Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "Moving zfs to an iscsci equallogic LUN"
2009 Mar 13
2
Help setting up multipathing on CentOS 4.7 to an Equallogic iSCSI target
I'm trying to test out an Equallogic PS5500 with a server running CentOS 4.7
I can create a volume and mount it fine using the standard
iscsi-initiator-utils tools.
The Equallogic box has 3 Gigabit interfaces and I would like to try to
set up things so I can read/write from/to the volume using multiple NICs
on the server i.e. get 200+ Mbyte/s access to the volume - I've had some
2009 Oct 13
3
Dell Equallogic
Hi List,
Does anyone here use Dell Equallogic IP SAN? If so, do you have any
immediate high points / low points you wouldn't mind discussing on- or
off-list ?
Thanks.
2010 Aug 21
8
ZFS with Equallogic storage
I''m planning on setting up an NFS server for our ESXi hosts and plan on using a virtualized Solaris or Nexenta host to serve ZFS over NFS.
The storage I have available is provided by Equallogic boxes over 10Gbe iSCSI.
I am trying to figure out the best way to provide both performance and resiliency given the Equallogic provides the redundancy.
Since I am hoping to provide a 2TB
2011 Mar 14
1
Support XCP 1.0 for adapter Dell EqualLogic PS Series SAN arrays on Xencenter
Anyone here using the XCP 1.0 Storage EqualLogic has the dell? In
Citrix XenServer Xencerter appears to integration, but in XenCenter
not with XCP. I read that the drivers were removed. No way around
installing the drivers again?
Cordialmente,
Lorscheider Santiago
+55 85 81559040
Msn: lorscheider_santiago@hotmail.com
Visite meu blog: http://lsantiago.spaces.live.com
Twitter:
2008 Feb 08
4
Subsetting a data.frame degenerates at one column?
Greetings.
At the moment, I'm applying R to some AIX 'nmon' output, trying to get
a handle on some disk performance metrics. In case anyone's
interested:
http://docs.osg.ufl.edu/tsm/pdf/
some of them are more edifying than others. (ahem)
I'm trying to develop a somewhat general framework for plotting these
measures, in the hopes that it's of some use to people other
2018 Jan 09
2
Bricks to sub-volume mapping
Hi Team,
Please let me know how I can know which bricks are part of which sub-volumes in case of disperse volume, for example in below volume has two sub-volumes :
Type: Distributed-Disperse
Volume ID: 6dc8ced8-27aa-4481-bfe8-057133c31d0b
Status: Started
Snapshot Count: 0
Number of Bricks: 2 x (4 + 2) = 12
Transport-type: tcp
Bricks:
Brick1: pdchyperscale1sds:/ws/disk1/ws_brick
Brick2:
2017 Jul 07
3
[Gluster-devel] gfid and volume-id extended attributes lost
On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 9:25 PM, Ankireddypalle Reddy <areddy at commvault.com>
wrote:
> 3.7.19
>
These are the only callers for removexattr and only _posix_remove_xattr has
the potential to do removexattr as posix_removexattr already makes sure
that it is not gfid/volume-id. And surprise surprise _posix_remove_xattr
happens only from healing code of afr/ec. And this can only happen
2018 Jan 09
2
Bricks to sub-volume mapping
But do we store this information somewhere as part of gluster metadata or something...
Thanks and Regards,
--Anand
Extn : 6974
Mobile : 91 9552527199, 91 9850160173
From: Aravinda [mailto:avishwan at redhat.com]
Sent: 09 January 2018 12:31
To: Anand Malagi <amalagi at commvault.com>; gluster-users at gluster.org
Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Bricks to sub-volume mapping
First 6 bricks
2017 Jul 07
0
[Gluster-devel] gfid and volume-id extended attributes lost
We lost the attributes on all the bricks on servers glusterfs2 and glusterfs3 again.
[root at glusterfs2 Log_Files]# gluster volume info
Volume Name: StoragePool
Type: Distributed-Disperse
Volume ID: 149e976f-4e21-451c-bf0f-f5691208531f
Status: Started
Number of Bricks: 20 x (2 + 1) = 60
Transport-type: tcp
Bricks:
Brick1: glusterfs1sds:/ws/disk1/ws_brick
Brick2: glusterfs2sds:/ws/disk1/ws_brick
2009 Apr 21
4
Windows DomU on NAS
Hello,
I''d like to be able to create a windows DomU which is to be stored on
a NAS (Equallogic) device. I was wondering if anyone has any best
practices on how to do this? Is there a way to extend the DomU C drive
once you create the initial device, etc? Any suggestions would be great.
