similar to: [Patch net] vsock: improve tap delivery accuracy

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 600 matches similar to: "[Patch net] vsock: improve tap delivery accuracy"

2023 Mar 10
0
[PATCH net-next v3 0/3] vsock: add support for sockmap
On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 07:04:33PM +0000, Bobby Eshleman wrote: > Add support for sockmap to vsock. > > We're testing usage of vsock as a way to redirect guest-local UDS > requests to the host and this patch series greatly improves the > performance of such a setup. > > Compared to copying packets via userspace, this improves throughput by > 121% in basic testing.
2023 Aug 22
0
[PATCH net-next v6 2/4] vsock/virtio: support to send non-linear skb
Hi, I'm sorry for the long delay here. I was OoO in the past few weeks. On Tue, 2023-08-15 at 00:27 +0300, Arseniy Krasnov wrote: > For non-linear skb use its pages from fragment array as buffers in > virtio tx queue. These pages are already pinned by 'get_user_pages()' > during such skb creation. > > Signed-off-by: Arseniy Krasnov <AVKrasnov at sberdevices.ru>
2023 Aug 01
0
[PATCH RFC net-next v5 10/14] virtio/vsock: add VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_DGRAM feature bit
On Tue, Aug 01, 2023 at 04:30:22AM +0000, Bobby Eshleman wrote: >On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 09:48:21AM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 02:38:08PM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >> > On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 12:50:14AM +0000, Bobby Eshleman wrote: >> > > This commit adds a feature bit for virtio vsock to support datagrams. >> > >
2023 Jun 01
0
[PATCH net] virtio/vsock: fix sock refcnt bug on owner set failure
On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 07:47:32PM +0000, Bobby Eshleman wrote: >Previous to setting the owner the socket is found via >vsock_find_connected_socket(), which returns sk after a call to >sock_hold(). > >If setting the owner fails, then sock_put() needs to be called. > >Fixes: f9d2b1e146e0 ("virtio/vsock: fix leaks due to missing skb owner") >Signed-off-by: Bobby
2023 Aug 04
0
[PATCH RFC net-next v5 03/14] af_vsock: support multi-transport datagrams
On Thu, Aug 03, 2023 at 06:58:24PM +0000, Bobby Eshleman wrote: >On Thu, Aug 03, 2023 at 02:42:26PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 03, 2023 at 12:53:22AM +0000, Bobby Eshleman wrote: >> > On Wed, Aug 02, 2023 at 10:24:44PM +0000, Bobby Eshleman wrote: >> > > On Sun, Jul 23, 2023 at 12:53:15AM +0300, Arseniy Krasnov wrote: >> > > >
2023 Feb 16
0
[RFC PATCH v1 05/12] vsock/virtio: non-linear skb support
On Mon, Feb 06, 2023 at 06:58:24AM +0000, Arseniy Krasnov wrote: >Use pages of non-linear skb as buffers in virtio tx queue. > >Signed-off-by: Arseniy Krasnov <AVKrasnov at sberdevices.ru> >--- > net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------ > 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > >diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c
2023 Sep 02
1
[PATCH] virtio-vsock: add VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_DGRAM feature bit
On Sat, Sep 02, 2023 at 04:56:42AM +0000, Bobby Eshleman wrote: > On Fri, Sep 01, 2023 at 02:45:14PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 09:29:45PM +0000, Bobby Eshleman wrote: > > > This adds support for datagrams to the virtio-vsock device. > > > > > > virtio-vsock already supports stream and seqpacket types. The existing > >
2023 Sep 02
1
[PATCH] virtio-vsock: add VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_DGRAM feature bit
On Sat, Sep 02, 2023 at 04:56:42AM +0000, Bobby Eshleman wrote: > On Fri, Sep 01, 2023 at 02:45:14PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 09:29:45PM +0000, Bobby Eshleman wrote: > > > This adds support for datagrams to the virtio-vsock device. > > > > > > virtio-vsock already supports stream and seqpacket types. The existing > >
2020 Apr 21
2
[PATCH net] vsock/virtio: postpone packet delivery to monitoring devices
We delivering packets to monitoring devices, before to check if the virtqueue has enough space. If the virtqueue is full, the transmitting packet is queued up and it will be sent in the next iteration. This causes the same packet to be delivered multiple times to monitoring devices. This patch fixes this issue, postponing the packet delivery to monitoring devices, only when it is properly queued
2020 Apr 21
2
[PATCH net] vsock/virtio: postpone packet delivery to monitoring devices
We delivering packets to monitoring devices, before to check if the virtqueue has enough space. If the virtqueue is full, the transmitting packet is queued up and it will be sent in the next iteration. This causes the same packet to be delivered multiple times to monitoring devices. This patch fixes this issue, postponing the packet delivery to monitoring devices, only when it is properly queued
