similar to: zfs status -v tries too hard?

Does anyone have any experience getting LIRC 0.9.0 up and running on CentOS 6.6? I have the packages from EPEL installed: lirc.x86_64 0.9.0-8.el6 @epel lirc-doc.x86_64 0.9.0-8.el6 @epel lirc-libs.x86_64 0.9.0-8.el6 @epel lirc-remotes.x86_64 0.9.0-8.el6 @epel And my IR

Hi friends, I need to generate a list, that should contain the quantile value of one column in a data frame. while I am compiling this one i am facing one bug,, Really I cannot find out that where the problem has occurred? Could any one help me to come out from this bug?? Here is the code, data <- lapply(comb.data$zFE, function(x) aggregate(x,

Hey, I have a portable harddisk Western Digital 120GB USB. Im running Nevada b42a on Thinkpad T43. Is this a supported configuration for setting up ZFS on portable disks ? Found out some old blogs about this topic: http://blogs.sun.com/roller/page/artem?entry=zfs_on_the_go and some other info under: http://www.sun.com/io_technologies/USB-Faq.html Is this information still valid ? Under ZFS FAQ

I want to list/use the nfs probes but I get the error "dtrace: failed to match nfs*:::: No probe matches description". Is there a way to enable nfs provider probes? My system is running snv_112 (bfu''ed from the gate archive) # dtrace -lP nfs* ID PROVIDER MODULE FUNCTION NAME dtrace: failed to match nfs*:::: No probe matches

I have great luck running rsync from one linux system to another, or from a windows system (with cwRsync) to a linux system. But when I try to do an rsync backup from one directory on a Windows system to another, it fails. The cwRsync says its version is 2.6.9. Here's my Rsync command, boiled down to its simplest: rsync -rlptgD -vvv --delete --delete-excluded --modify-window=2

Hi guys, I have a quick question, I am playing around with ZFS and here''s what I did. I created a storage pool with several drives. I unplugged 3 out of 5 drives from the array, currently: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM gpool UNAVAIL 0 0 0 insufficient replicas raidz1 UNAVAIL 0 0 0 insufficient replicas c8t2d0 UNAVAIL 0 0

Hi all It seems Mercurial doesn't work with "write behind" on. Any ideas? With write-behind -- root at dj1:~/mnt# gluster volume set conf performance.write-behind on Set volume successful root at dj1:~/mnt# hg clone http://projects.unbit.it/hg/uwsgi destination directory: uwsgi requesting all changes adding changesets transaction abort! rollback completed abort: integrity check

Kirtland Air Force Base has denied approval for the use of R on its Windows network. Some of their objections seem a bit strange, but some appear to be legitimate. In particular, they have detected registry "vulnerabilities" which are detailed in the attachment. I know nothing about Windows registry vulnerabilities. If any of these issues are legitimate concerns,

Using MultiValueSorter, I can sort by key1, key2, relevance; or relevance, key1, key2. But AFAIK, I can't sort by key1, relevance, key2. Unless I spool out the entire result set or write some C++. I wonder if we need a new 'sort by' function that accepts any combination of keys and relevance in any order? The function would make it's own optimisations (ie is relevance first or

What''s going on? # dtrace -s iotime_all.d 100 dtrace: failed to enable ''iotime_all.d'': DIF program content is invalid The errant script.... #pragma D option quiet BEGIN { stime = timestamp; io_count = 0; } io:::start /args[2]->fi_pathname != "<none>"/ { start[pid, args[2]->fi_pathname, args[0]->b_edev, args[0]->b_blkno,

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47 ------- Additional Comments From kaber@trash.net 2003-05-14 02:39 ------- I've captured some non-fragmented tcp packets which show this behaviour with 2.4.21-rc2. They look badly damaged. The destination ip doesn't match the mac but they come from valid connections. Setting interface mtu to 1486 helps which makes me

[Initial version of this message originally sent to zfs-interest by mistake. Sorry if this appears anywhere as a duplicate.] I was noodling around with creating a backup script for my home system, and I ran into a problem that I''m having a little trouble diagnosing. Has anyone seen anything like this or have any debug advice? I did a "zfs create -r" to set a snapshot on all

Hello, all I''m "playing" with ZDB again on another test system, the rpool being uncompressed with 512-byte sectors. Here''s some output that puzzles me (questions follow): # zdb -dddddddd -bbbbbb rpool/ROOT/nightly-2012-01-31 260050 ... 1e80000 L0 DVA[0]=<0:200972e00:20200> DVA[1]=<0:391820a00:200> [L0 ZFS plain file] fletcher4 uncompressed

Gene Cumm wrote: > >> My test x86-64 binaries: > >> > >> https://sites.google.com/site/genecsyslinux/sl604p0g17-x64.tgz?attredirects=0&d=1 > > On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 4:46 PM, Derrick M <derrick.martinez at gmail.com> wrote: > > This works! Fixes my issue I have been having with the DL160s > > Further testing, preferably of the above binaries,

Yesterday morning I awoke to alerts from my SAN that one of my OS disks was faulty, FMA said it was in hardware failure. By the time I got to work (1.5 hours after the email) ALL of my pools were in a degraded state, and "tank" my primary pool had kicked in two hot spares because it was so discombobulated. ------------------- EMAIL ------------------- List of faulty resources:

Dear developer, This issue may be not related to openssh but I am not sure. So post it here for some luck. The issue is like this:(you can see more formatted description at (https://serverfault.com/questions/878504/can-only-ssh-unidirectional) I have two centos 7.2 server. One machine ip is 10.104.196.18, another machine is 10.240.197.21. I can successfully ssh from 10.104.196.18 to

Hi, I have three squeeze servers running: ii linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64 2.6.32-38 Linux 2.6.32 for 64-bit PCs, Xen dom0 support ii xen-hypervisor-4.0-amd64 4.0.1-4 The Xen Hypervisor on AMD64 All three servers have Intel gigabit NICs, but one server uses the e1000e driver and the other two use the igb driver. They've been in production for around 6 months now

Hi, I have three Debian squeeze servers running: ii linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64 2.6.32-38 Linux 2.6.32 for 64-bit PCs, Xen dom0 support ii xen-hypervisor-4.0-amd64 4.0.1-4 The Xen Hypervisor on AMD64 All three servers have Intel gigabit NICs, but one server uses the e1000e driver and the other two use the igb driver. They''ve been in production for around 6

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1097 Bug ID: 1097 Summary: TARPIT function does not work in ip6tables Product: netfilter/iptables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: Ubuntu Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: ip6_tables (kernel) Assignee:

Please run 'gluster v get all cluster.max-op-version' and what ever value it throws up should be used to bump up the cluster.op-version (gluster v set all cluster.op-version <value>) . With that if you restart the rejected peer I believe the problem should go away, if it doesn't I'd need to investigate further once you can pass down the glusterd and cmd_history log files and