similar to: "Cannot copy...The operation completed successfully" / OpenSolaris 2008

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 9000 matches similar to: ""Cannot copy...The operation completed successfully" / OpenSolaris 2008"

2008 May 31
0
OpenSolaris 2008.05 CIFS - "cannot share...smb add share failed"
Hi All, After a LOT of tinkering I eventually determined exactly where I am going wrong. It''s to do with the ZFS ACLs I am applying. Why this is resulting in the behaviour I am seeing, I do not know - perhaps someone can spell it out to me. To cut a long story short, this is how I am creating my file systems:
2008 May 22
0
Weirdly inflated files sizes in Mac OS 10.5.2 Finder / Opensolaris 2008
This is what my collegue is seeing: http://web.mac.com/davekoelmeyer/Dave_Koelmeyer/Dave_Koelmeyer_-_OpenSolaris_2008.05_CIFS_File_Server_OS_10.5.2_Prob_1.html Any experts can help with any leads on this one? This message posted from opensolaris.org
2008 Apr 18
0
Prebuilt OpenSolaris / Nexenta DomU with ZFS root?
Does anyone know of a prebuilt Solaris or Nexenta DomU with a ZFS root that uses paravirtualization? I''ve been mulling over the directions for both, but my Xen DomU is Fedora for the moment. (I hope to use OpenSolaris as my Dom0 at some point, but due to lack of hardware and time, I need to build the VMs first before I format my home-server.) Thanks, -Luke
2010 Jul 02
14
NexentaStor 3.0.3 vs OpenSolaris - Patches more up to date?
I see in NexentaStor''s announcement of Community Edition 3.0.3 they mention some backported patches in this release. Aside from their management features / UI what is the core OS difference if we move to Nexenta from OpenSolaris b134? These DeDup bugs are my main frustration - if a staff member does a rm * in a directory with dedup you can take down the whole storage server - all with
2010 Apr 05
14
Are there (non-Sun/Oracle) vendors selling OpenSolaris/ZFS based NAS Hardware?
I''ve seen the Nexenta and EON webpages, but I''m not looking to build my own. Is there anything out there I can just buy? -Kyle
2008 May 22
5
Configuring svc:/system/xvm/domains?
I''m running Xen on Nexenta Core, and I haven''t yet figured out how to control which DomU''s are started with svcadm enable svc:/system/xvm/domains:default. virsh doesn''t seem to be available with Nexenta Core, so I''d rather edit the configuration files by hand. However, I''ve found neither OpenSolaris or Nexenta documentation on how this is
2008 Aug 25
5
Unable to import zpool since system hang during zfs destroy
Hi all, I have a RAID-Z zpool made up of 4 x SATA drives running on Nexenta 1.0.1 (OpenSolaris b85 kernel). It has on it some ZFS filesystems and few volumes that are shared to various windows boxes over iSCSI. On one particular iSCSI volume, I discovered that I had mistakenly deleted some files from the FAT32 partition that is on it. The files were still in a ZFS snapshot that was made earlier
2010 Aug 28
0
Solaris xattr support (from Mac OS X 10.6)
Hi, I wonder if anyone can confirm if they've been able to successfully transfer xattrs with rsync to a Solaris (based) system (in this case Nexenta Core 3). I managed to get rsync to build with xattr support on Nexenta by using 3.0.10dev, and running rsync --version shows that it's included. However if I try to rsync files from a Mac OS X (10.6) system to the Nexenta system (or vice
2011 Jun 30
1
cross platform (freebsd) zfs pool replication
Hi, I have two servers running: freebsd with a zpool v28 and a nexenta (opensolaris b134) running zpool v26. Replication (with zfs send/receive) from the nexenta box to the freebsd works fine, but I have a problem accessing my replicated volume. When I''m typing and autocomplete with tab key the command cd /remotepool/us (for /remotepool/users) I get a panic. check the panic @
2011 Nov 07
1
Nexenta: "load_mib2nut: using pw mib" package / config / or firewall problem?
