similar to: indiana as nfs server: crash due to zfs

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 90 matches similar to: "indiana as nfs server: crash due to zfs"

2008 Sep 04
3
Inexistant file displayed by samba
Hello, Running 3.2.0, and in one of my share, a file named TABAFK~V appeared, but is not present on the underlying filesystem. The file can't be removed from a windows client (even a member of domain admins). Not that it is distrubing, but you know... Fran?ois
2008 Jan 14
7
New QEMU 0.9.1 Solaris 10 Packages Available
All, I''ve gone ahead and built the latest QEMU as a package. The package is in the usual spot, at http://www.thoughtwave.com/emulators.html This is the 20080113 CVS head, built for x86 and sparc. Simply install the most recent package, add /opt/thoughtwave/qemu/bin to your path, and the wrapper scripts there will automagically run the right binaries for your architecture. Have fun
2007 Sep 14
9
Possible ZFS Bug - Causes OpenSolaris Crash
I?d like to report the ZFS related crash/bug described below. How do I go about reporting the crash and what additional information is needed? I?m using my own very simple test app that creates numerous directories and files of randomly generated data. I have run the test app on two machines, both 64 bit. OpenSolaris crashes a few minutes after starting my test app. The crash has occurred on
2007 Mar 21
4
HELP!! I can''t mount my zpool!!
Hi all. One of our server had a panic and now can''t mount the zpool anymore! Here is what I get at boot: Mar 21 11:09:17 SERVER142 ^Mpanic[cpu1]/thread=ffffffff90878200: Mar 21 11:09:17 SERVER142 genunix: [ID 603766 kern.notice] assertion failed: ss->ss_start <= start (0x670000b800 <= 0x67 00009000), file: ../../common/fs/zfs/space_map.c, line: 126 Mar 21 11:09:17 SERVER142
2007 Oct 10
6
server-reboot
Hi. Just migrated to zfs on opensolaris. I copied data to the server using rsync and got this message: Oct 10 17:24:04 zetta ^Mpanic[cpu1]/thread=ffffff0007f1bc80: Oct 10 17:24:04 zetta genunix: [ID 683410 kern.notice] BAD TRAP: type=e (#pf Page fault) rp=ffffff0007f1b640 addr=fffffffecd873000 Oct 10 17:24:04 zetta unix: [ID 100000 kern.notice] Oct 10 17:24:04 zetta unix: [ID 839527 kern.notice]
2007 Apr 23
3
ZFS panic caused by an exported zpool??
Apr 23 02:02:21 SERVER144 offline or reservation conflict Apr 23 02:02:21 SERVER144 scsi: [ID 107833 kern.warning] WARNING: /scsi_vhci/disk at g60001fe100118db00009119074440055 (sd82): Apr 23 02:02:21 SERVER144 i/o to invalid geometry Apr 23 02:02:21 SERVER144 scsi: [ID 107833 kern.warning] WARNING: /scsi_vhci/disk at g60001fe100118db00009119074440055 (sd82): Apr 23 02:02:21 SERVER144
2010 Feb 08
5
zfs send/receive : panic and reboot
<copied from opensolaris-dicuss as this probably belongs here.> I kept on trying to migrate my pool with children (see previous threads) and had the (bad) idea to try the -d option on the receive part. The system reboots immediately. Here is the log in /var/adm/messages Feb 8 16:07:09 amber unix: [ID 836849 kern.notice] Feb 8 16:07:09 amber ^Mpanic[cpu1]/thread=ffffff014ba86e40: Feb 8
2007 Nov 16
0
ZFS mirror and sun STK 2540 FC array
Hi all, we have just bought a sun X2200M2 (4GB / 2 opteron 2214 / 2 disks 250GB SATA2, solaris 10 update 4) and a sun STK 2540 FC array (8 disks SAS 146 GB, 1 raid controller). The server is attached to the array with a single 4 Gb Fibre Channel link. I want to make a mirror using ZFS with this array. I have created 2 volumes on the array in RAID0 (stripe of 128 KB) presented to the host
2006 Oct 11
41
ZFS Inexpensive SATA Whitebox
All, So I have started working with Solaris 10 at work a bit (I''m a Linux guy by trade) and I have a dying nfs box at home. So the long and short of it is as follows: I would like to setup a SATAII whitebox that uses ZFS as its filesystem. The box will probably be very lightly used, streaming media to my laptop and workstation would be the bulk of the work. However I do have quite a
2007 Nov 25
2
Corrupted pool
Howdy, We are using ZFS on one of our Solaris 10 servers, and the box paniced this evening with the following stack trace: Nov 24 04:03:35 foo unix: [ID 100000 kern.notice] Nov 24 04:03:35 foo genunix: [ID 802836 kern.notice] fffffe80004a14d0 fffffffffb9b49f3 () Nov 24 04:03:35 foo genunix: [ID 655072 kern.notice] fffffe80004a1550 zfs:space_map_remove+239 () Nov 24 04:03:35 foo genunix: [ID
