Displaying 20 results from an estimated 600 matches similar to: "vfs_shadow_copy2 cannot read/find snapshots"
2023 May 22
1
vfs_shadow_copy2 cannot read/find snapshots
Hi Sebastian,
why are you using shadow:snapprefix if this is just ?snap??
Does it work using ONLY shadow:format = snap_GMT-%Y.%m.%d-%H.%M.%S ?
If you use snapprefix you also need to use shadow:delimiter (in your case this would be ?_?). However, I never managed to get it working with snapprefix on my machines.
Alexander
> On Monday, May 22, 2023 at 2:52 PM, Sebastian Neustein via samba
2023 May 22
2
vfs_shadow_copy2 cannot read/find snapshots
Hi Alexander
# net conf delparm projects shadow:snapprefix
does not change a thing. The error persists. (I killed my smb session
before trying again).
log still says:
[2023/05/22 15:23:23.324179,? 1]
../../source3/modules/vfs_shadow_copy2.c:2222(shadow_copy2_get_shadow_copy_data)
? shadow_copy2_get_shadow_copy_data: SMB_VFS_NEXT_OPEN failed for
2023 May 22
1
vfs_shadow_copy2 cannot read/find snapshots
The gluster side looks like this:
root at B741:~# gluster volume get glvol_samba features.show-snapshot-directory
features.show-snapshot-directory???????? on
root at B741:~# gluster volume get glvol_samba features.uss
features.uss???????????????????????????? enable
I found an error when the samba client is mounting the gluster volume in
the gluster logs
2023 May 25
1
vfs_shadow_copy2 cannot read/find snapshots
On Wed, 2023-05-24 at 14:38 +0200, Sebastian Neustein via samba wrote:
> > In addition to that there will be a log file corresponding to the
> > FUSE mount of GlusterFS volume under /var/log/glusterfs with mount
> > point as log file name? Please check if there are any warning/error
> > entries while trying to list previous versions from windows.
> Yes, there is a file
2023 Aug 10
2
orphaned snapshots
I?ve never had such situation and I don?t recall someone sharing something similar.
Most probably it?s easier to remove the node from the TSP and re-add it.Of course , test the case in VMs just to validate that it?s possible to add a mode to a cluster with snapshots.
I have a vague feeling that you will need to delete all snapshots.
Best Regards,Strahil Nikolov?
On Thursday, August 10, 2023, 4:36
2023 May 25
1
vfs_shadow_copy2 cannot read/find snapshots
> Does it make a difference if you re-mount the volume without 'acl'
> option? Even otherwise can you try listing the snapshot contents from
> the server as a user(and not super user) who in reality tries to list
> previous versions from Windows? I feel like it has something to do with
> permissions setup for the user accessing the share.
It does make a difference! First
2023 May 22
1
vfs_shadow_copy2 cannot read/find snapshots
22 May 2023 8:11:33 pm Sebastian Neustein via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>:
> I found an error when the samba client is mounting the gluster volume in the gluster logs (/var/log/glusterfs/snaps/glvol_samba/snapd.log)
> [2023-05-22 12:52:09.438169 +0000] E [server-handshake.c:156:server_first_lookup] 0-snapd-glvol_samba: lookup on root failed: argument is not valid
> (the last
2023 May 22
1
vfs_shadow_copy2 cannot read/find snapshots
On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 9:32?AM Sebastian Neustein via samba
<samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Alexander
>
> # net conf delparm projects shadow:snapprefix
> does not change a thing. The error persists. (I killed my smb session
> before trying again).
>
> log still says:
> [2023/05/22 15:23:23.324179, 1]
>
2023 May 26
1
vfs_shadow_copy2 cannot read/find snapshots
On Thu, 2023-05-25 at 16:45 +0200, Sebastian Neustein wrote:
> > Does it make a difference if you re-mount the volume without 'acl'
> > option? Even otherwise can you try listing the snapshot contents
> > from the server as a user(and not super user) who in reality tries
> > to list previous versions from Windows? I feel like it has
> > something to do with
2023 Aug 09
1
orphaned snapshots
Hi
Due to an outage of one node, after bringing it up again, the node has
some orphaned snapshosts, which are already deleted on the other nodes.
