similar to: ZFS Uptime/Availability?

Under Solaris 10 on a 4 core Sun Ultra 40 with 20GB RAM, I am setting up a Sun StorageTek 2540 with 12 300GB 15K RPM SAS drives and connected via load-shared 4Gbit FC links. This week I have tried many different configurations, using firmware managed RAID, ZFS managed RAID, and with the controller cache enabled or disabled. My objective is to obtain the best single-file write performance.

> On Mar 5, 2018, at 6:41 PM, Atin Mukherjee <amukherj at redhat.com> wrote: > I'm tempted to repeat - down things, copy the checksum the "good" ones agree on, start things; but given that this has turned into a balloon-squeezing exercise, I want to make sure I'm not doing this the wrong way. > > Yes, that's the way. Copy

Hello everyone, I am currently running Dovecot as a high performance solution to a particular kind of problem. My userbase is small, but it murders email servers. The volume is moderate, but message retention requirements are stringent, to put it nicely. Many users receive a high volume of email traffic, but want to keep every message, and *search* them. This produces mail accounts up to

I've just compiled 2.5.6 release on Tru64 V5.0A (configure detects alphaev67-dec-osf5.0, gcc release is a 3.1.1). rsync fails using rsync://<hostname>/ syntax. > lct@goliath(32) [rsync-2.5.6]$ ./rsync rsync://stitch/ > rsync: getaddrinfo: stitch 873: servname not supported for ai_socktype > rsync error: error in socket IO (code 10) at clientserver.c(83) Is there anyone else

I am looking at writing a program using php that after X number of days (eg 60 days) a speex file is created that has all the speex file in a set folder with a bit of text to speech between the file for id reasons the speex file in the folder are deleted once done based on what I have read (corrent me if Im wrong): I need to convert the speex files to wav files (executable program), then I can

Hi, There isn't a way to replace the failing tier brick through a single command as we don't have support for replace/ remove or add brick with tier. Once you bring the brick online(volume start force), the data in the brick will be built by the self heal daemon (Done because its a replicated tier). But adding brick will still not work. Else if you use the force option, it will work as

There are several messages "no space left on device". I would check first that free disk space is available for the volume. On Oct 22, 2017 18:42, "Milind Changire" <mchangir at redhat.com> wrote: > Herb, > What are the high and low watermarks for the tier set at ? > > # gluster volume get <vol> cluster.watermark-hi > > # gluster volume get

Hi, Have a glusterfs 3.10.10 (tried 3.12.6 as well) volume on Ubuntu 16.04 with a 3 ssd tier where one ssd is bad. Status of volume: labgreenbin Gluster process TCP Port RDMA Port Online Pid ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Hot Bricks: Brick labgfs81:/gfs/p1-tier/mount 49156 0 Y 4217 Brick

Herb, I'm trying to weed out issues here. So, I can see quota turned *on* and would like you to check the quota settings and test to see system behavior *if quota is turned off*. Although the file size that failed migration was 29K, I'm being a bit paranoid while weeding out issues. Are you still facing tiering errors ? I can see your response to Alex with the disk space consumption and

Herb, What are the high and low watermarks for the tier set at ? # gluster volume get <vol> cluster.watermark-hi # gluster volume get <vol> cluster.watermark-low What is the size of the file that failed to migrate as per the following tierd log: [2017-10-19 17:52:07.519614] I [MSGID: 109038] [tier.c:1169:tier_migrate_using_query_file] 0-<vol>-tier-dht: Promotion failed for

Does anyone have any ideas about how to fix, or to work-around the following issue? Thanks! Bug 1549714 - On sharded tiered volume, only first shard of new file goes on hot tier. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1549714 On sharded tiered volume, only first shard of new file goes on hot tier. On a sharded tiered volume, only the first shard of a new file goes on the hot tier, the rest

Thanks for the info, Hari. Sorry about the bad gluster volume info, I grabbed that from a file not realizing it was out of date. Here's a current configuration showing the active hot tier: [root at pod-sjc1-gluster1 ~]# gluster volume info Volume Name: gv0 Type: Tier Volume ID: d490a9ec-f9c8-4f10-a7f3-e1b6d3ced196 Status: Started Snapshot Count: 13 Number of Bricks: 8 Transport-type: tcp Hot

Milind - Thank you for the response.. >> What are the high and low watermarks for the tier set at ? # gluster volume get <vol> cluster.watermark-hi Option Value ------ ----- cluster.watermark-hi 90 # gluster volume get <vol> cluster.watermark-low Option

Please run 'gluster v get all cluster.max-op-version' and what ever value it throws up should be used to bump up the cluster.op-version (gluster v set all cluster.op-version <value>) . With that if you restart the rejected peer I believe the problem should go away, if it doesn't I'd need to investigate further once you can pass down the glusterd and cmd_history log files and

Hi, The actual data will be in the hot tier only till demotion. The file that you see on the cold tier is just a linkto file of the file on the hot tier. These linkto file are necessary for the internal working of the tier. On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 1:16 PM, Sherin George <allmyforums at outlook.in> wrote: > Hi Guys > > Got a quick question regarding hot tier and cold tier. > I

All, I am new to gluster and have some questions/concerns about some tiering errors that I see in the log files. OS: CentOs 7.3.1611 Gluster version: 3.10.5 Samba version: 4.6.2 I see the following (scrubbed): Node 1 /var/log/glusterfs/tier/<vol>/tierd.log: [2017-10-19 17:52:07.519614] I [MSGID: 109038] [tier.c:1169:tier_migrate_using_query_file] 0-<vol>-tier-dht: Promotion failed

Hi, We will look into the " failed to get index" error. It shouldn't affect the normal working. Do let us know if you face any other issues. Regards, Hari. On 02-Aug-2017 11:55 PM, "Dmitri Chebotarov" <4dimach at gmail.com> wrote: Hello I reattached hot tier to a new empty EC volume and started to copy data to the volume. Good news is I can see files now on SSD

I should add that additional testing has shown that only accessing files is held up, IO is not interrupted for existing transfers. I think this points to the heat metadata in the sqlite DB for the tier, is it possible that a table is temporarily locked while the promotion daemon runs so the calls to update the access count on files are blocked? On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 10:17 AM, Tom Fite

I've recently enabled an SSD backed 2 TB hot tier on my 150 TB 2 server / 3 bricks per server distributed replicated volume. I'm seeing IO get blocked across all client FUSE threads for 10 to 15 seconds while the promotion daemon runs. I see the 'glustertierpro' thread jump to 99% CPU usage on both boxes when these delays occur and they happen every 25 minutes (my

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Viktor Nosov" <vnosov at stonefly.com> > To: gluster-users at gluster.org > Cc: vnosov at stonefly.com > Sent: Friday, December 8, 2017 5:45:25 PM > Subject: [Gluster-users] Testing sharding on tiered volume > > Hi, > > I'm looking to use sharding on tiered volume. This is very attractive > feature that could