2023 Sep 06
0
[PATCH] virtio-vsock: add VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_DGRAM feature bit
On Sat, Sep 02, 2023 at 09:24:26AM +0000, Bobby Eshleman wrote: > On Sat, Sep 02, 2023 at 04:41:28AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 02, 2023 at 04:37:19AM +0000, Bobby Eshleman wrote: > > > On Fri, Sep 01, 2023 at 09:31:03AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 12:43:03AM +0000, Bobby Eshleman wrote: > > > >
2023 Sep 02
0
[PATCH] virtio-vsock: add VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_DGRAM feature bit
On Sat, Sep 02, 2023 at 04:37:19AM +0000, Bobby Eshleman wrote: > On Fri, Sep 01, 2023 at 09:31:03AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 12:43:03AM +0000, Bobby Eshleman wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 06:21:35PM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 09:29:45PM +0000, Bobby Eshleman wrote: > > > >
2023 Sep 02
0
[PATCH] virtio-vsock: add VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_DGRAM feature bit
On Sat, Sep 02, 2023 at 04:37:19AM +0000, Bobby Eshleman wrote: > On Fri, Sep 01, 2023 at 09:31:03AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 12:43:03AM +0000, Bobby Eshleman wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 06:21:35PM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 09:29:45PM +0000, Bobby Eshleman wrote: > > > >
2023 May 05
2
[PATCH v4] virtio_net: suppress cpu stall when free_unused_bufs
On Thu, May 4, 2023 at 10:27?AM Wenliang Wang <wangwenliang.1995 at bytedance.com> wrote: > > For multi-queue and large ring-size use case, the following error > occurred when free_unused_bufs: > rcu: INFO: rcu_sched self-detected stall on CPU. > > Fixes: 986a4f4d452d ("virtio_net: multiqueue support") > Signed-off-by: Wenliang Wang <wangwenliang.1995 at
2023 Mar 24
1
[External] Re: [PATCH] virtio_ring: Suppress tx interrupt when napi_tx disable
On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 4:01?PM ?? <huangjie.albert at bytedance.com> wrote: > > Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> ?2023?3?22??? 10:37??? > > > > On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 5:00?PM Albert Huang > > <huangjie.albert at bytedance.com> wrote: > > > > > > From: "huangjie.albert" <huangjie.albert at bytedance.com> > > >
2023 May 10
2
[PATCH] virtio_ring: use u32 for virtio_max_dma_size
On Wed, 10 May 2023 10:54:37 +0800, zhenwei pi <pizhenwei at bytedance.com> wrote: > Both split ring and packed ring use 32bits to describe the length of > a descriptor: see struct vring_desc and struct vring_packed_desc. > This means the max segment size supported by virtio is U32_MAX. > > An example of virtio_max_dma_size in virtio_blk.c: > u32 v, max_size; > >
2023 May 07
1
[PATCH v4] virtio_net: suppress cpu stall when free_unused_bufs
On Fri, May 05, 2023 at 11:28:25AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > On Thu, May 4, 2023 at 10:27?AM Wenliang Wang > <wangwenliang.1995 at bytedance.com> wrote: > > > > For multi-queue and large ring-size use case, the following error > > occurred when free_unused_bufs: > > rcu: INFO: rcu_sched self-detected stall on CPU. > > > > Fixes: 986a4f4d452d
2023 Mar 24
1
[External] Re: [PATCH] virtio_ring: Suppress tx interrupt when napi_tx disable
On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 02:47:02PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 2:42?PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 02:32:40PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 1:59?PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at
2023 May 10
1
[PATCH] virtio_ring: use u32 for virtio_max_dma_size
On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 11:26:54AM +0800, Xuan Zhuo wrote: > On Wed, 10 May 2023 10:54:37 +0800, zhenwei pi <pizhenwei at bytedance.com> wrote: > > Both split ring and packed ring use 32bits to describe the length of > > a descriptor: see struct vring_desc and struct vring_packed_desc. > > This means the max segment size supported by virtio is U32_MAX. > > >
2023 May 10
1
[PATCH] virtio_ring: use u32 for virtio_max_dma_size
On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 11:44?AM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > > On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 11:26:54AM +0800, Xuan Zhuo wrote: > > On Wed, 10 May 2023 10:54:37 +0800, zhenwei pi <pizhenwei at bytedance.com> wrote: > > > Both split ring and packed ring use 32bits to describe the length of > > > a descriptor: see struct vring_desc and struct