similar to: [Bug 1680] New: Trying to delete offloaded flow with conntrack results in EBUSY

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 600 matches similar to: "[Bug 1680] New: Trying to delete offloaded flow with conntrack results in EBUSY"

2006 Jan 05
4
ylim problem in barplot
R Version 2.2.0 Platform: Windows When I use barplot but select a ylim value greater than zero, the graph is distorted. The bars extend below the bottom of the graph. For instance the command produces a problematic graph. barplot(c(200,300,250,350),ylim=c(150,400)) Any help would be appreciated. Paul [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
2004 Aug 06
3
perl libshout
Hi, I've just completed a conversion of the perl Shout-1.0 library to something that will talk to an icecast2 server. I'll be submitting the results for inclusion back to the icecast site. One thing is missing: proper metadata support. this feature has changed since icecast 1; previously it was a single string. now, it's a linked list of key/value pairs.
2004 Aug 06
2
shoutcast perl module
Hi I've recently upgraded the Perl Shout v1.0 library to accomodate the new libshout and icecast2 formats. I have a tarball I'd like to submit; who might I send it to? Thanks, -paulb =========================================================================== paulb@oasis-software.com "I'm fuzzy on this whole good/bad thing" paulb@foobox.com
2004 Aug 06
2
metadata handling
I'm trying to using metadata now in my application that uses libshout, and am seeing curious behaviour. my icecast2 log says: -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= [2003-04-03 08:45:50] INFO connection/_handle_source_request Source logging in at mountpoint "/cajun" [2003-04-03 08:45:50] DBUG source/source_main Source creation complete [2003-04-03
2007 Nov 23
3
[LLVMdev] LLVM 2.1 (or later) and Ubuntu Gutsy
Antony Blakey wrote: > On 24/11/2007, at 12:01 AM, Michael T. Richter wrote: > >> Does anybody have a working version of LLVM 2.1+ (ideally in a .deb >> file) that they're willing to share? I'm having some weird problems >> trying to get a working version on my 7.10 machine. > > Or even better, does anyone have a recipe for building on Gutsy? I've just
2007 Nov 23
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM 2.1 (or later) and Ubuntu Gutsy
On 24/11/2007, at 9:33 AM, John van Schie wrote: > Antony Blakey wrote: >> On 24/11/2007, at 12:01 AM, Michael T. Richter wrote: >> >>> Does anybody have a working version of LLVM 2.1+ (ideally in a .deb >>> file) that they're willing to share? I'm having some weird problems >>> trying to get a working version on my 7.10 machine. >>
2007 Nov 29
2
[LLVMdev] LLVM on MinGW
Antony Blakey wrote: > SVN head LLVM and Clang built out of the box for me a week ago on > MSYS/MINGW, using the following files: Ok, I tried to do the same. The compilations stops with the following error message (actually, I got to the same point in my attempt to build LLVM with the MinGW compiler shipped with Cygwin): llvm[1]: Compiling MachineLoopInfo.cpp for Debug build
2006 Jul 08
4
Application generation
I love rails but I want more. :-) I''d like a generator that generates a complete application. It would read an information model, and from it generate the MVC''s with a validation-constrained model, errors and exceptions, page navigation and rich view layout... The information model would be represented by ruby "meta" classes, and could be generated as an
2007 Nov 23
3
[LLVMdev] LLVM 2.1 (or later) and Ubuntu Gutsy
Does anybody have a working version of LLVM 2.1+ (ideally in a .deb file) that they're willing to share? I'm having some weird problems trying to get a working version on my 7.10 machine.
2007 Nov 23
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM 2.1 (or later) and Ubuntu Gutsy
On 24/11/2007, at 12:01 AM, Michael T. Richter wrote: > Does anybody have a working version of LLVM 2.1+ (ideally in a .deb > file) that they're willing to share? I'm having some weird problems > trying to get a working version on my 7.10 machine. Or even better, does anyone have a recipe for building on Gutsy? Antony Blakey ------------- CTO, Linkuistics Pty Ltd Ph: 0438 840
2007 Nov 28
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM on MinGW
SVN head LLVM and Clang built out of the box for me a week ago on MSYS/ MINGW, using the following files: MinGW-5.1.3.exe MSYS-1.0.10.exe msysDTK-1.0.1.exe bash-3.1-MSYS-1.0.11-1.tar.bz2 bison-2.3-MSYS-1.0.11.tar.bz2 coreutils-5.97-MSYS-1.0.11-snapshot.tar.bz2 flex-2.5.33-MSYS-1.0.11.tar.bz2 gawk-3.1.5-MSYS-1.0.11-snapshot.tar.bz2 regex-0.12-MSYS-1.0.11.tar.bz2 1. install these components 2.