G'day I'm currently using NUT on Debian squeeze box in the same subnet with an IBM 3000 HV (branded Eaton 5125 with Web/SNMP card), now I wanted to get our storage appliance running NexentaStor 3.1 set up to be using NUT too. Nexenta- Stor is an OpenSolaris / illumos-based appliance OS currently using NUT packages from ubuntu hardy. My question here is whether I'm running into a -
2009 Aug 17
2
microsoft activex control pad was not completed successfully
hi guys... I'm trying to install control pad (http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms968493.aspx) But I receive this message: microsoft activex control pad was not completed successfully Does anybody knows how to solve that message?? thanks!
2011 Apr 25
3
arcstat updates
Hi ZFSers, I''ve been working on merging the Joyent arcstat enhancements with some of my own and am now to the point where it is time to broaden the requirements gathering. The result is to be merged into the illumos tree. arcstat is a perl script to show the value of ARC kstats as they change over time. This is similar to the ideas behind mpstat, iostat, vmstat, and friends. The current
2009 Aug 16
1
Rsync completed successfully, but files are not identical
Hi All, I came into a strange issue running rsync on directory with ~500,000 files. Some of the file, although with same time stamps and size on source and destination, were different on the destination. The destination is just a mirrored area, and the data written to it, is just the one that comes through rsync. Needless to mentioned, that when I remove files and synced them again it works, or
2010 Aug 18
1
Kernel panic on import / interrupted zfs destroy
I have a box running snv_134 that had a little boo-boo. The problem first started a couple of weeks ago with some corruption on two filesystems in a 11 disk 10tb raidz2 set. I ran a couple of scrubs that revealed a handful of corrupt files on my 2 de-duplicated zfs filesystems. No biggie. I thought that my problems had something to do with de-duplication in 134, so I went about the process of
2010 Aug 04
1
Blktap-control under 2.6.32.16-1.2.108.xendom0.fc13.x86_64
1. Attempt to load Nexenta under 2.6.32.16-1.2.108.xendom0.fc13.x86_64 Xen 4.0.1-rc6-pre & 2.6.32.16-1.2.108.xendom0.fc13.x86_64 on top F13 [root@fedora13 NexentaStor-Community-3.0.2]# uname -a Linux fedora13 2.6.32.16-1.2.108.xendom0.fc13.x86_64 #1 SMP Fri Jul 23 17:09:30 MSD 2010 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux [root@fedora13 NexentaStor-Community-3.0.2]# xm create -c
2012 Jan 10
2
making network configuration sticky in nexenta core/napp-it
Sorry for an off-topic question, but anyone knows how to make network configuration (done with ifconfig/route add) sticky in nexenta core/napp-it? After reboot system reverts to 0.0.0.0 and doesn''t listen to /etc/defaultrouter Thanks.
2024 Jan 17
1
{Device Timeout} The I/O operation specified in %hs was not completed before the timeout period expired
On Wed, 17 Jan 2024 11:23:12 -0300 Elias Pereira <empbilly at gmail.com> wrote: > hi, > > Still dealing with the error. > > In some posts on the internet, a user reported that he has more than > 40k objects in samba and that's why the error occurs. > > When running the command "samba-tool dbcheck --cross-ncs --fix --yes" > reports that it has
2024 Jan 17
1
{Device Timeout} The I/O operation specified in %hs was not completed before the timeout period expired
With --async-op does it run in the background? Is the output saved in a log? On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 12:12?PM Rowland Penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Wed, 17 Jan 2024 11:23:12 -0300 > Elias Pereira <empbilly at gmail.com> wrote: > > > hi, > > > > Still dealing with the error. > > > > In some posts on the internet, a user
2024 Jan 17
1
{Device Timeout} The I/O operation specified in %hs was not completed before the timeout period expired
On Wed, 17 Jan 2024 16:14:48 -0300 Elias Pereira <empbilly at gmail.com> wrote: > With --async-op does it run in the background? Is the output saved in > a log? Just add it to however you ran 'samba-tool drs replicate', I think it will stop the error messages in your logs. Rowland
2024 Jan 17
1
{Device Timeout} The I/O operation specified in %hs was not completed before the timeout period expired
Okay. How do I know if the command really ran correctly? :D On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 4:26?PM Rowland Penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Wed, 17 Jan 2024 16:14:48 -0300 > Elias Pereira <empbilly at gmail.com> wrote: > > > With --async-op does it run in the background? Is the output saved in > > a log? > > Just add it to however you ran