similar to: Android Clients Unable to Browse/Connect to Shares

I have an Android client (x-plore) that was able to see and mount shares from my server until the latest Debian upgrade. I've tried setting client ipc min protocol = NT1, but it still can't browse to the server and can't connect to shares if I supply the address.Is there some browsing/sharing setting that I might have missed in the most recent version? This is Debian bullseye

I have been testing a Debian 11 (i386) server with samba 2:4.13.13+dfsg-1~deb11u5 running as an Active Directory Controller. This is a stand-alone DC, meant for user authentication for a small business network. I use RSAT Features on Windows 11 Pro to manage Users, Groups, Machines etc., which works fine. I would like create a new GPO using the RSAT Group Policy Manager to change Security

On 3/10/23 8:56 AM, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > > On 10/03/2023 15:46, David Mulder via samba wrote: >> On 3/10/23 8:35 AM, Dennis Binkhorst via samba wrote: >>> I have been testing a Debian 11 (i386) server with samba >>> 2:4.13.13+dfsg-1~deb11u5 running as an Active Directory Controller. >>> This is >>> a stand-alone DC, meant for user

On Thu, 2023-05-11 at 23:50 +0200, Olivier MARTIN via samba wrote: > Hello, > > I was hoping to reprovision the same domain by specifying the domain > GUID in the command line tool 'samba-tool domain provision' but I am > not > sure if I missed something or if there is a bug but the specified > domain > GUID is not the one which is created for my domain. >

Thanks Rowland. I really appreciate your rapid responses and many years of work helping the python community. To answer your question, I could wrap samba tool -- but I thought it would be easier -- and more pythonic to keep the code pure python. As for what chatgpt knows... for the curious I'll paste the relevant responses below. Chat did suggest making calls to the samba-tool. I thought

On 10/03/2023 15:58, David Mulder via samba wrote: > > On 3/10/23 8:56 AM, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: >> >> >> On 10/03/2023 15:46, David Mulder via samba wrote: >>> On 3/10/23 8:35 AM, Dennis Binkhorst via samba wrote: >>>> I have been testing a Debian 11 (i386) server with samba >>>> 2:4.13.13+dfsg-1~deb11u5 running as an Active

13.07.2023 19:17, Adi Kriegisch wrote: > Hi! > >> I was looking at the code this morning trying to figure out how to >> reject packet with lvl2 properly, - unfortunately I don't know samba >> well enough to be able to find the place "quickly" and I got distracted >> by other things. It was my first thought when someone posted the debug >> info

On 07/04/2023 20:20, David Bear via samba wrote: > I am looking for the python-samba module. I would like to > add/disable/modify AD accounts using python running on a linux machine. > ChatGPT suggested the python-samba module. Sample code as follows: > > from samba.credentials import Credentials > from samba.netcmd.user import create as create_user > from samba.netcmd.user

Thanks Andrew for your reply. Actually, I started to dive into the code just before your answer to try to analyze and potentially fix the issue. But after stepping back I actually realized I was looking at the wrong LDAP entry! My initial intention was to set the domain controller's GUID to a known GUID to avoid to regenerate certificates when I recreate my Samba AD DC environment - such

I'm using winbind to authenticate telnet session under Red Hat Enterprise 2.1 samba/winbind version 2.2.10 Domains are NT4 domains I have everything set up and configured correctly. Local users and users from trusted domains are able to log-in. I'm having a problem with the resulting username when a user logs on from a trusted domain. Local domain is phonic Trusted domain is thisted

Hello, just checking into the amazing world famous 4k web-framework mailing list esquire! -El -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/camping-list/attachments/20060715/f1f487ee/attachment.html

Re-sending with right email... msdfs root is set to "no" by default and is per-share. [myshare] msdfs root = no path = ... Should do the trick. Otherwise if mounting on linux you can also use the 'nodfs' mount option (mount.cifs //host/share/... /mnt/ -o ...,nodfs) to disable DFS resolving and automatic sub-mounting. Chad W Seys <cwseys at

I am a relative R newbie and I am having trouble with reshape() on R V1.9.1 on Linux. The same code appears to be ok when run on R V2.2.0 on Windows and a V2.1 on Linux. Any help would be great as I need to stay on V1.9 for the immediate future... Thanks, Reid Hutchins df <- data.frame(state= rep(1:2, each=8), school=rep(1:2,each=4), class=rep(1:2,each=2),Values2Columns=rep(1:2,

Hi all, now that I have solved drivers problem on shared printers I've found a new problem regarding variable substitution on shared printers "print command"... in smb.conf on the print command parameter section I read: > %J - the job name as transmitted by the client. but the print command receive the ip address with dots replaced with underscore :? In effect in smb.conf

Dear R-devel, A while ago Prof. Ripley had mentioned that g77 on AMD64 isn't the greatest, and the Salford Fortran is likely to be better. My question is, has anyone tried compiling R with Salford compilers (or other commercial compilers)? If so, do they offer performance advantages over GCC? TIA for any info. Best, Andy Andy Liaw, PhD Biometrics Research PO Box 2000, RY33-300

Hi Aurélien, is there some documentation around where I can read about that? Where can I find the information, that I need Kernel 4.11 or above to get DFS with SMB2.0 / 2.1 / 3.0 and above working? Regards, Christian Am 12.06.2017 um 12:46 schrieb Aurélien Aptel: > Hi Christian, > > Christian Garling via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> writes: >> a few days ago we

Hi everyone, I'm having the following situation: I need to migrate all SMB file services to a new appliance that only supports the SMB2+ protocol. Unfortunately, there are still some very old Linux clients ("modinfo cifs" says version 1.60) that do only speak SMB1 and need to access these shares after the migration. Is it possible to have a Linux with a modern Samba

Hello, >> Can more than one server have a share with 'msdfs root = yes'? Or >> can there be only one root? (Setting 'msdfs root = yes' on shares on > > yes Thanks! It works great for all clients* except the linux kernel (v4.9) mount, which was what led me astray. Any idea if this works in more recent kernels? If not where do I wish list this. :)

On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 1:33 PM, Dale Schroeder < dale at briannassaladdressing.com> wrote: > > > Try the "vers=3.0" option. That's what fixed mine. > > I suspect my old version of cifs-utils doesn't understand that option. Note the output says "vers=3.0,ver=1": mount.cifs --verbose //192.168.254.35/projects /mnt/smb -o

Hello everyone, I am working with a database shared with samba and sometimes the client and server enter in a loop where the client try to obtain a lock to a file and the server respond with "STATUS_LOCK_NOT_GRANTED". This situation can last until one of them crash. I think in the past lock spin count prevent this from happening. In nowadays samba version is there an option that