2007 Nov 09
1
[LLVMdev] Newbie JITter
Thanks Evan. On 09/11/2007, at 6:50 PM, Evan Cheng wrote: >> 1. What optimization passes, if any, should I run on the module >> before I pass it to the ExecutionEngine. > > The default JIt driver, lli, runs everything. My reading of the lli source indicates that it's not explicitly doing any opt passes - is that happening implicitly in the ExecutionEngine? I can see
2007 Nov 28
5
[LLVMdev] LLVM on MinGW
Hello, I'm trying to use LLVM on Windows, using the MinGW toolchain that comes with Cygwin (gcc -mno-cygwin, not the standalone msys package). Has anyone successfully built LLVM from sources with this toolchain? The ./configure scripts automatically detects a Cygwin environment. I've spent some time trying to let it know that it should compile for MinGW. FWIW, here's what I've
2007 Nov 08
3
[LLVMdev] Newbie JITter
Hi, I'm experimenting with using LLVM to generate dynamic FFI bridges in VisualWorks Smalltalk. LLVM is an amazing thing! I'm going from dynamically generated assembler source to machine code, and I have that all working, copied from the llc tool and the JIT example. I have two questions: 1. What optimization passes, if any, should I run on the module before I pass it to the
2007 Nov 23
1
[LLVMdev] LLVM 2.1 (or later) and Ubuntu Gutsy
Antony Blakey schreef: > I installed gutsy desktop, and llvm svn head (which compiles for me on > MacIntel and Win32. The problem I encounter is with gcc. The llvm > config executes gcc -V, which on my installation fails because -V > requires an argument. This leads configure to think that the compiler > cannot produce executables. > > I'm not au fait with the gcc
2007 Nov 23
1
[LLVMdev] LLVM 2.1 (or later) and Ubuntu Gutsy
Antony Blakey wrote: > On 24/11/2007, at 12:01 AM, Michael T. Richter wrote: > > >> Does anybody have a working version of LLVM 2.1+ (ideally in a .deb >> file) that they're willing to share? I'm having some weird problems >> trying to get a working version on my 7.10 machine. >> > > Or even better, does anyone have a recipe for building on
2002 Mar 13
1
rsync over commercial SSH?
I get the following error running rsync 2.5.2 on AIX 4.3 in combination with SSH Secure Shell 2.3.0. > rsync -e ssh myuserid@localhost:/tmp myuserid's password: /bin/ksh: rsync: not found. unexpected EOF in read_timeout This is using the SSH Communications Security Corp version of ssh. I also get the same error talking to another host which is also running commercial ssh. Note: my PATH
2007 Nov 09
0
[LLVMdev] Newbie JITter
On Nov 7, 2007, at 6:10 PM, Antony Blakey wrote: > Hi, > I'm experimenting with using LLVM to generate dynamic FFI bridges > in VisualWorks Smalltalk. LLVM is an amazing thing! I'm going from > dynamically generated assembler source to machine code, and I have > that all working, copied from the llc tool and the JIT example. I > have two questions: > > 1. What
2024 Apr 04
5
[Bug 1743] New: Flowtable: Flows exiting OFFLOAD State being assigned value of nf_conntrack_tcp_timeout_unacknowledged
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1743 Bug ID: 1743 Summary: Flowtable: Flows exiting OFFLOAD State being assigned value of nf_conntrack_tcp_timeout_unacknowledged Product: nftables Version: 1.0.x Hardware: x86_64 OS: other Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority:
2004 Apr 28
1
2.5.7 vs 2.6.1 interoperability bug
Hi all - I've got two red hat linux 7.3 systems. On each i have the redhat-provided 2.5.7 in the standard location, and a locally built copy of 2.6.1 in /usr/local/pkg. I'm implementing a remote-backup-to-disk setup. blakey is the "client" (source of rsync), verve is the "server" (dest of rsync). When i take care to match rsync binary versions (2.5.7 on each