I have already tried this by just using a phy:/dev/path-to-iscsi-mount-
point and it appears to
2017 Jul 08
2
[Gluster-devel] gfid and volume-id extended attributes lost
Ram,
As per the code, self-heal was the only candidate which *can* do it.
Could you check logs of self-heal daemon and the mount to check if there
are any metadata heals on root?
+Sanoj
Sanoj,
Is there any systemtap script we can use to detect which process is
removing these xattrs?
On Sat, Jul 8, 2017 at 2:58 AM, Ankireddypalle Reddy <areddy at commvault.com>
wrote:
>
2018 Jan 09
0
Bricks to sub-volume mapping
First 6 bricks belong to First sub volume and next 6 bricks belong to
second.
On Tuesday 09 January 2018 12:11 PM, Anand Malagi wrote:
>
> Hi Team,
>
> Please let me know how I can know which bricks are part of which
> sub-volumes in case of disperse volume, for example in below volume
> has two sub-volumes :
>
> Type: Distributed-Disperse
>
> Volume ID:
2007 Aug 07
5
Extending RAIDZ.
Yeah:)
I''d like to work on this. Here are my first observations:
- We need to call vdev_op_asize method with additonal ''offset'' argument,
- We need to move data to new disk starting from the very begining, so
we can''t reuse scrub/resilver code which does tree-walk through the
data.
Below you can see how I imagine to extend RAIDZ. Here is the legend:
2017 Jul 10
2
[Gluster-devel] gfid and volume-id extended attributes lost
Please use the systemtap script(
https://paste.fedoraproject.org/paste/EGDa0ErwX0LV3y-gBYpfNA) to check
which process is invoking remove xattr calls.
It prints the pid, tid and arguments of all removexattr calls.
I have checked for these fops at the protocol/client and posix translators.
To run the script ..
1) install systemtap and dependencies.
2) install glusterfs-debuginfo
3) change the path
2017 Jul 10
2
[Gluster-devel] gfid and volume-id extended attributes lost
Thanks for the swift turn around. Will try this out and let you know.
Thanks and Regards,
Ram
From: Pranith Kumar Karampuri [mailto:pkarampu at redhat.com]
Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 8:31 AM
To: Sanoj Unnikrishnan
Cc: Ankireddypalle Reddy; Gluster Devel (gluster-devel at gluster.org); gluster-users at gluster.org
Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] gfid and volume-id extended attributes lost
Ram,
2018 Jan 09
0
Bricks to sub-volume mapping
No, we don't store the information separately. But it can be easily
predictable from the Volume Info.
For example, in the below Volume info, it shows "Number of Bricks" in
the following format,
??? Number of Subvols x (Number of Data bricks + Number of Redundancy
bricks) = Total Bricks
Note: Sub volumes are predictable without storing it as separate info
since we do not have
2013 Apr 29
2
Samba 3 dynamically enable or disable share
Hello,
? ?I wonder if it is possible to dynamically enable/disable samba 3 shares.?
Here is my problem.?
On a remote server I have 4 removable hard drives, large capacity. I am not using any RAID/JBOD, so each drive is mounted individually (like /mnt/DISK1, /mnt/DISK2 etc) and each drive is individually shared, something like:
[STORAGE01]
path = /mnt/DISK1
Guest OK = false
...
[STORAGE02]
2017 Jul 10
0
[Gluster-devel] gfid and volume-id extended attributes lost
@ pranith , yes . we can get the pid on all removexattr call and also print
the backtrace of the glusterfsd process when trigerring removing xattr.
I will write the script and reply back.
On Sat, Jul 8, 2017 at 7:06 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri <pkarampu at redhat.com
> wrote:
> Ram,
> As per the code, self-heal was the only candidate which *can* do
> it. Could you check
2010 Sep 29
10
Resliver making the system unresponsive
This must be resliver day :)
I just had a drive failure. The hot spare kicked in, and access to the pool over NFS was effectively zero for about 45 minutes. Currently the pool is still reslivering, but for some reason I can access the file system now.
Resliver speed has been beaten to death I know, but is there a way to avoid this? For example, is more enterprisy hardware less susceptible to
2017 Jul 10
0
[Gluster-devel] gfid and volume-id extended attributes lost
Ram,
If you see it again, you can use this. I am going to send out a patch
for the code path which can lead to removal of gfid/volume-id tomorrow.
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 5:19 PM, Sanoj Unnikrishnan <sunnikri at redhat.com>
wrote:
> Please use the systemtap script(https://paste.fedoraproject.org/paste/
> EGDa0ErwX0LV3y-gBYpfNA) to check which process is invoking remove xattr