similar to: space_map.c ''ss == NULL'' panic strikes back.

I have a 100gb SAN lun in a pool, been running ok for about 6 months. panicked the system this morning. system was running S10U2. In the course of troubleshooting I''ve installed the latest recommended bundle including kjp 118833-36 and zfs patch 124204-03 created as: zpool create zfspool01 /dev/dsk/emcpower0c zfs create zfspool01/nb60openv zfs set mountpoint=legacy zfspool01/nb60openv

One of our Solaris 10 update 3 servers paniced today with the following error: Sep 18 00:34:53 m2000ef savecore: [ID 570001 auth.error] reboot after panic: assertion failed: ss != NULL, file: ../../common/fs/zfs/space_map.c, line: 125 The server saved a core file, and the resulting backtrace is listed below: $ mdb unix.0 vmcore.0 > $c vpanic() 0xfffffffffb9b49f3() space_map_remove+0x239()

Hi all. One of our server had a panic and now can''t mount the zpool anymore! Here is what I get at boot: Mar 21 11:09:17 SERVER142 ^Mpanic[cpu1]/thread=ffffffff90878200: Mar 21 11:09:17 SERVER142 genunix: [ID 603766 kern.notice] assertion failed: ss->ss_start <= start (0x670000b800 <= 0x67 00009000), file: ../../common/fs/zfs/space_map.c, line: 126 Mar 21 11:09:17 SERVER142

Hello all, I am trying to understand how the allocation of space_map happens. What I am trying to figure out is how the recursive part is handled. From what I understand a new allocation (say appending to a file) will cause the space map to change by appending more allocs that will require extra space on disk and as such will change the space map again. I understand that the space map is treated

I''m really angry against ZFS: My server no more reboots because the ZFS spacemap is again corrupt. I just replaced the whole spacemap by recreating a new zpool from scratch and copying back the data with "zfs send & zfs receive". Did it copied corrupt spacemap?! For me its now terminated. I loss to much time and money with this experimental filesystem. My version is Zpool

I have a ZFS pool that has been corrupted. The pool contains a single device which was actually a file on UFS. The machine was accidentally halted and now the pool is corrupt. There are (of course) no backups and I''ve been asked to recover the pool. The system panics when trying to do anything with the pool. root@:/$ zpool status panic[cpu1]/thread=fffffe8000758c80: assertion failed:

Hello ZFS, System was rebooted and after reboot server again System is snv_39, SPARC, T2000 bash-3.00# ptree 7 /lib/svc/bin/svc.startd -s 163 /sbin/sh /lib/svc/method/fs-local 254 /usr/sbin/zfs mount -a [...] bash-3.00# zfs list|wc -l 46 Using df I can see most file systems are already mounted. > ::ps!grep zfs R 254 163 7 7 0 0x4a004000

how does one free segment(offset=77984887808 size=66560) on a pool that won''t import? looks like I found http://bugs.opensolaris.org/view_bug.do?bug_id=6580715 http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/zfs-discuss/2007-September/042541.html when I luupgrade a ufs partition with a dvd-b62 that was bfu to b68 with a dvd of b74 it booted fine and I was doing the same thing that I had done on

hello all, i have indiana freshly installed on a sun ultra 20 machine. It only does nfs server. During one night, the kernel had crashed, and i got this messages: " May 22 02:18:57 ultra20 unix: [ID 836849 kern.notice] May 22 02:18:57 ultra20 ^Mpanic[cpu0]/thread=ffffff0003d06c80: May 22 02:18:57 ultra20 genunix: [ID 603766 kern.notice] assertion failed: sm->sm_space == 0 (0x40000000 ==

Hello all, I have an oi_148a PC with a single root disk, and since recently it fails to boot - hangs after the copyright message whenever I use any of my GRUB menu options. Booting with an oi_148a LiveUSB I had around since installation, I ran some zdb traversals over the rpool and zpool import attempts. The imports fail by running the kernel out of RAM (as recently discussed in the list with

Howdy, We are using ZFS on one of our Solaris 10 servers, and the box paniced this evening with the following stack trace: Nov 24 04:03:35 foo unix: [ID 100000 kern.notice] Nov 24 04:03:35 foo genunix: [ID 802836 kern.notice] fffffe80004a14d0 fffffffffb9b49f3 () Nov 24 04:03:35 foo genunix: [ID 655072 kern.notice] fffffe80004a1550 zfs:space_map_remove+239 () Nov 24 04:03:35 foo genunix: [ID

I''m running FreeBSD 8.1 with ZFS v15. Recently some time after moving my mirrored pool from one device to another system crashes. From that time on zpool cannot be used/imported - any attempt fails with: solaris assert: sm->space + size &lt;= sm->size, file: /usr/src/sys/moules/zfs/../../cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs/space_map.c, line: 93 Debugging reveals that:

http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=2334 Summary: zpool destroy panics after zfs_force_umount_stress Classification: Development Product: zfs-crypto Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: Solaris Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P2 Component: other AssignedTo:

I have a raid-z zfs filesystem with 3 disks. The disk was starting have read and write errors. The disks was so bad that I started to have trans_err. The server lock up and the server was reset. Then now when trying to import the pool the system panic. I installed the last Recommend on my Solaris U3 and also install the last Kernel patch (120011-14). But still when trying to do zpool import

Hello all, I found this dialog on the zfs-devel at zfsonlinux.org list, and I''d like someone to confirm-or-reject the discussed statement. Paraphrasing in my words and understanding: "Labels, including Uberblock rings, are fixed 256KB in size each, of which 128KB is the UB ring. Normally there is 1KB of data in one UB, which gives 128 TXGs to rollback to. When ashift=12 is

Hi. I was looking for help on how to use Tukey multiple comparison on Type III SS because I read on Quick R that it is using Type I SS by default. I am wondering if the use of glht helps. Thanks for help. Vera

Unbelievable! These guys get more and more disgusting each day. But now I have a proof that Linux and all its free software community (samba included) are indeed growing and are indeed consideder a threat by M$. Expect more and dirtier moves. Can you guys point me to more material on the subject? []'s, Juan > From: "Le Quellec, Francis" <FLeQuell@Teknor.com> > >

Ironically, just as we have a big thread on cross compatabilty somehow the configure for vorbis on BeOS stops with the message i586-pc-beos is not currently supported by libao configure: error: ./configure failed for vorbis-tools/libao it just needs the 'exit 1' taking out of the libao configure script on line 1313 or a proper fix from the main configure script; Dave --- >8 ----

Dear all: I m a newer on R.? I have some problem when I use?anova function.? I use anova function to get Type I SS results, but I also need to get Type III SS results.? However, in my code, there is some different between the result of Type I SS and Type III SS.? I don?t know why the ?seqe? factor disappeared in the result of Type III SS.? How can I do?? Here is my example and result.

We are using MySQL, and love the idea of using zfs for this. We are used to using Direct I/O to bypass file system caching (let the DB do this). Does this exist for zfs? This message posted from opensolaris.org