similar to: Question regaring correct usage of CPU shares

Hi, I'm using libvirt and qemu on Debian Wheezy. I'm having a strange behavior. Guests can't connect to each other when they're on the same host. On the host I'm using bonding (in active / backup mode) and vlan. It looks like this : eth0 \ / macvtap0 bond0 --- vlan222 eth1 / \ macvtap1 So I've got two guests, let's say A and B. When

Hello, so the current domain configuration: <cpu mode='host-passthrough'><topology sockets='8' cores='4' threads='1'/><numa><cell cpus='0-3' memory='62000000' /><cell cpus='4-7' memory='62000000' /><cell cpus='8-11' memory='62000000' /><cell cpus='12-15'

Hello, ok, I found that cpu pinning was wrong, so I corrected it to be 1:1. The issue with iozone remains the same. The spec is running, however, it runs slower than 1-NUMA case. The corrected XML looks like follows: <cpu mode='host-passthrough'><topology sockets='8' cores='4' threads='1'/><numa><cell cpus='0-3'

Hello again, when the iozone writes slow. This is how slabtop looks like: 62476752 62476728 0% 0.10K 1601968 39 6407872K buffer_head 1000678 999168 0% 0.56K 142954 7 571816K radix_tree_node 132184 125911 0% 0.03K 1066 124 4264K kmalloc-32 118496 118224 0% 0.12K 3703 32 14812K kmalloc-node 73206 56467 0% 0.19K 3486 21

On 09/14/2018 03:36 PM, Lukas Hejtmanek wrote: > Hello, > > ok, I found that cpu pinning was wrong, so I corrected it to be 1:1. The issue > with iozone remains the same. > > The spec is running, however, it runs slower than 1-NUMA case. > > The corrected XML looks like follows: [Reformated XML for better reading] <cpu mode="host-passthrough">

On 09/17/2018 04:59 PM, Lukas Hejtmanek wrote: > Hello, > > so the current domain configuration: > <cpu mode='host-passthrough'><topology sockets='8' cores='4' threads='1'/><numa><cell cpus='0-3' memory='62000000' /><cell cpus='4-7' memory='62000000' /><cell cpus='8-11'

Hello, I have cluster with AMD EPYC 7351 cpu. Two CPUs per node. I have performance 8-NUMA configuration: This is from hypervizor: [root@hde10 ~]# lscpu Architecture: x86_64 CPU op-mode(s): 32-bit, 64-bit Byte Order: Little Endian CPU(s): 64 On-line CPU(s) list: 0-63 Thread(s) per core: 2 Core(s) per socket: 16 Socket(s): 2 NUMA

On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 08:51:39AM -0500, Eric Blake wrote: > > > > I migrated a Windows 7 VM with libvirtd tunnelled, the VM halted > > on the target although the status is running. What do you mean by halted ? The guest OS has shutdown, or QEMU has crashed, or something else ? > > > > > > [root@test15 ~]# virsh migrate --live --p2p --tunnelled

On 02/11/2014 04:45 PM, Cole Robinson wrote: > On 02/10/2014 06:46 PM, Chris Friesen wrote: >> Hi, >> >> We've run into a problem with libvirt 1.1.2 and are looking for some comments >> on whether this is a bug or design intent. >> >> We're trying to use migrateToURI() but we're using a few things (numatune, >> vcpu mask, etc.) that may need

Is it possible to use virsh to set the cpuset attribute of the CPU Allocation element in a domain ? <domain> ... <vcpu placement='static' cpuset="1-4,^3,6" current="1">2</vcpu> ... </domain> I have seen that virsh vcpupin and virsh emulatorpin can be used to query and set the cpusets of the <vcpupin> and <emulatorpin>

Hi, I have found the cpu time partitioning based on cpu shares weights not very intuitive. On RHEL64, I deployed two qemu/kvm VMs VM1 with 1 vcpu and 512 cpu shares VM2 with 2 vcpus and 1024 cpu shares I pinned their vcpus to specific host pcpus: VM1 vcpu 0 to host pcpu1 VM2 vcpu 0 to host pcpu1, VM2 vcpu 1 to host pcpu2 I executed inside the VMs a simple process that consume all

Thank you, that's it! virsh vol-list storage VM1   /dev/storage/VM1.img VM2   /dev/storage/VM2.img VM3   /dev/storage/VM3.img [dead] VM4   /dev/storage/VM4.img [dead] A last stupid question (I don't want to make a big mistake ...): Is virsh vol-delete VM3 virsh vol-delete VM4 the right command to get rid of the offending ones? Am 14.05.2020 um 19:10 schrieb Alvin Starr: > >

I am running NOX controller with a python script that prints out the destination mac and the source mac for each packet arriving at the now controller and then floods it out. So here's what happening: With em1 connected, all the packets that arrive at em1 are coming to the controller and printing out the details. However, without em1 connected to the OVS, when I have the following setup:

Hi all, I upgraded qemu-kvm and libvirt to the new versions qemu-kvm at : 1.0 libvirt at : git version 0.9.10 I lost the original machines but the xml files were are all present (it is not showing up in virsh list --all) But when I import an xml I get an error: Attached is some information which might be helpful Can someone help please ? If this is a compatibility issue please can

Hi, I'm using virsh to instance a VM in my environment, but I'm running on some issues. I created the following domain file: <domain type='kvm'> <name>demovm</name> <uuid>4a9b3f53-fa2a-47f3-a757-dd87720d9d1d</uuid> <memory unit='KiB'>4194304</memory> <currentMemory

[moderator note: I'm forwarding a stripped down version of the original mail which was rejected in the moderator queue. I stripped the 3.3 megabyte .tar.bz2 of the log file attachment, which is inappropriate for a technical list. Either trim the log to the relevant portion, or host the log externally and have your list email merely give a URL of the externally-hosted file] >

libvirt-users@redhat.com TCP Tunnel Info I've been looking at the TCP Tunnel network feature as a potential replacement for the extra private internal networking configuration file. Usecase: This network is supposed to go from VM1 to VM2 without DHCP, DNS or any incoming/outgoing connections to the host or outside world possible. https://libvirt.org/formatdomain.html#elementsNICSTCP *

Libvirt doesn't care about security during hot add disk images. It even accepts addition of disk images of other guest running on the host. Steps followed to create this scenario : Started two VMs with following security configurations: vm1: <seclabel type='dynamic' model='selinux' relabel='yes'>

HI I have 15 vm (libvirt + kvm) with a network brigde and ip address like 192.168.0.1 VM1 192.168.0.2 VM2 192.168.0.3 VM3 ..... The vm are use by other people and I want to be sure that if someone change the ip of VM3 to 192.168.0.1 it will filter it network traffic for him and can't flood the VM1 What the best way to achieve this Hope I m clear enough

Hi Michael, Looks like the discussions tapered off, but do you have a plan to implement this if people are eventually fine with it? We want to extend this to support multiple VMs. On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 11:35 AM, Nakajima, Jun <jun.nakajima at intel.com> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 7:11 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: >> Hello! >> During the KVM