similar to: ACL permissions on 2 Servers

I have two GlusterFS server and the volume status is replica . The add of them are server01:192.168.1.10 and server02:192.168.1.11 . The client mount the server01'vol and I can use the GLusterFS usually. Now, l am reading the file on the glusterfs volume usually, the server02's interface down suddenly ? and the client is also down. It will resume after a delay(about 10s),I think

Hi, I'am new to ocfs2 filesystem and I have some questions about it. I installed three server according to the user guide from http://oss.oracle.com/projects/ocfs2/dist/documentation/v1.4/ocfs2-1_4-usersguide.pdf For every single server I have a working ocfs2 partition /dev/sdb1 on /mnt/oc1 type ocfs2 (rw,_netdev,heartbeat=local) As I understand the ocfs2 system I can use now these

Am 11.02.19 um 14:22 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 13:46:05 +0100 > Matthias Leopold via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> >> >> Am 11.02.19 um 13:22 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: >>> On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 12:30:51 +0100 >>> Matthias Leopold via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >>>

Hi On 5.3 i have a situation where some boxes have been 3 or 4 seconds out and restarting ntpd has fixed the issue. What i dont understand is why the clocks did not drift to the correct time when the config seems correct in that restarting ntp did correct the time. Is there something 'special' i need to do in order for the drift to work? $ cat /etc/ntp.conf restrict default

Hi, I haven't found anything about the message below on the mailing list, Does anyones knows why this notice is being appearing? -- Executing Dial("Local/912365533643@default-f348,2", "IAX2/CallOut/12365533643|30|otT") in new stack -- Called CallOut/12365533643 -- Call accepted by 12.11.11.11 (format ulaw) -- Format for call is ulaw --

Am 11.02.19 um 13:22 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 12:30:51 +0100 > Matthias Leopold via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> we are using a _single_ LDAP server as backend for _multiple_ Samba >> standalone file servers (security=user). This LDAP server serves >> mainly other purposes and access for Samba is

Hi, we are using a _single_ LDAP server as backend for _multiple_ Samba standalone file servers (security=user). This LDAP server serves mainly other purposes and access for Samba is read only so the situation is not optimal but "it works for us". Still I don't understand one phenomenon concerning visibility of LDAP groups. The LDAP configuration in smb.conf for all our Samba

Am 11.02.19 um 16:33 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 15:40:02 +0100 > Matthias Leopold via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> >> >> Am 11.02.19 um 14:22 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: >>> On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 13:46:05 +0100 >>> Matthias Leopold via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >>>

Hi list, is it possible to add multiple homedir templates to smb.conf ? I have a running linuxsystem where homefilesets are mounted from different windows-servers to subdirs like: /home/server01/home/USERNAME /home/server02/home/USERNAME /home/server03/home/USERNAME The users come via winbind. In the smb.conf the entry for the homedir: template homedir = /home/%U So how is it possible to

config smb.conf [global] realm = DOMAINB workgroup = DOMAINB security = ADS template homedir = /home/%U template shell = /bin/bash winbind expand groups = 1 winbind separator = + winbind use default domain = Yes idmap config domainb : range = 3000001 - 4000000 idmap config domainb : backend = rid idmap config domainc : range = 2000001 - 3000000 idmap config domainc : backend = rid

Hi all. What is the best hardware configuration to handle this following scenario? - 4 IVR menu with conference applications for each option; - Only SIP/g711 user access - 3500 simultaneous users(800 at the beginning) - No ZAP channels Where is the most important point of failure? CPU? Ethernet? RAM? Im planning to separate in three servers: Server01: 01 Xeon 3Ghz getting the 1st level of

# wbinfo -n working-group | awk '{print $1}' | awk -F '-' '{print $8}' 69153 # wbinfo -n problem-group | awk '{print $1}' | awk -F '-' '{print $8}' 136399 The OS can use that group:- # chgrp problem-group test.txt # ls -asl test.txt 0 -rw-r--r-- 1 root problem-group 0 Aug 25 17:55 test.txt # It's not a case that the group is unavailable...

Hi , I would really appreciate some suggestions re the following issue. We have a LDAP based PDC and a member server. We're use libnss_ldap to auth the users. The LDAP PDC is setup with self signed SSL , we're trying make sure the member server connects to the PDC using SSL. Here is the PDC , smb.conf [global] workgroup = SUNTECH netbios name = SERVER01 security = USER local master =

On Sat, 11 Aug 2018 12:47:19 +0000 Praveen Ghimire <PGhimire at sundata.com.au> wrote: > Hi Rowland, > > Thank you for that. > > As mentioned we have some other issues, would appreciate your input > for these > > Server02: Samba 3.x: old PDC now file server > Server01: Samba 4.x , new PDC and LDAP > > We're using libnss_ldap(both Server02 and

hi folks, after long trying i need some help from the big world :-) question ******** when I boot a guest system, tried debian 6.0.2 amd64 firmware, I get errors like: 1) after click install on debian 6.0.2 installer [0.642450] vbd vbd-5632: 19 xenbus_dev_probe on device/vbd/5632 [0.642911] vbd vbd-5632: failed to write error node for device/vbd/5632 (19 xenbus_dev_probe on device/vbd/5632) 2)

hi folks, after long trying i need some help from the big world :-) question ******** when I boot a guest system, tried debian 6.0.2 amd64 firmware, I get errors like: 1) after click install on debian 6.0.2 installer [0.642450] vbd vbd-5632: 19 xenbus_dev_probe on device/vbd/5632 [0.642911] vbd vbd-5632: failed to write error node for device/vbd/5632 (19 xenbus_dev_probe on device/vbd/5632) 2)

Hi, Here is a crash that's happening using the latest Dovecot version (v2.2.27 on CentOS7 x86_64): We are using replication. Judging by the second server's logs, I believe this has something to do with the fact that we're using the lazy_expunge plugin. Every night after midnight, we purge the lazy_expunge namespace by running a command similar to following one on the main server

Hi Rowland, The test environment is totally isolated and we testing with images of the client machines. We're just trying to iron out any issues post the PDC role move. We have a small list we are going through. The SSL bit is one of them. Once the new environment is stable, we'll be migratingto AD. Regards, Praveen Ghimire -------- Original message -------- From: Rowland Penny

I have an OpenLDAP backend, Samba knows how to talk to it, my Samba users are stored in LDAP and file shares work fine authenticating to the LDAP server. I tried executing smbldap-useradd -w server02 on the command-line and got the following error: failed to perform search; Can't contact LDAP server at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.7/smbldap_tools.pm line 362, <DATA> line 283. Error

Hello ! I have joined my samba 3.0.32 samba server to a windows 2003 domain = controller. All works well and all users are mapped etc etc. Now is the server situated on a remote location. My question is can it handle domain logons for the remote location or = can this only be done by the 2003 server. the reason is that the connection between both locations is sometimes = out of order. =20