similar to: What's the substitution of 'samba-tool domain provision' in v4.17.5

> samba-tool domain: no such subcommand: provision Are you sure there's no typo or hidden character? provision command is still there in 4.18.2 :) # samba-tool domain provision ERROR: No domain set! -- Lorenzo Milesi - lorenzo.milesi at yetopen.com CTO @ YetOpen Srl Corso Martiri della Liberazione 114 - 23900 Lecco - ITALY - | 4801 Glenwood Avenue - Suite 200 - Raleigh, NC 27612 - USA

On 06/06/2023 10:39, Lorenzo Milesi via samba wrote: >> Yes you can use the Ubuntu 22.04 packages if you really must, but this >> will only get you Samba 4.15.3 >> On the other hand, Using Samba from backports on Debian bullseye will >> get you 4.17.8 and is, in my opinion, easier to use. > > Both for Debian and Ubuntu it's better to use Michael repos, to get

> Yes you can use the Ubuntu 22.04 packages if you really must, but this > will only get you Samba 4.15.3 > On the other hand, Using Samba from backports on Debian bullseye will > get you 4.17.8 and is, in my opinion, easier to use. Both for Debian and Ubuntu it's better to use Michael repos, to get consistent minor release updates: http://www.corpit.ru/mjt/packages/samba/README

On 06/06/2023 10:14, luckydog xf wrote: > Makes sense. > Can I use Ubuntu 22.04 as an alternative to Debian ?? Does Ubuntu have a > DEB package in the official repository? > It's pretty bothersome if I build packages from source codes on Ubuntu, > because?they're so many packages and dependencies that need to be resolved. > Yes you can use the Ubuntu 22.04 packages if

On 06/06/2023 10:51, Lorenzo Milesi via samba wrote: > >> As I understand it, you only need Michael's repo for Ubuntu, The Debian >> backport repo gets updated with the same Samba packages as his repo (or >> is it the other way around ?). He is the Debian Samba maintainer. > > With the repos you can select several minor versions (from 4.16 to .18), while backports

I know about this param, I configured it and log.smbd, log.nmbd and others are rotated, log.samba is not. ----- Original Message ----- > From: "samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> > To: "Lorenzo Milesi" <maxxer at yetopen.it>, "samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> > Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2020 7:29:04 PM > Subject: Re: [Samba] log.samba

Latest Samba4 upgrade (4.3.11+dfsg-0ubuntu0.16.04.26) broke external LDAP auth probably with the following error: LDAP request size (81) exceeds (0) samba-tool outputs the following when ran: Unknown parameter encountered: "ldap max anonymous request size" Ignoring unknown parameter "ldap max anonymous request size" Unknown parameter encountered: "ldap max authenticated

On 07/02/2023 18:35, Lorenzo Milesi via samba wrote: > > >> A little more context, manual replication unfortunately doesn't help: > > Last (sorry for the spam, I'm starting to forget things): > > # dig _ldap._tcp.pdc._msdcs.wdc.domain.it srv > > ;; ANSWER SECTION: > _ldap._tcp.pdc._msdcs.wdc.domain.it. 900 IN SRV 0 100 389 dc1.wdc.domain.it. > >

> The latest Samba version is 4.10.6 and there have been numerous updates > since 4.3.11, but you shouldn't be having the problem you have, so lets > start be you posting your smb.conf Thank you very much. Here it is: [global] server services = s3fs, rpc, nbt, wrepl, ldap, cldap, kdc, drepl, winbindd, ntp_signd, kcc, dnsupdate realm = domain.lan ldap server require strong auth =

Can you try this and adjust the path's in it. #/etc/logrotate.d/samba /var/log/samba/log.smbd { weekly missingok rotate 7 postrotate [ ! -x /usr/bin/smbcontrol ] || [ ! -f /run/samba/smbd.pid ] || /usr/bin/smbcontrol smbd reload-config endscript compress delaycompress notifempty } /var/log/samba/log.nmbd {

> Not sure, but that is the way it looks, just a thought, are you using > sssd ? no, not even installed > Just like a normal share, '[homes]' is a special share that doesn't use > 'path. There used to be something on the wiki about using '[home]' on a > DC, I didn't know it had gone until you mentioned it ;-) So if I use [home] it would be a normal

08.03.2023 20:09, Fabrizio Rompani via samba ?????: ... > root at landc:~# samba-tool drs showrepl --summary > There are failing connections > Failing outbound connections: > CN=Configuration,DC=domain,DC=lan > Default-First-Site-Name\NEXTCLOUD via RPC > DSA object GUID: 3fa4ff9a-7fdc-4912-ad73-08b98f6bf347 > Last attempt @ Wed Mar 8

Hi. We migrated a S4 workgroup to S4 AD DC, I'm trying to allow users to access the new \\fileserver with the old host name \\server. I added a CNAME record to the AD DNS zone, created alias for fileserver with samba-tool spn add ldap/SERVER fileserver$ samba-tool spn add HOST/SERVER fileserver$ I also added netbios aliases = server to smb.conf but this should be useless, as

Samba 4.12.1 installed from source following the wiki. I noticed /usr/local/samba/var/log.samba is not being rotated at all, it starts since the day I installed and it's still growing (500M so far). Is this something which must be handled manually with a logrotate entry? What signalling does samba require after the file has been rotated? I didn't find anything on the wiki, is it worth

> As I understand it, you only need Michael's repo for Ubuntu, The Debian > backport repo gets updated with the same Samba packages as his repo (or > is it the other way around ?). He is the Debian Samba maintainer. With the repos you can select several minor versions (from 4.16 to .18), while backports only contains the latest (currently 4.18) IIRC. -- Lorenzo Milesi -

> which share isn't working ? > is it 'CONDIVISIONE' ? What is really weird is: Computer01, Win10, user1 logged in as local (not using domain user), share mapped with domain user. In the path I've posted in the first message the user can access BUT cannot write. Computer01, Win10, user1 logged in as domain user: same as above, user can access the folder but cannot write.

> I would expect to only see that on a machine with the MIT kdc installed, > try this > > apt-get -s remove krb5-kdc > > This will prove one way or other if it is installed and what it wants to > remove along with it, it will not remove anything. Apparently nothing requires it: The following packages were automatically installed and are no longer required:

> trying again. here's the output. thanks! Config collected --- 2020-05-18-23:08 ----------- Hostname: fileserver DNS Domain: wdc.mydomain.it Realm: WDC.MYDOMAIN.IT FQDN: fileserver.wdc.mydomain.it ipaddress: 10.0.0.3 ----------- This computer is running Ubuntu 18.04.4 LTS x86_64 ----------- running command : ip a 1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc

On 01/07/2020 20:16, Lorenzo Milesi via samba wrote: > For the record, with the support of TranquilIT we added a new server for DC an "demoted" this one to fileserver only and it's working like a charm. > > So I suppose the "single server" solution is not viable anyomre, or at least it doesn't seem so. > We have never recommended using a DC as a fileserver,

I am quite confident about the command I was typing. :) And I copied from yours and tried it again. == [root at dc ~]# samba-tool domain provision samba-tool domain: no such subcommand: provision Usage: samba-tool domain <subcommand> Domain management. Options: -h, --help show this help message and exit Available subcommands: info - Print basic info about a domain and the DC