19/2018 09:05 AM, Bráulio Bhavamitra via rsync wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> >
2017 Apr 07
3
modification times questions
Thank you!
I run --times when I use rsync (I actually use the -a flag) but the times do not transfer over and if I run rsync dryrun with -i I can see that it wants to transfer the files because of times. When I run rsync a second time with your suggestion the times do transfer over. I don't know why...
B
________________________________________
From: rsync [rsync-bounces at lists.samba.org]
2016 Jun 02
2
rsync keeps writing files over
Thanks Kevin! I¹m unclear how to read the ‹itemize-changes output. Can you
provide some insight?
This is a local transfer from an external drive to an internal drive all
attached to one computer.
rsync -aPh --itemize-changes -n
/Volumes/shuttle_05/2012_79_1_14_1__1199_Workprint /Volumes/3TB_LTO/LT003A/
sending incremental file list
>f..t.......
2018 Dec 31
2
--partial does not "unhide" the files
Kevin Korb via rsync <rsync at lists.samba.org> (So 30 Dez 2018 23:56:44 CET):
> I think --partial might be a red herring here. It only applies to what
> happens when rsync is aborted in the middle of a file. What happens
> without -P?
Same happens w/o --partial. I append 2 logs:
- a from localhost to remote server, exposing the missing "rename"
- b from localhost to
2017 Apr 07
3
modification times questions
How do I transfer just the modification times with rsync? I now the file content is the same but the modification times are different. Is there a way to do this? Every way that I have tried causes the whole file to transfer as well.
Thanks
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
2016 Jun 02
9
rsync keeps writing files over
Cool Thanks!
Specifically, the timestamps on both <src> and <dest> match for "ls -l"
but do not match for "ls -lu" or "ls -lc”
The storage is just an regular HDD in a mac pro tower. I can’t imagine why
it wouldn’t handle timestamps. Also of note - this problem doesn’t exist
for every file, just the vast majority. So, that just makes it more
confusing.
Yes,
2014 Dec 03
4
encrypted rsyncd - why was it never implemented?
rsync in daemon mode is very powerful, yet it comes with one big
disadvantage: data is sent in plain.
The workarounds are not really satisfying:
- use VPN - one needs to set up an extra service, not always possible
- use stunnel - as above
- use SSH - is not as powerful as in daemon mode (i.e. read only access,
chroot, easy way of adding/modifying users and modules etc.)
Why was encrypted
2016 Dec 17
2
script showing extended stats ( deleted/added ...)
is there a script which analyses rsync output with --itemize-changes ?
i.e. i would like to have extended information on number of deleted files, created directories, changed files....
i know rsync 3.1.x is better with this, but it`s still not in centos 5/6/7 and i don`t want to update tons of systems to get extended statistics, so i wonder if anbody did an analyze script to get that information