similar to: Android browsing fails

I have an Android client (x-plore) that was able to see and mount shares from my server until the latest upgrade. I've tried setting client ipc min protocol = NT1, but it still can't browse to the server and can't connect to shares if I supply the address.Is there some browsing/sharing setting that I might have missed in the most recent version? This is Debian bullseye samba

I have been testing a Debian 11 (i386) server with samba 2:4.13.13+dfsg-1~deb11u5 running as an Active Directory Controller. This is a stand-alone DC, meant for user authentication for a small business network. I use RSAT Features on Windows 11 Pro to manage Users, Groups, Machines etc., which works fine. I would like create a new GPO using the RSAT Group Policy Manager to change Security

On 3/10/23 8:56 AM, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > > On 10/03/2023 15:46, David Mulder via samba wrote: >> On 3/10/23 8:35 AM, Dennis Binkhorst via samba wrote: >>> I have been testing a Debian 11 (i386) server with samba >>> 2:4.13.13+dfsg-1~deb11u5 running as an Active Directory Controller. >>> This is >>> a stand-alone DC, meant for user

Thanks Rowland. I really appreciate your rapid responses and many years of work helping the python community. To answer your question, I could wrap samba tool -- but I thought it would be easier -- and more pythonic to keep the code pure python. As for what chatgpt knows... for the curious I'll paste the relevant responses below. Chat did suggest making calls to the samba-tool. I thought

On Thu, 2023-05-11 at 23:50 +0200, Olivier MARTIN via samba wrote: > Hello, > > I was hoping to reprovision the same domain by specifying the domain > GUID in the command line tool 'samba-tool domain provision' but I am > not > sure if I missed something or if there is a bug but the specified > domain > GUID is not the one which is created for my domain. >

On 07/04/2023 20:20, David Bear via samba wrote: > I am looking for the python-samba module. I would like to > add/disable/modify AD accounts using python running on a linux machine. > ChatGPT suggested the python-samba module. Sample code as follows: > > from samba.credentials import Credentials > from samba.netcmd.user import create as create_user > from samba.netcmd.user

On 10/03/2023 15:58, David Mulder via samba wrote: > > On 3/10/23 8:56 AM, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: >> >> >> On 10/03/2023 15:46, David Mulder via samba wrote: >>> On 3/10/23 8:35 AM, Dennis Binkhorst via samba wrote: >>>> I have been testing a Debian 11 (i386) server with samba >>>> 2:4.13.13+dfsg-1~deb11u5 running as an Active

13.07.2023 19:17, Adi Kriegisch wrote: > Hi! > >> I was looking at the code this morning trying to figure out how to >> reject packet with lvl2 properly, - unfortunately I don't know samba >> well enough to be able to find the place "quickly" and I got distracted >> by other things. It was my first thought when someone posted the debug >> info

I have several devices, mostly amd64 and armhf architectures, all of which updated samba to 4.17.6 without any problems. But one which is armel architecture failed to update; instead I get the following when I try to update: root at goflex:~# samba -V Version 4.17.5-Debian root at goflex:~# apt update Hit:1 http://ftp.uk.debian.org/debian bullseye InRelease Get:2 http://ftp.uk.debian.org/debian

Hi there. I don't know if this happens only to me but I am trying to install GlusterFS Latest using apt from https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/LATEST/Debian/ but it's not working. I get stuck with I/O error like this: Do you want to continue? [Y/n] Get:1 https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/10/LATEST/Debian/bullseye/amd64/apt bullseye/main amd64

Hi! On 10/19/21 5:44 AM, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote: > On 5/10/2021 1:33 PM, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote: >> [...] with buster and bullseye running as the Dom0, I can only get the VGA/Passthrough feature to work with Windows Xen HVMs. I would expect both Windows and Linux HVMs to work comparably well. You don't mention the used Xen version (Debian package version) for buster and bullseye

On 5/10/2021 1:33 PM, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote: > Package: src:linux > Version: 5.10.28-1 > Severity: normal > Tags: upstream > > Dear Maintainer, > > I have been using Xen's PCI and VGA passthrough feature since wheezy and jessie were the stable versions, and back then both Windows HVMs and Linux HVMs would function with the Intel Integrated Graphics Device (IGD), the

o22.02.2023 20:35, Marco Shmerykowsky PE via samba ?????: > Makes sense.? However, the question started about doing > upgrades & not new installs.? It was advised to get to Bullseye > (which will essentially take samba backwards in version) and then upgrade using the backports. Once again, this is unnecessary and this is not what will happen if you just upgrade your distribution to

10.04.2023 21:38, Elias Pereira via samba ?????: > Hi, > > Any ETA for the inclusion of 4.18.x in bullseye-security? There will be no 4.18.x on bullseye or bullseye-backports. Maybe bullseye-backports-sloppy but very unlikely too. /mjt

Previously, I needed to downgrade Louis samba packages to Buster's defaults, which would then be upgraded to 4.13 by the dist-upgrade to Bullseye. This was on a Domain Member, so didn't touch my DC's or have to worry about DB format stepping (I hope). apt install samba=2:4.9.5+dfsg-5+deb10u3 python-samba samba-common=2:4.9.5+dfsg-5+deb10u3 samba-common-bin=2:4.9.5+dfsg-5+deb10u3

Hi Johannes, Thank you for your comments. I run sudo apt install -t bullseye-cran40 r-base and have now the current R-4.0.0 in /usr/lib/R with links in the menus and R-devel R-4.1.0 in ~/patrice/svn/R/r-devel/build. Perfect. I used sid just to get the full Texlive 2020. I will probably not update it for a while and have already removed (commented) the sid line in sources.list as I do not

Dear all, I whish to relate my installation of R-4.0.0 on Debian. I am mainly a Windows user and occasionnaly verify the CRAN checks of my packages on a second laptop equipped with Linux Mint Debian Edition 3 (LMDE3) based on Debian Stretch. On Friday, April 24, it took me a few hours to have R-4.0.0 installed on Windows and the sources compiled, thanks to the instructions provided by

On 15/02/2023 21:02, Marco Shmerykowsky wrote: > > On 2023-02-15 2:13 pm, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: >> On 15/02/2023 19:05, Marco Shmerykowsky via samba wrote: >>> I ran an 'apt-get update' and a 'apt-get upgrade' >>> samba with the packages referencing Van Belle >>> site for debian bister samba 415. >>> >>> After

On 13 March 2023 15:19 Dr. Nicola Mingotti wrote: > Hi, > > Just an idea, > > i was moving samba in the last days, i put in my note that i did: > --- > $> sudo apt install -t bullseye-backports winbind > --- > > So maybe, if you installed the stable winbind and the backported samba there are issues. > > You might try to remove winbind and reinstall it from

On 16 March 2023 20:22 Michael Tokarev wrote: > 14.03.2023 13:02, spindles seven via samba wrote: > This is one of many examples why I thought it is not a good idea to have the same > version of samba packages for bullseye on my repository as on testing/unstable. > But people insisted :) > > The thing is: both my bullseye 4.17 repository and debian unstable now has version >