similar to: Moving default snapshot location

All, I assume this issue is pretty old given the time ZFS has been around. I have tried searching the list but could not get understand the structure of how ZFS actually takes snapshot space into account. I have a user walter on whom I try to do the following ZFS operations bash-3.00# zfs get quota store/catB/home/walter NAME PROPERTY VALUE SOURCE

ZFS Fans, Here''s a list of features that we are proposing for Solaris 10u5. Keep in mind that this is subject to change. Features: PSARC 2007/142 zfs rename -r PSARC 2007/171 ZFS Separate Intent Log PSARC 2007/197 ZFS hotplug PSARC 2007/199 zfs {create,clone,rename} -p PSARC 2007/283 FMA for ZFS Phase 2 PSARC/2006/465 ZFS Delegated Administration PSARC/2006/577 zpool property to

In another thread recursive snapshot creation was found atomic so that it is done quickly, and more important, all at once or nothing at all. Do you know if recursive destroying and renaming of snapshots are atomic too? Regards Henrik Heino

Thank you for reading this, sorry to waste bandwidth otherwise. I am part of a US company looking for someone to setup a demo IVR system for us. I seem unable with my current knowledge to pull this off myself. The demo is the regular enter your id and validate/repeat/continue methodoligy you put up with in everyday life. I would like to have the validation and other parts done via database

I need a good server vendor(not dell) that i can get a server from that is 1u rack mountable(2u max) with a decent turnaround(i am hoping if i order tomorrow i can get it within two weeks. who would you recommend? -- My "Foundation" verse: Isa 54:17 No weapon that is formed against thee shall prosper; and every tongue that shall rise against thee in judgment thou shalt condemn.

Hello. I want to know what is the unit of compression in ZFS. Is it 4 KB or larger? Is it tunnable? Thanks. Thanos -- This message posted from opensolaris.org

Hi all, As per the instructions here <http://llvm.org/docs/DeveloperPolicy.html#obtaining-commit-access>, I contacted Chris Lattner to obtain commit access but haven't received a response (either positive or negative). What's the expected turnaround time for this (I contacted him five days ago)? In case he's currently unavailable, is there someone else I could contact? Thanks,

On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Krzysztof Parzyszek < kparzysz at codeaurora.org> wrote: > On 4/17/2013 12:15 PM, Eric Christopher wrote: > >> >> Give a compelling argument and I might :) >> > > The cost is the extra time spent verifying that the binaries are fresh. > In my experience it has never happened that I ran "make check" on a wrong >

On Apr 17, 2013, at 10:43 AM, Eli Bendersky <eliben at google.com> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Krzysztof Parzyszek <kparzysz at codeaurora.org> wrote: > On 4/17/2013 12:15 PM, Eric Christopher wrote: > > Give a compelling argument and I might :) > > The cost is the extra time spent verifying that the binaries are fresh. In my

Apologies if this has been addressed, but looking at some of the sun blogs and google searches I have not been able to find an answer. Does ZFS support on write automatic snapshots? For example, according to defined policy, every time a file is written a snapshot is created with the diff stored. I can see this being useful in high security environments and companies that have extreme regulatory

Deduplication was committed last night by Mr. Bonwick: > Log message: > PSARC 2009/571 ZFS Deduplication Properties > 6677093 zfs should have dedup capability http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/onnv-notify/2009-November/010683.html Via c0t0d0s0.org.

The bot hiccupped earlier but looks stable now. The average turnaround seems to be 3.5 hours. clang: http://lab.llvm.org:8080/coverage/coverage-reports/clang/index.html lld: http://lab.llvm.org:8080/coverage/coverage-reports/lld/index.html polly: http://lab.llvm.org:8080/coverage/coverage-reports/polly/index.html > On Sep 23, 2016, at 11:58 PM, Tobias Grosser via llvm-dev

http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=2247 Summary: tests/functional/cli_root/zpool_upgrade/zpool_upgrade_00 7_pos panics - zfs snapshot Classification: Development Product: zfs-crypto Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: Solaris Status: NEW Severity: major Priority:

I have three zpools on a server and want to add a mirrored pair of ssd''s for the ZIL. Can the same pair of SSDs be used for the ZIL of all three zpools or is it one ZIL SLOG device per zpool? -- This message posted from opensolaris.org

On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 10:50 AM Robinson, Paul <paul.robinson at sony.com> wrote: > SCE tuning does turn on the .debug_aranges section. Our debugger team > really cares about startup cost. Turnaround time in general is huge for our > licensees, to the point where we support edit-and-continue (minimal > rebuild, live-patch the running process). > Ah, good to know! I'd

Hey Timo, Thanks for the quick turnaround, once we have the test results I'll contact you again. Should I also include instructions on how to run the a self contained server with a dummy backend so you can independently verify our results? Leander Beernaert Proton AG ------- Original Message ------- On Thursday, February 23rd, 2023 at 8:59 PM, Timo Sirainen <timo at sirainen.com>

Hi, wasn't the change of the mailing list software some time ago expected to fix the long delays on the Asterisk lists? I still see turnaround times of half an hour, or so. Can others confirm this? Does anybody have an idea about the reason? cu Reinhard

Hey folks, I have no knowledge at all about how streams work in Solaris, so this might have a simple answer, or be completely impossible. Unfortunately I''m a windows admin so haven''t a clue which :) We''re looking at rolling out a couple of ZFS servers on our network, and instead of tapes we''re considering using off-site NAS boxes for backups. We think

Hello, I want to setup an opensolaris for centralized storage server, using ZFS as the underlying FS, on a RAID 10 SATA disks. I will export the storage blocks using ISCSI to RHEL 5 (less than 10 clients, and I will format the partition as EXT3) I want to ask... 1. Is this setup suitable for mission critical use now? 2. Can I use LVM with this setup? Currently we are using NFS as the

On Fri, Jan 19, 2018, at 05:47, Chris Lattner via llvm-dev wrote: > > > > On Jan 18, 2018, at 6:02 AM, Michael Kruse <llvmdev at meinersbur.de> wrote: > > > > 2018-01-18 6:40 GMT+01:00 Chris Lattner <clattner at nondot.org>: > >> Great, I think that that would be a fine approach: you can have the cmake logic detect which version of isl is installed