similar to: ''zfs list'' output showing incorrect mountpoint after boot -Z

Hi -- I''m getting this error even though I have correct DVD ISO image for snv_92. bash-3.2# uname -a SunOS stoakly2 5.11 snv_92 i86pc i386 i86xpv bash-3.2# xm create snv.py Using config file "./snv.py". Error: (2, ''Invalid kernel'', ''elf_xen_note_check: ERROR: Will only load images built for the generic loader or Linux images'') bash-3.2#

I''m running OpenSolaris 2008.05 in VirtualBox on a Windows XP host. Playing around with various probes, I found that trying to load any probe associated with bdev_strategy dumps core. I can think of one or two likely and reasonable causes for this, but am assuming it''s undesirable behavior. Anyone know what''s happening here? -- This message posted from

Hi all, I''ve just upgraded my OpenSolaris 2008.05 workstation to snv_90 after unsucessfully trying to get virt-install.sh to run on snv_86 and now have (I think) a more serious problem. In the xend-debug.log file I keep getting the following error repeated many times : Failed allocation for dom 8: 1 extents of order 9 ERROR Internal error: Cannot allocate more 2M pages for HVM guest.

Bfu 91 to 92 looks good Proceed with xVM upgrade . After running:- # sunos.hg/bin/build-all nondebug bash-3.2# cd packages-nondebug bash-3.2# pwd /usr/tmp/packages-nondebug bash-3.2# ls -l total 20 drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 512 Jun 21 08:57 SUNWlibvirt drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 512 Jun 21 08:57 SUNWlibvirtr drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 512 Jun 21 08:57 SUNWurlgrabber

I am trying to get a 9550SX to support a 1.5TB raid partition. I am unsure whether this is a driver problem, or an ext3 problem (as am getting some other wierdness detecting LUNs), but... fdisk recognizes the disk OK. I make a single extended partition with a single 1.5TB logical partition inside it. I then run mke2fs -j /dev/sdb It gets to writing inode tables, and wants to write 11176 block

So, I was running my full backup last night, backing up my main data pool zp1, and it seems to have hung. Any suggestions for additional data gathering? -bash-3.2$ zpool status zp1 pool: zp1 state: ONLINE status: The pool is formatted using an older on-disk format. The pool can still be used, but some features are unavailable. action: Upgrade the pool using ''zpool

Hi. Using ZFS-FUSE. $SUBJECT happened 3 out of 5 times while testing, just wanna know if someone has seen such scenario before. Steps: ------------------------------------------------------------ root at localhost:/# uname -a Linux localhost 2.6.24-24-generic #1 SMP Wed Apr 15 15:54:25 UTC 2009 i686 GNU/Linux root at localhost:/# zpool upgrade -v This system is currently running ZFS pool

Let me thank everyone in advance. I''ve read a number of posts here and it helped tremendously in getting the install done. I have a couple of remaining issues which I can''t seem to overcome. Here are the basics: dom0 - CentOS 5.2 32-bit Xen 3.2.1 compiles from source domU - os200805.iso The install config: [root@internetpowagroup oshman]# cat opensolaris.install name =

Hi, I have a zfs root Solaris 10 running on my home server. I created an ISCSI target in the following way: # zfs create -V 1g rpool2/iscsivol Turned on the shareiscsi property # zfs set shareiscsi=on rpool2/iscsivol # zfs list rpool2/iscsivol NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT rpool2/iscsivol 18K 19.9G 18K

Below is an answer by the current weakforced main developer. It overlaps partly with Samis answer. ---snip--- > Do you have any hints/tips/guidelines for things like sizing, both in a > per-server sense (memory, mostly) and in a cluster-sense (logins per sec :: > node ratio)? I'm curious too how large is quite large. Not looking for > details but just a ballpark figure. My

Hi there, I have a client in a network using a samba-server that has to use MSDOS, because some software running on it needs a clean DOS. I installed the DOS-Client for TCPIP that is available from Microsoft V 1.0 and it works fine; the only thing is, that it takes so much memory below 640 K, that another program also running under DOS does not function correctly anymore. Maybe some of the

Hello all, ( I apologize if this posts twice ) Here is my situation. I have 3 buildings linked with 100mbit fiber optics (2 runs that come to the corporate office). I have 3 RH9 boxes, one at each location. Each box at the remote locations have 4 NICs, one for the fiber link, one for LAN, one for the VOIP box and one for the internet connection. The corporate office has 4 NICs also, 1

hi, I have a dataset (the netflix dataset) which is basically ~18k columns and well variable number of rows but let's assume 25 thousand for now. The dataset is very sparse. I was wondering how to do kmeans/nearest neighbors or kernel density estimation on it. I tired using the spMatrix function in "Matrix" package. I think I'm able to create the matrix but as soon as I pass

Hi, I''m trying to configure QoS on my linux in the following manner: I have a main link with 64K, so I divided it in 3 classes of 18K, 14K and 9K with an excess (not used for classified traffic, just to be shared) of 23K. This excess should be distributed proportonally among the 3 classes, that is, the class that has more rate should borrow more bandwidth. What is happening is

Hi List, slightly OT but i have Xen and Windows running (xen 3.2.0, hvm, win 2k3) on top of a lvm volume. Now i want to delete such a volume but i got the message: $ lvremove /dev/Xen0/Win2kServer Can''t remove open logical volume "Win2kServer" The volume is not in use by any VM, but there is a partition table on it with 8Megs of free space and a ntfs partition. I also got 2

Hello, Since I''ve got my disk partitioning sorted out now, I want to move my BE from the old disk to the new disk. I created a new zpool, named RPOOL for distinction with the existing "rpool". I then did lucreate -p RPOOL -n new95 This completed without error, the log is at the bottom of this mail. I have not yet dared to run luactivate. I also have not yet dared set the

Hello, When I upgrade syslinux from 2.13 to 3.02. my linux floppy doesn't boot anymore. steps: dd if=/dev/zero of=fdimg bs=18k count=160 mkdosfs fdimg syslinux fdimg mount -o loop fdimg /mnt cp files/* /mnt/ umount /mnt then use memdisk load fdimg the files includes: vmlinuz initrd syslinux.cfg message.txt f1.txt ... it only prompts 1 line: SYSLINUX 3.02

I'd like to hear the thoughts of list members on which type of storage method seems "best" for inboxes and for folders. The filesystem is GFS2 and for various reasons I can't change it. Inboxes - currently Mbox format. Some users have upwards of 5000 messages in there (the largest is about 18k entries) and thanks to attachments some inboxes are 40-200Mb with a few sitting at

Hi, I apologize for posting this here, I am also trying to post this on machine learning emailing lists. I have a set (18K) of sequences (22 nt long) and I have their counts at 4 different stages. The difference in counts from one stage to the next represents how well the sequence performed in the transition. The total counts remain about the same in each stage. So if a 1 sequence loses some

http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=2334 Summary: zpool destroy panics after zfs_force_umount_stress Classification: Development Product: zfs-crypto Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: Solaris Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P2 Component: other AssignedTo: