similar to: 4.18.x on bullseye-security update?

10.04.2023 21:38, Elias Pereira via samba ?????: > Hi, > > Any ETA for the inclusion of 4.18.x in bullseye-security? There will be no 4.18.x on bullseye or bullseye-backports. Maybe bullseye-backports-sloppy but very unlikely too. /mjt

Experimental on the samba or debian side? The samba wiki says that 4.18.1 is the stable release. Latest Releases > Current Stable Release: 4.18.1 (Release Notes) > Maintenance Mode: 4.17.7 (Release Notes) > Security Fixes Only Mode: 4.16.10 (Release Notes) > Release Planning On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 4:16?PM Rowland Penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >

On 30-04-2023 10:06, Peter Milesson via samba wrote: > > > On 29.04.2023 10:35, Yvan Masson via samba wrote: >> Hi Peter, >> >> Le 28/04/2023 ? 21:17, Peter Milesson via samba a ?crit?: >>> Hi folks, >>> >>> I have tried to get some information about what Samba version will >>> be the default one when Debian Bookworm gets released,

On 29.04.2023 10:35, Yvan Masson via samba wrote: > Hi Peter, > > Le 28/04/2023 ? 21:17, Peter Milesson via samba a ?crit?: >> Hi folks, >> >> I have tried to get some information about what Samba version will be >> the default one when Debian Bookworm gets released, but without luck. >> Will it be 4.17, or 4.18? Or even 4.19.x? Will there be Samba

Hi Peter, Le 28/04/2023 ? 21:17, Peter Milesson via samba a ?crit?: > Hi folks, > > I have tried to get some information about what Samba version will be > the default one when Debian Bookworm gets released, but without luck. > Will it be 4.17, or 4.18? Or even 4.19.x? Will there be Samba backports > for Bookworm? > > I saw a post from Michael Tokarev in this list a

Hi folks, I have tried to get some information about what Samba version will be the default one when Debian Bookworm gets released, but without luck. Will it be 4.17, or 4.18? Or even 4.19.x? Will there be Samba backports for Bookworm? I saw a post from Michael Tokarev in this list a while ago, that there probably wont be a Samba 4.18 for Debian Bullseye. I also saw another post about

Hey Luke, thanks for the help!!! It's working now!!! God bless you and your family!! :D Remember that GPOs need to run as the context of either the computer or the > user. Computers typically do not have access to many folders on a file > server, even as "Everyone". That is why the NETLOGON folder works. > > If you're deploying as a USER configuration, then it

Which GPO? Computer or User Configuration? Remember that GPOs need to run as the context of either the computer or the user. Computers typically do not have access to many folders on a file server, even as "Everyone". That is why the NETLOGON folder works. If you're deploying as a USER configuration, then it should run as the context of the user, meaning the Everyone permission

Replying here as well, since this is a frequent question. I uploaded the updated samba packages to the official debian archives in parallel with updating my repository - exactly the same source packages as are used to build samba for my repository. 4.18 should already be available on sid/unstable, I think. In trixie/testing it will migrate within 5 days if nothing other breaks. Updated bookworm

Hi Elias, > I thought it worked, but after I uninstalled the software that I deployed > via user scope, it did not reinstall. I selected the "Redeploy application" > option, but it also did not work. The user scope GPO are run with the privileges and access tokens of the logged on user, so the user have local admin rights for install and need access rights to the share you

Hello list, I tried to set up a folder on our fileserver domain member, so I can deploy software for users' machines, but is not working. If I put the software inside "netlogon" it installs correctly. \\172.16.1.7\storage\programs Auth Users - read & execute, list folder contents, read and write Do I need other permissions? -- Elias Pereira

hello guys, In my tests lab did the migration ldap base of the old samba3 to Samba4 ADCD. It's possible to migrate directories and files from users of the old samba3 to Samba4 ADDC? -- Elias Pereira

While this should work, neither is this particularly harmful. ?Links to objects that don't exist are ignored at runtime. Andrew Bartlett On Tue, 2023-04-04 at 14:39 -0300, Elias Pereira via samba wrote: > hi, > > Any clue? > > On Mon, Apr 3, 2023 at 10:17?AM Elias Pereira <empbilly at gmail.com> wrote: > > > hi, > > > > I have this DC in aws to

Hi Johannes, Thank you for your comments. I run sudo apt install -t bullseye-cran40 r-base and have now the current R-4.0.0 in /usr/lib/R with links in the menus and R-devel R-4.1.0 in ~/patrice/svn/R/r-devel/build. Perfect. I used sid just to get the full Texlive 2020. I will probably not update it for a while and have already removed (commented) the sid line in sources.list as I do not

On 22/12/14 17:47, Elias Pereira wrote: > And now, I run the command "samba-tool user list" and the result is as > follows: > > *# samba-tool user list* > *ldb_wrap open of secrets.ldb* > *Could not find machine account in secrets database: Failed to fetch > machine account password from secrets.ldb: Could not find entry to match > filter:

The saga continues... I've spent a whole day with log level 5 and 7 and no error. All I have to do is return the log to the default and the error reappears. I monitored the "LDAP Query: Duration", but I didn't notice any crashes in the queries. I don't know if it's a long time, but some queries took 1.5s. Is there anything else I can do? On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at

Found it! :) I thought in make a script more or less that way. #!/bin/bash # GROUP=ADM GUID=10000 # Domain Users UID=10000 # get the next ID ? for USER in $(samba-tool group listmembers $GROUP) do samba-tool user edit $USER -H ldap://samdom.example.com \ -U administrato --nis-domain=samdom \ --unix-home=/home/$USER \ --uid-number=${NEXTID} \

1.5 seconds is pretty long, I would look into what those queries are. I would also look into repeated queries, sometimes these things are clients stuck in a loop where they don't complete because they expect some termination condition. Andrew Bartlett On Tue, 2024-04-02 at 09:25 -0300, Elias Pereira via samba wrote: > The saga continues... > I've spent a whole day with log level 5

> > Simple answer: > Administrator, No > Domain Admins, Yes Ok. It was already that way. root at fileserver:/etc/samba# getent group ... domain admins:x:10004: domain users:x:10000: dap:x:10003: dti:x:10001: For some reason with the administrator user is not working, I put my user as domain admin and include him as a member of unix and now I can access the security tab.

Hi Rowland, Could you tell me what the correct permissions are for the bind9 files? On Wed, Jan 3, 2024 at 5:46?PM Elias Pereira <empbilly at gmail.com> wrote: > The only 'problem' I can see is that the group is set to 'bind' instead >> of 'root', why is this ? > > If I'm not mistaken, I did it on the wiki, but maybe I needed an older >