similar to: [Bug 1672] New: bug egress hook virtio interface with VLAN

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1673 Bug ID: 1673 Summary: bug egress hook virtio interface with VLAN Product: nftables Version: 1.0.x Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: kernel Assignee: pablo at netfilter.org

Hi! The Netfilter project proudly presents: nftables 0.6 This release contains many accumulated bug fixes and new features availale up to the Linux 4.7-rc1 kernel release. New features ============ * Rule replacement: You can replace any rule from the unique 64-bits handle. You have to retrieve the handle from the ruleset listing. # nft list ruleset -a table ip filter { chain

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1261 Bug ID: 1261 Summary: nft trace crash with msg "BUG: invalid verdict value 2" Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: nft

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1399 Bug ID: 1399 Summary: tables/chains priority doesn't work Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: kernel Assignee: pablo at

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1169 Bug ID: 1169 Summary: Bug in altering IP TTL field of a packet? Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: nft Assignee: pablo at netfilter.org

The netfilter project presents: nftables 0.2 This release contains a rather large number of bug fixes, syntax cleanups, new features, support for all new features contained in the recent 3.14 kernel release as well as *drumroll* documentation. Syntax changes ============== * More consistency in data type names Data type names are used in set declarations. All address related types now

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1742 Bug ID: 1742 Summary: using nfqueue breaks SCTP connection (tracking) Product: libnetfilter_queue Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: libnetfilter_queue Assignee:

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1092 Bug ID: 1092 Summary: nft v0.6 segfault in must_print_eq_op at expression.c:520 during 'nft monitor trace' in netdev filter Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: All Status: NEW

Hello, What''s difference between ingress and egress shaping? When we need to setup ingress shaping(policing) ? Bye

Hi all, Supposedly my router is itself streaming traffic to clients. Is it possible for it to mark its packets before going through dsmark?? I have gone through the examples in iproute2/examples, i noticed that there''s always an ingress and egress of which these are 2 different dev. Is it possible for before ingress and egress be the same dev?? I tried the script below but

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I''ve just discovered that trying to pass traffic from multiple interfaces through the same imq is a Bad Thing(tm). A quick search of "HTB IMQ panic" showed me older posts on this list saying that it''s simply incorrect to pass such traffic through the same imq dev. I''m now back to square one on using the linux

Hi, Can Ingress and Egress can be used in Asterisk, so that Jitter can be calculated...! Regards -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20130821/12427233/attachment.htm>

I''m trying to set up customer egress shaping on concentrator that customers connect to using pptp (which uses pppd). This means customers each have a pppXXX interface when they connect. It''s easy to shape their "down" speed this way, and when they disconnect the interface is gone and thus the shaping rules automatically go away as well. However, shaping their upload

i''m trying to limit my egress bandwidth over 2 interfaces (eth1 and eth2) to 2 Mbit my script is something like this: tc=/sbin/ip ipt=/sbin/iptables $tc class add dev imq0 parent 2: classid 2:4 htb rate 1845Kbit quantum 3000 $tc filter add dev imq0 parent 2: protocol ip handle 4 fw classid 2:4 $tc class add dev imq0 parent 2:4 classid 2:40 htb rate 0.5Mbit quantum 3000 prio 5 $tc qdisc

I am successfully running ingress (IMQ) and egress (HTB) shaping on a bridge. Is there any way to combine and share the bandwidth between ingress and egress? Example: I have set up www service for egress at 128 KB and ingress at 256 KB. The shaping on them works fine separately. However, I want to create a single virtual pipe for www traffic and limit both ingress and egress combined to 256 KB.

Hi, Does anybody know how to get the SIP call ID of a "Dial" command? Thanks in advance. Ray -- Want an e-mail address like mine? Get a free e-mail account today at www.mail.com! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20071008/7f27548e/attachment.htm

Hey all, I've been fighting with this all morning, and I feel like this should be a relatively simple task, but I just can't get it to work. I currently have a very basic asterisk v11.6 setup with a single extension (a Bria softphone) and a single sip trunk to my carrier. What I'm trying to accomplish is simply adding the asterisk generated SIPCALLID of the leg between asterisk and

I have two interfaces, eth0 and eth1 but i can''t discern the egress traffic than ingress traffic. I need to apply htb qdisc in both directions, and I read that I need the IMQ patch to do this, because in ingress qdisc i can''t apply htb qdisc...but where is the ingress qdisc? affect the traffic that goes from eth0 to eth1 or is for the traffic that goes from eth1 to eth0?

Hi, I've looked around the archives and have spent a while on voip-info.org but not found an answer so forgive me if this is in a FAQ somewhere. We've got several Asterisk servers with E1 cards (some Digium, some Sangoma). We provide non geographic numbers for customers and route calls to their existing phone numbers. Calls come in over the PSTN and into Asterisk. This works perfectly

Hi, I have a Debian based NAT router. How can I manage upstream egress bandwidth based on the LAN ipadress in the network below? My goal is that host1 get a minumum of 10Mbit up/down and host2 gets a minimum of 90Mbit up/down, both max 100Mbit up/down? targethost 172.16.255.254 | | 172.16.0.1 natrouter