similar to: (no subject)

Dear All, Thank you for your help (especially Rowland Penny), I finally managed to migrate our ancient ext3 based, ISO-8859-2 encoded SaMBa 3.2.5 with locally stored UIDs and GIDs to a UTF-8 encoded ex4 based server running SaMBa 4.16.4 with RID UID/GID backend. However, after two weeks of the migration I observed something horrible: Windows Word (or MS Office in general) somehow manages to

Anyone looked into almalinux? I was sort of waiting for rocky, but I see from over the weekend on slashdot that almalinux stable is released. mark

> I can't predict the future but my feeling is that AlmaLinux has a good > chance to become the second Gold standard. I disagree with you. Both Rocky Linux and AlmaLinux are in a very comfortable position, and they will likely stay that way. my predict is that they will continue as a #rebuilder / #freeloader, writing software is a hard work. SuSe hardfork will probably be only an

Thank you. While I'm currently in the process of migrating to AlmaLinux 8 via an in-place upgrade, I initially wanted to update the base packages on CentOS 7 before proceeding. However, given the circumstances, it seems deploying a separate AlmaLinux machine for testing might be the most efficient approach to troubleshooting the issue. If the problem persists on a fresh AlmaLinux

On 3/28/23 08:59, GitLab wrote: > GitLab > ? Pipeline #819889104 has failed! > > ? > Project nbdkit <https://gitlab.com/nbdkit> / libnbd > <https://gitlab.com/nbdkit/libnbd> > Branch > master <https://gitlab.com/nbdkit/libnbd/-/commits/master> > > Commit > 2db30279 >

Hi, I've quickly made an incomplete list of the RHEL and clones/forks landscape to see what the current situation is. The interesting question will be how this will change in the coming years and how it affects Red Hat/IBM and the Linux users in general. RHEL ("The Original", quasi Gold standard until June 2023) CentOS Stream (rolling RHEL next) Oracle Linux (almost 1:1 rebuild

On 2024-06-20 13:13, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Thu, 20 Jun 2024 12:59:58 +0200 > Olaf Fr?czyk via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> I use uids from this range for many, many years, since samba 3. :) > Which unfortunately was a bad idea, using Samba IDs that start at > '1000' means that you cannot have ANY local users. What happens if you >

Pipeline #819889104 has failed! Project: libnbd ( https://gitlab.com/nbdkit/libnbd ) Branch: master ( https://gitlab.com/nbdkit/libnbd/-/commits/master ) Commit: 2db30279 ( https://gitlab.com/nbdkit/libnbd/-/commit/2db30279bad4f9923baa541008f5da11624d2d1f ) Commit Message: socket activation: set LISTEN_FDNAMES Add LIST... Commit Author: Laszlo Ersek ( https://gitlab.com/lersek ) Pipeline

> > On 2022-11-08 15:49, Orion Poplawski wrote: > > On 11/8/22 13:12, Simon Matter wrote: > > Is anyone else experiencing trouble with > kernel-3.10.0-1160.80.1.el7.x86_64? > > I'm seeing a kernel panics in the kvm module on one of our VM hosts with > > it. > > I did notice a new libvirt

It works for us with Rocky Linux 8.8 and Samba 4.17.5. DCs are Samba 4.18.2. Looking at your conf I see this: I do _not_ have this: idmap config DOMAIN:unix_primary_group = yes I have and you don't: disable netbios = yes smb ports = 445 server min protocol = SMB2 client min protocol = SMB2 Different: kerberos method = secrets and keytab And this is deprecated: winbind nss info =

On Thu, 20 Jun 2024 13:49:41 +0200 Olaf Fr?czyk via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > On 2024-06-20 13:13, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > On Thu, 20 Jun 2024 12:59:58 +0200 > > Olaf Fr?czyk via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > >> I use uids from this range for many, many years, since samba 3. :) > > Which unfortunately

Looking. Rocky was supposed to release something at the beginning of the month, but I haven't seen anything. -Frank -----Original Message----- From: CentOS [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of mark Sent: Monday, April 5, 2021 11:21 AM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: [CentOS] almalinux? Anyone looked into almalinux? I was sort of waiting for rocky, but I see from over the

Dear Rowland, I'm trying to write a single email answering all the question of your recent emails: > Hi Tamas, I have been reviewing you numerous posts on this list about > this project, are you aware that you have been posting for 6 months ? Well, not exactly :-) Only 5 months and 5 days :-) However, this specific thread is only 9 days old. I had a few mails in january, february,

Am 2016-02-24 um 13:32 schrieb Rowland penny: > I would add a few extra lines: > > dedicated keytab file = /etc/krb5.keytab > kerberos method = secrets and keytab > winbind refresh tickets = Yes > idmap config CUST:schema_mode = rfc2307 > > The first three should ensure the tickets never expire and the last one > defines the schema that idmap will use. I

Hello, ?? I am a fairly experienced user.? I have set up tftp in the past at various times, although it's been a few years. I am using version... Version????? : 5.2 Release????? : 37.el9 On AlmaLinux 9.3, I currently have SELinux disabled. ]# firewall-cmd --list-services cockpit dhcp dhcpv6-client http ssh tftp I have tftp enabled on the firewall.? ( I have tried with the firewall completely

Hello; We were able to set up shared folders in a cluster (using dovecot as proxy on dedicated front-end servers, without using director) by following https://doc.dovecot.org/configuration_manual/shared_mailboxes/cluster_setup/. Here is our related conf on imap farms (dovecot v2.3.16 on Almalinux): namespaces: mail_location = maildir:~/Maildir namespace default { ? inbox = yes ? location

Will I really HAVE to use the idmap backends AD or RID? I was planning to use TDB2 with a script which I've already written: [root at fs3 samba]# ./idmap.sh IDTOSID UID 1301 SID:S-1-5-21-1632654815-303659134-1628659390-1950 [root at fs3 samba]# ./idmap.sh IDTOSID GID 198 SID:S-1-5-21-1632654815-303659134-1628659390-3247 [root at fs3 samba]# ./idmap.sh SIDTOID

On 16/06/2023 16:20, Tam?s N?meth via samba wrote: > Dear Rowland, > > I'm trying to write a single email answering all the question of your > recent emails: > > >> Hi Tamas, I have been reviewing you numerous posts on this list about >> this project, are you aware that you have been posting for 6 months ? > > Well, not exactly :-) Only 5 months and 5

I noticed that rsync can preserve most of the file's characteristics when it is used with "-a" option (it includes -o and -g flags for preserving owners and groups). However, when I transfer data between systems, it affects my UIDs/GIDs, making the data hard to recover. Example: Sending side: /etc/passwd: mark:x:503:503::/home/mark:/bin/bash file: -rw-rw-r-- 1 mark mark

On 15/06/2023 16:18, Tam?s N?meth via samba wrote: Hi Tamas, I have been reviewing you numerous posts on this list about this project, are you aware that you have been posting for 6 months ? In your last post there was this: [quote] this "piling up" of ACL information doesn't happen either on a native Windows file server or with vfs_acl_xattr [/quote] Does this mean you do not