similar to: Default Samba version in Debian Bookworm

Hi Peter, Le 28/04/2023 ? 21:17, Peter Milesson via samba a ?crit?: > Hi folks, > > I have tried to get some information about what Samba version will be > the default one when Debian Bookworm gets released, but without luck. > Will it be 4.17, or 4.18? Or even 4.19.x? Will there be Samba backports > for Bookworm? > > I saw a post from Michael Tokarev in this list a

On 30-04-2023 10:06, Peter Milesson via samba wrote: > > > On 29.04.2023 10:35, Yvan Masson via samba wrote: >> Hi Peter, >> >> Le 28/04/2023 ? 21:17, Peter Milesson via samba a ?crit?: >>> Hi folks, >>> >>> I have tried to get some information about what Samba version will >>> be the default one when Debian Bookworm gets released,

On 29.04.2023 10:35, Yvan Masson via samba wrote: > Hi Peter, > > Le 28/04/2023 ? 21:17, Peter Milesson via samba a ?crit?: >> Hi folks, >> >> I have tried to get some information about what Samba version will be >> the default one when Debian Bookworm gets released, but without luck. >> Will it be 4.17, or 4.18? Or even 4.19.x? Will there be Samba

30.04.2023 11:20, Rowland Penny via samba ?????: .. > There is a big problem with this, bookworm hasn't been released yet and as far as I can see, there isn't a bookworm-backports yet. > The only mention of Samba 4.18 that I can see in Debian is in experimental, a long way from any backports. No, there's no long way to bookworm-backports. I use experimental just because debian

On 30/04/2023 09:06, Peter Milesson via samba wrote: > Hi Yvan, > > Thanks for the information, really useful. Essentially, it means I need > to wait for the official release of Debian Bookworm, and then getting > the newest Samba packages from Bookworm backports. It's just a little > over a month away, so there is ample time for planning upgrades. > > Best

Replying here as well, since this is a frequent question. I uploaded the updated samba packages to the official debian archives in parallel with updating my repository - exactly the same source packages as are used to build samba for my repository. 4.18 should already be available on sid/unstable, I think. In trixie/testing it will migrate within 5 days if nothing other breaks. Updated bookworm

On Fri, 7 Feb 2025 17:05:59 +0000 Stephen Brandli via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > HI, > > Really appreciate you guys! > > Three questions: > > First, I am installing new DCs using Bookworm's stable install. That would get you Samba 4.17.12, but using bookworm-backports will get you 4.21.3 ( the latest version ). > The > current DCs are

On 30-04-2023 10:46, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > > On 30/04/2023 09:37, Peter Milesson via samba wrote: >> >> >> On 30.04.2023 10:20, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 30/04/2023 09:06, Peter Milesson via samba wrote: >>>> Hi Yvan, >>>> >>>> Thanks for the information, really useful.

On 30/04/2023 09:37, Peter Milesson via samba wrote: > > > On 30.04.2023 10:20, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: >> >> >> On 30/04/2023 09:06, Peter Milesson via samba wrote: >>> Hi Yvan, >>> >>> Thanks for the information, really useful. Essentially, it means I >>> need to wait for the official release of Debian Bookworm, and then

On 30.04.2023 10:51, Kees van Vloten via samba wrote: > > On 30-04-2023 10:46, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: >> >> >> On 30/04/2023 09:37, Peter Milesson via samba wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 30.04.2023 10:20, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> On 30/04/2023 09:06, Peter Milesson via samba wrote:

On 06/06/2023 10:51, Lorenzo Milesi via samba wrote: > >> As I understand it, you only need Michael's repo for Ubuntu, The Debian >> backport repo gets updated with the same Samba packages as his repo (or >> is it the other way around ?). He is the Debian Samba maintainer. > > With the repos you can select several minor versions (from 4.16 to .18), while backports

On 30.04.2023 10:20, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > > On 30/04/2023 09:06, Peter Milesson via samba wrote: >> Hi Yvan, >> >> Thanks for the information, really useful. Essentially, it means I >> need to wait for the official release of Debian Bookworm, and then >> getting the newest Samba packages from Bookworm backports. It's just >> a

On 30-04-2023 12:04, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > > On 30/04/2023 10:52, Peter Milesson via samba wrote: >> >> >> On 30.04.2023 10:51, Kees van Vloten via samba wrote: >>> >>> On 30-04-2023 10:46, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> On 30/04/2023 09:37, Peter Milesson via samba wrote:

On 30/04/2023 10:52, Peter Milesson via samba wrote: > > > On 30.04.2023 10:51, Kees van Vloten via samba wrote: >> >> On 30-04-2023 10:46, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 30/04/2023 09:37, Peter Milesson via samba wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> On 30.04.2023 10:20, Rowland Penny via samba wrote:

HI, Really appreciate you guys! Three questions: First, I am installing new DCs using Bookworm's stable install. The current DCs are running Bullseye (again using i's latest). I don't think upgrading a DC directly will be easy if I have to do it. (They run in containers on a Buster host.) Is it feasible/advisable to upgrade by installing a couple of new DCs, joining them to the

18.08.2023 10:47, spindles seven via samba ?????: > On August 16, 2023 spindles seven wrote: >> roy at franks:~$ sudo apt -t bookworm-backports install samba winbind >> Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Reading state information... >> Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have >> requested an impossible situation

Am 04.07.2024 um 21:00 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > On Thu, 4 Jul 2024 20:27:37 +0200 > Paul Leiber via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Dear Samba list, >> >> I have a Samba instance running as an ad-dc on debian bullseye. > > I suggest you upgrade, bullseye goes EOL in three weeks. Aww, my system is already on bookworm, not on bullseye.

Roland, Thank you for your answers. To be clear, everything will be Bookworm when I'm done. My question about upgrading a new DC rather than upgrading old ones is the "Upgrade a DC and join it to the domain again" process here: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Upgrading_a_Samba_AD_DC, right? You said it "raises the RID pools." I don't know what that means. But,

On Thu, 4 Jul 2024 20:27:37 +0200 Paul Leiber via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Dear Samba list, > > I have a Samba instance running as an ad-dc on debian bullseye. I suggest you upgrade, bullseye goes EOL in three weeks. > Some > time ago, I changed the standard installation to backports with > > apt -t bullseye-backports install samba I normally

Op 18-10-2023 om 11:32 schreef Ingo Asche via samba: > Hi Michael, > > thanks for the info - and your work... > > As Bookworm for Raspberry isn't that far away, I can live with that. > This is "just" my playground... I have recently migrated my Raspberry Pi machines from Raspbian to Debian bookworm. It has several advantages: - All Debian packages are