similar to: Windows Guest on KVM running "single core" after windows update

On 5/9/23 9:59 AM, Marc wrote: >> I have a Windows 10 pro (64bit) long time running as a libvirt/KVM guest >> that I think Windows Update finally narfed. >> >> The hardware is a supermicro motherboard with dual Intel E5-2640 CPUs >> for a total of 40 threads and 64GB >> >> The guest is allocated 2sockets, 5cores, 2 threads and 32GB of RAM. >>

Hi I just upgraded my system to xen-3.0-testing, hoping it would solve my problems with the virtual network interfaceses (I cannot connect between two domains) and memory usage (I sometime "miss" a few hundret megabytes). The update didn''t help on the networking issues, but it did on memory usage. However, I created a new problem: using htop, the cpu is used at 50% in both

Perhaps this is a known problem, and if so, hopefully it is fixed in 3.x: Win2K SP4 clients, Samba 2.2.8a servers on Linux using ACL support with XFS filesystem (Redhat SGI-XFS build, and Mandrake 9.2). Adding/editing an ACL for an NT domain group to a folder on samba, and attempting to apply permissions to all subdirs and files only goes one level deep when using the win2k standard gui tool.

Dear all, I run different R versions (3.2.1, 3.2.2 and 3.2.3) on different platforms (Arch, Ubuntu, Debian) with a different number of available cores (24, 4, 24). The following line produces very different behavior on the three machines: for(i in 1:1e6) {n <- 100; M <- matrix(rnorm(n^2), n, n); M %*% M} On the Ubuntu and Arch machine one core is used, but on the Debian machine ALL

Hi list ! We have a very busy webserver hosted in a clustered environment where the document root and data is on a GFS2 partition off a fiber-attached disk array. Now on busy moments, I can see in htop, nmon that there is a fair percentage of cpu that is waiting for I/O. In nmon, I can spot that the most busy block device correspond to our gfs2 partition where many times, it shows that

Hi I tried to restrict usage of some running VM by cpu.shares (i.e. set to 10 from original 1024) on loaded system and it seem doesn't work as I expected... all running processes has same CPU usage (by htop) :-/ Does anyone has same experience? Fedora 19, libvirt-1.0.5.9-1.fc19.x86_64 Thanks a lot Martin -- Martin Pavlásek <mpavlase@redhat.com> OpenStack QA Associate/Red Hat

hi, i'm testing asterisk 1.4/1.2 in the following scenario centos5/cpu quad xeon E5335 2.0Ghz - test clients behind nat - 1500+ testing instances - reregister option from 1min to 1hour - qualify set to 5000 top shows over 100% cpu. cpu cores sometimes go to 95% with htop i see ~16threads but only one child have ~95% cpu (how i can get info about that thread? what he is doing?) what is

Hi together, when I´m starting a VM my host freezes gradually. This seems to happen because its running out of memory and no other process is able to do anything. I have 16GB of ram in total. 8GB are reserved for hugepages. So for the daily business on the host I have 8GB left. I don´t run many or extraordinary consuming software on the host - normally just a gnome session and the chromium

On Sunday 19 October 2014 22:03:23 Charles Lepple did opine And Gene did reply: > Hi Gene, > > On Oct 18, 2014, at 7:35 PM, Gene Heskett <gheskett at wdtv.com> wrote: > > Greetings; > > > > I found pdf user manual which explains a few things that might help. > > > > However, for a ubuntu flavor, the various .conf etc files seem to be > > in

Greetings everybody; I have 2 questions today, but to put them in context, I'll describe the setup first. I am in the process of cnc'ing an old Sheldon metal lathe. These can make large amounts of flying metal chips & stringers when doing what they do, so its paramount that the electronics to run them are either far enough away, or put in a box thats well sealed, with fans in

On 11 Aug 2005 at 14:40, samba@lists.samba.org wrote: > Way back on Mar 10 2004, I wrote this: > > ========== > Perhaps this is a known problem, and if so, hopefully it is fixed > in 3.x: > > Win2K SP4 clients, Samba 2.2.8a servers on Linux using ACL > support with > XFS filesystem (Redhat SGI-XFS build, and Mandrake 9.2). > > Adding/editing an ACL for

Everyone, I have two x86_64 servers with CentOS 6.3 that seem to have some difficulty with the last version of bind : 32:bind-9.8.2-0.10.rc1.el6_3.2.x86_64 When I run htop I am getting a CPU usage of 70 to 80% all of the time. I am not seeing problems identified in the log files on either machine. This may have been present before the update of 9.8.2.0, but I certainly did not notice it. Has

On 12/03/2013 12:52 AM, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote: > This is about CPU affinity. You may look at CPU pinning with 'vcpupin' > in the manual of virsh. It is possible to enable vCPU pinning in libvirt > guest XML. > > Don't know if libvirt supports applying CPU affinity at guest runtime Yes, 'virsh vcpupin' can be used to change CPU affinity at runtime. > but

On Thu 06 Mar 2014 00:42:27 CET, Eric Blake wrote: > On 03/05/2014 04:32 PM, Martin Pavlásek wrote: >> Hi >> >> I tried to restrict usage of some running VM by cpu.shares (i.e. set to >> 10 from original 1024) on loaded system and it seem doesn't work as I >> expected... all running processes has same CPU usage (by htop) :-/ > > How exactly are you

I have asterisk running user a user/group asterisk/asterisk like so su - asterisk safe_asterisk and one the processes utilizes way more CPU than any other. According to htop, it used 7:59:XX of CPU time. Once I kill asterisk and restart, another process does the same thing while others are running smoothly. This doesn't look like standard behavior to me. Is this some sort of a master

I just had samba4 (git 69b3d19 from yesterday) crash while logging in as administrator. The login stalled, and on the samba4 AD DC, winbind stopped responding -- "getent passwd" stopped showing the domain entries, and commands that showed some samba users (e.g. "ls" in a directory with domain owners, "htop", etc.) would hang. dmesg shows: traps: samba[3728] trap

Hello Guys, Last Sunday I had the idea to expand my gameplay btrfs. Now what was missing was a yum plugin which worked like arch or opensuse. Ok, I told myself and learned a little python. Also something for grub2 to boot into a snapshot. My results are up on: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/andybe/Centos7Btrfs/ grub2-btrfs (do not use grub-btrfs, this is the version before)

Greetings; I found pdf user manual which explains a few things that might help. However, for a ubuntu flavor, the various .conf etc files seem to be in /etc/nut. But this pdf says they are in /usr/local/ups/etc, and yes indeed there are some there, with the .sample files being owned by root, and the rest are user 503, whoever he may be. Are these just a sample storage in case one needs to

Dear R-devel, I am running mclapply with many iterations over a function that modifies nothing and makes no copies of anything. It is taking up a lot of memory, so it seems to me like this is a bug. Should I post this to bugs.r-project.org? A minimal reproducible example can be obtained by first starting a memory monitoring program such as htop, and then executing the following code while

Hi All, I've been tuning a server recently and just today this has started to appear in my top/htop output. [root at db1 ~]# ps -aux | grep kernel root 1011 0.0 0.0 212048 4532 ? Ss 13:34 0:00 /usr/bin/abrt-watch-log -F BUG: WARNING: at WARNING: CPU: INFO: possible recursive locking detected ernel BUG at list_del corruption list_add corruption do_IRQ: stack overflow: ear stack overflow