2007 Aug 26
3
Kernel panic receiving incremental snapshots
Before I open a new case with Sun, I am wondering if anyone has seen this kernel panic before? It happened on an X4500 running Sol10U3 while it was receiving incremental snapshot updates. Thanks. Aug 25 17:01:50 ldasdata6 ^Mpanic[cpu0]/thread=fffffe857d53f7a0: Aug 25 17:01:50 ldasdata6 genunix: [ID 895785 kern.notice] dangling dbufs (dn=fffffe82a3532d10, dbuf=fffffe8b4e338b90) Aug 25 17:01:50
2008 Apr 24
0
panic on zfs scrub on builds 79 & 86
This just started happening to me. It''s a striped non mirrored pool (I know I know). A zfs scrub causes a panic under a minute. I can also trigger a panic by doing tars etc. x86 64-bit kernel ... any ideas? Just to help rule out some things, I changed the motherboard, memory and cpu and it still happens ... I also think it happens on a 32-bit kernel. genunix: [ID 335743 kern.notice] BAD
2007 Sep 19
3
ZFS panic when trying to import pool
I have a raid-z zfs filesystem with 3 disks. The disk was starting have read and write errors. The disks was so bad that I started to have trans_err. The server lock up and the server was reset. Then now when trying to import the pool the system panic. I installed the last Recommend on my Solaris U3 and also install the last Kernel patch (120011-14). But still when trying to do zpool import
2009 Nov 14
0
[indiana-discuss] Boot failure with snv_122 and snv_123
Has this issue been solved yet? I see the same issue when trying to upgrade from 112 to 126. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org
2010 Apr 14
2
brtfs on Solaris? (Re: [osol-discuss] [indiana-discuss] So when are we gonna fork this sucker?)
brtfs could be supported on Opensolaris, too. IMO it could even complement ZFS and spawn some concurrent development between both. ZFS is too high end and works very poorly with less than 2GB while brtfs reportedly works well with 128MB on ARM. Olga On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 5:31 PM, <Casper.Dik at sun.com> wrote: > > >>Just a completely different question...is there any plans
2009 Sep 03
3
building xvm-3.4 gate on indiana
There seems to be no list of needed packages, when starting with a fresh opensolaris dev (b121 today). hg gmake I guessed by now. Additionally the stuff mentioned here: http://opensolaris.org/os/project/indiana/building_on/ But are there further packages needed? Maybe some one should add a verified list to the building howtos... Florian
2006 Mar 14
5
Indiana timezone changing
I have a couple questions... I am in Indiana and our time zone is changing. I used to choose America/Indiana/Indianapolis as the zone and we are changing to Eastern. Question 1) Is there a command line only way to change my timezone? I dont have access to X to run system-config-time. Doing a "system-config-time --help" or "system-config-time -h" did not give any information.
2006 Oct 25
4
Panic while scrubbing
Hello, I am not sure if I am posting in the correct forum, but it seems somewhat zfs related, so I thought I''d share it. While the machine was idle, I started a scrub. Around the time the scrubbing was supposed to be finished, the machine panicked. This might be related to the ''metadata corruption'' that happened earlier to me. Here is the log, any ideas? Oct 24
2006 May 09
3
Possible corruption after disk hiccups...
I''m not sure exactly what happened with my box here, but something caused a hiccup on multiple sata disks... May 9 16:40:33 sol scsi: [ID 107833 kern.warning] WARNING: /pci at 0,0/pci10de,5c at 9/pci-ide at a/ide at 0 (ata6): May 9 16:47:43 sol scsi: [ID 107833 kern.warning] WARNING: /pci at 0,0/pci-ide at 7/ide at 1 (ata3): May 9 16:47:43 sol timeout: abort request, target=0
2010 May 05
3
[indiana-discuss] image-update doesn''t work anymore (bootfs not supported on EFI)
On 5/5/10 1:44 AM, Christian Thalinger wrote: > On Tue, 2010-05-04 at 16:19 -0600, Evan Layton wrote: >> Can you try the following and see if it really thinks it''s an EFI lable? >> # dd if=/dev/dsk/c12t0d0s2 of=x skip=512 bs=1 count=10 >> # cat x >> >> This may help us determine if this is another instance of bug 6860320 > > # dd