similar to: Degraded zpool won''t online disk device, instead resilvers spare

Running a zpool scrub on our production pool is showing a scrub rate of about 400K/s. (When this pool was first set up we saw rates in the MB/s range during a scrub). Both zpool iostat and an iostat -Xn show lots of idle disk times, no above average service times, no abnormally high busy percentages. Load on the box is .59. 8 x 3GHz, 32GB ram, 96 spindles arranged into raidz zdevs on OI 147.

Estimada comunidad tengo un problema del que no encuentro datos que me ayuden mucho en la web. Estoy haciendo calculos por grupos con data,table. Tengo un archivo (zp.res) con tres columnas que clasifican los datos (sol, con, dia) y una columna de datos numericos (media), de la siguiente forma: sol con dia media 1: con 0 1 -22.6 2: con 0 1 -36.6 3: con 0 1 -35.6 y

Hi, I have a problem using the function 'reshape' for the following dataset: input: X Y Z T.U.1 T.U.2 T.V.1 T.V.2 1.00 1.00 A 24.94 24.74 34.65 35.33 1.00 3.00 A 26.03 25.87 25.76 26.12 1.00 1.00 B 24.76 24.63 34.34 34.48 1.00 3.00 B 26.15 25.98 25.96 25.66 2.00 1.00 A 24.40 24.26 34.55

Anna Crepes: Traubenzucker + Feldsalat spezielles Dressing (bringt selbst mit?) -------- Weitergeleitete Nachricht -------- Betreff: Fwd: Fwd: Fwd: Fwd: Fwd: Fwd: Fwd: 26. Datum: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 15:34:39 +0100 Von: Markus <universe at truemetal.org> An: universe at truemetal.org Geschenke Moritz: dunkle Schokolade. Geschenke Anna: normale Schokolade. -------- Weitergeleitete

Hi, I have several xts objects that are historical quotes downloaded as such: library(quantmod) > getSymbols("AA") > head(AA) AA.Open AA.High AA.Low AA.Close AA.Volume AA.Adjusted 2007-01-03 30.05 30.06 29.17 29.33 8176300 26.89 2007-01-04 29.33 29.40 28.81 29.11 5655800 26.69 2007-01-05 29.11 29.24 28.49 28.76 7453100

OMG.. how embarassing.. that was my personal reminder E-Mail for x-mas dinner. Not meant for this list. Please ignore. Shame on me.. *blushing* LOL. Am 12.12.2014 um 21:19 schrieb Markus: > Anna Crepes: Traubenzucker > + Feldsalat spezielles Dressing (bringt selbst mit?) > > > > -------- Weitergeleitete Nachricht -------- > Betreff: Fwd: Fwd: Fwd: Fwd: Fwd: Fwd: Fwd: 26.

R Help - I'm trying to run a correlation matrix with a covariate of "age" and will at some point will also want to covary other variables concurrently. I'm using the "psych" package and have tried other methods such as writing a loop to extract semi-partial correlations, but it does not seem to be working. How can I accomplish this? library(psych) > set.cor(y =

On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 03:25:30PM +0200, Duncan Sands wrote: > Hi Jack, I pulled the loop vectorizer and fast math changes into the 3.3 branch, > so hopefully they will be part of 3.3 rc3 (and 3.3 final!). It would be great > if you could redo the benchmarks rc3. > Duncan, As requested, appended are the updated Polyhedron 2005 benchmark results with both RC1 and RC3 llvm 3.3

Dear List, i am trying to produce a 3d plot using wireframe using the code: wireframe(Residuals_FD ~ Elevation * Temperature, data = data2, scales = list(arrows = FALSE), drape = TRUE, colorkey = TRUE) As you can see when the code (using the data below) is run the plot area is set-up correctly but the actual surface is missing? Any help would be greatly appreciated. Chris #data Elevation

Hi, I am trying to construct a logistic regression model from my data (104 patients and 25 events). I build a full model consisting of five predictors with the use of penalization by rms package (lrm, pentrace etc) because of events per variable issue. Then, I tried to approximate the full model by step-down technique predicting L from all of the componet variables using ordinary least squares

Hi Jack, On 29/05/13 22:04, Jack Howarth wrote: > On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 03:25:30PM +0200, Duncan Sands wrote: >> Hi Jack, I pulled the loop vectorizer and fast math changes into the 3.3 branch, >> so hopefully they will be part of 3.3 rc3 (and 3.3 final!). It would be great >> if you could redo the benchmarks rc3. >> > > Duncan, > As requested, appended

Hi all, I recently performed a series of compiler performance tests on FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT, particularly comparing gcc 4.2.1 and gcc 4.7.1 against clang 3.1 and clang 3.2. The attached text file[1] contains more information about the tests, some semi-cooked performance data, and my conclusions. Any errors and omissions are also my fault, so if you notice them, please let me know. The

Below are the results for the Polyhedron 2005 benchmarks compiled with llvm/compiler-rt/dragonegg 3.3svn at r182439 against current FSF gcc 4.7.3svn and 4.8.1svn. The only major bug remaining in the dragonegg 3.3svn support for gcc 4.8.x is http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=15980 which results in unresolved symbols for _iround and _iroundf in the aermod and rnflow testcases. Note that this

On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 04:16:29PM -0800, Michael Dalton wrote: > Commit 2613af0ed18a ("virtio_net: migrate mergeable rx buffers to page frag > allocators") changed the mergeable receive buffer size from PAGE_SIZE to > MTU-size, introducing a single-stream regression for benchmarks with large > average packet size. There is no single optimal buffer size for all >

On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 04:16:29PM -0800, Michael Dalton wrote: > Commit 2613af0ed18a ("virtio_net: migrate mergeable rx buffers to page frag > allocators") changed the mergeable receive buffer size from PAGE_SIZE to > MTU-size, introducing a single-stream regression for benchmarks with large > average packet size. There is no single optimal buffer size for all >