How can I delete these orphaned snapshots? Trying the normal way
produceses these errors:
|[2023-08-08 19:34:03.667109 +0000] E [MSGID: 106115]
[glusterd-mgmt.c:118:gd_mgmt_v3_collate_errors] 0-management: Pre
Validation failed on B742. Please
2017 May 31
1
Snapshot auto-delete unmount problem
Hi I am having a problem deleting snapshots, gluster is failing to unmount
them. I am running centos 7.3 with gluster-3.10.2-1
here is some log output:
[2017-05-31 09:21:39.961371] W [MSGID: 106057]
[glusterd-snapshot-utils.c:410:glusterd_snap_volinfo_find] 0-management:
Snap volume
331ec972f90d494d8a86dd4f69d718b7.glust01-li.run-gluster-snaps-331ec972f90d494d8a86dd4f69d718b7-brick1-b
not found
2023 Aug 21
1
...or howto change vfs_acl_xattr options inplace without changing access rights
On 8/18/23 09:55, Sebastian Neustein via samba wrote:
> With the default settings of vfs_acl_xattr samba takes posix acls into
> account when delivering data - how can I activate
> "acl_xattr:ignore system acls = yes"
> without loosing the information saved in posix acls? Background: our
> future file system won't be able to support acls.
Sorry, but this is
2024 Jan 31
1
Behavior of acl_xattr:ignore system acls = yes on a share
Does you filesystem support extended attributes? What does "|getfattr -n
security.NTACL |filename" return?||
On 30.01.2024 16:13, Peter Milesson wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> It seems that the setting acl_xattr:ignore system acls = yes reduces
> Windows compatibility when defined for a share. In all attempts I have
> used Windows tools (except editing smb.conf)
>
> Assume
2024 Jan 30
2
Behavior of acl_xattr:ignore system acls = yes on a share
Hi folks,
It seems that the setting acl_xattr:ignore system acls = yes reduces
Windows compatibility when defined for a share. In all attempts I have
used Windows tools (except editing smb.conf)
Assume there is a share, where the files and folders in the share root
should at least be readable by anybody having access to the share. For
the sake of simplicity the following permissions apply on
2015 Feb 10
1
DNS synchronisation problems
Hi,
I have replications problems on one of my server. Replication was working
since month and yet stopped working.
on the remote server:
islad01:~ # samba-tool drs showrepl | more
Default-First-Site-Name\ISLAD01
DSA Options: 0x00000001
DSA object GUID: 3fe6bc7c-1116-4344-96a6-c58c43bc217f
DSA invocationId: 89351eec-7207-45f5-b6b9-cebfcacfd0e3
==== INBOUND NEIGHBORS ====
2023 Aug 21
1
...or howto change vfs_acl_xattr options inplace without changing access rights
Hi Ralph
> On 8/18/23 09:55, Sebastian Neustein via samba wrote:
>> With the default settings of vfs_acl_xattr samba takes posix acls
>> into account when delivering data - how can I activate
>> "acl_xattr:ignore system acls = yes"
>> without loosing the information saved in posix acls? Background: our
>> future file system won't be able to support
2008 Jul 30
2
unable to map windows to unix groups
Hello.
After fresh install.
Samba and ldap seems to run normally ( I can join win2k workstation to linux
samba pdc ).
Using yast I create a system group named domadmin
But I am unable to map "Domain Admins" to domadmin
I am unable to map "Domain Admins" to existing ntadmin group
I am unable to mofify mapping "Domain Admins" to domadmin group
Thank you for
2004 Jan 08
4
Add a preamble to documentation
Hi list, hi John,
having seen last week a post (see
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?m=107341768923846) that remind me some
quirks I encountered, I'd like to see a preamble added to the chapter 12
of the howto. It concerns the diffent types of admin you will need in a
PDC setup.
I say preamble, but it could be found anywhere else, as long as it could
be found (I have lost long hours
2004 Mar 25
1
domain admins and Samba 3.0.2
Hi
I've been running Samba 2.x for years but decided to move up to 3.0.2. I've set
up a new samba server with a workgroup NEWBIOSS and netbios name PARETO.
Im having problems setting up my domain admins.
I used
'net groupmap modify "Domain Admins" unixgroup=domadmin'
my 'net groupmap list' shows :
System Operators (S-1-5-32-549) -> -1
Replicators
2004 Sep 08
4
machine account with w2k
Dear Samba Friends,
I've a problem to join with Windows2000-Clients a Samba-PDC.
When I join the samba-pdc with a WinNT4.0-Client it is no problem, first
I create a machine-account for the machine:
1. in /etc/group exists the group: machines:x:515:
2. useradd -g machines -d /dev/null -c nickname -s /bin/false neuch205$
3. pdbedit -a -m -u neuch205
In this way, it isn't a problem to join