similar to: Virtiofsd

On Tue, Apr 04, 2023 at 17:12:15 +0100, Simon Fairweather wrote: > Hi > > In QEMU 8 virtiofsd has been removed in favor of the rust version. Which > includes options that are not longer supported, > > > Do you have a view on what should be used going forwards to support > virtiofsd in libvirt with qemu 8? > > The options are showing as depreciated, > -o

If you like running QEMU as a normal user (very common for TCG runs) but you have to run virtiofsd as a root user you run into connection problems. Adding support for an optional --socket-group allows the users to keep using the command line. Signed-off-by: Alex Benn?e <alex.bennee at linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha at redhat.com> --- v1 - tweak documentation and

On 08/02/2023 11:43, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > On Wed, Feb 08, 2023 at 09:33:33AM +0100, Peter-Jan Gootzen wrote: >> >> >> On 07/02/2023 22:57, Vivek Goyal wrote: >>> On Tue, Feb 07, 2023 at 04:32:02PM -0500, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: >>>> On Tue, Feb 07, 2023 at 02:53:58PM -0500, Vivek Goyal wrote: >>>>> On Tue, Feb 07, 2023 at 02:45:39PM

Hi, This is an initial implementation of a vhost-user backend for the VirtIO RPMB device. The device is currently in the draft of the next VirtIO specification and describes block device which uses combination of a key, nonce, hashing and a persistent write counter to prevent replay attacks (hence Replay Protected Memory Block). It is implemented as a vhost-user device because we want to

Urgh? I modified the FreeBSD kernel to allow all_xx_fd() calls on O_PATH descriptors and that seems make vfs_zfsacl to work fine. Not 100% tested but I could atleast view and modify the ACL on some stuff from a Windows client via Samba that way. I?m not sure I?ll be able to get them to implement this ?officially? though. Reading ACLs via an O_PATH-opened descriptor seems to be on the way of

Hello, We are having performance problems trying to migrate our pop/imap servers to a new version. Our old servers are 4 debian lenny with 5GB of RAM running of XenServer VMs with kernel 2.6.32-4-amd64 and dovecot 1.1.16. New servers are 4 ubuntu 12.04 with dovecot 2.1.5 running on vmware vm with 6 cores and 16GB of RAM and kernel 3.2.0-24-generic. On both server we are using nfs 3 with

On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 09:57:37AM +0200, Peter Eriksson via samba wrote: >I?ve been looking at an issue when compiling Samba on FreeBSD 13 with the vfs_zfsacl module. > >It seems the logic that detect O_PATH support in Samba doesn?t work right with FreeBSD 13 (since it has implemented O_PATH support) and especially with the acl_get_fd() function. This is a bug (or rather a missing

I?ve been looking at an issue when compiling Samba on FreeBSD 13 with the vfs_zfsacl module. It seems the logic that detect O_PATH support in Samba doesn?t work right with FreeBSD 13 (since it has implemented O_PATH support) and especially with the acl_get_fd() function. This is a bug (or rather a missing feature) in FreeBSD that there is a patch for now (dunno when it?ll appear in a release

All, This is a heads up only for users exporting OCFS2 volumes as NFS mounts. If not, please disregard this email. Recently there was a bugzilla filed that mentioned observing file system lockups when accessing OCFS2 exported volumes with FreeBSD NFS clients. The lockups were not observed by him with Linux NFS clients. http://oss.oracle.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=977 Analysis showed that the

All, This is a heads up only for users exporting OCFS2 volumes as NFS mounts. If not, please disregard this email. Recently there was a bugzilla filed that mentioned observing file system lockups when accessing OCFS2 exported volumes with FreeBSD NFS clients. The lockups were not observed by him with Linux NFS clients. http://oss.oracle.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=977 Analysis showed that the

On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 10:14:11AM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 5:54 PM Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha at redhat.com> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 05:12:02PM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > > > I've folded the series from Vivek and fixed a couple of TODO comments > > > myself. AFAICS two issues remain that need to be

On 11/08/2013 09:12 AM, Steve Capper wrote: > diff --git a/usr/klibc/lstat.c b/usr/klibc/lstat.c > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..0282eec > --- /dev/null > +++ b/usr/klibc/lstat.c > @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ > +#include <fcntl.h> > +#include <unistd.h> > +#include <sys/types.h> > +#include <sys/stat.h> > +#include <sys/syscall.h> > +

On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 05:12:02PM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > I've folded the series from Vivek and fixed a couple of TODO comments > myself. AFAICS two issues remain that need to be resolved in the short > term, one way or the other: freeze/restore and full virtqueue. I have researched freeze/restore and come to the conclusion that it needs to be a future feature. It will

This is needed as the basis for the readlink -f option. Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben at decadent.org.uk> --- v2: Don't implement the BSD/GNU extension of allowing a non-existent last part. Use open(O_PATH) and procfs to get resolved name from the kernel. --- a/usr/include/stdlib.h +++ b/usr/include/stdlib.h @@ -92,4 +92,6 @@ static __inline__ int grantpt(int __fd) return

Commit-ID: 3fefc6a404a970a911417d0345618a7e9abfef70 Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/?p=libs/klibc/klibc.git;a=commit;h=3fefc6a404a970a911417d0345618a7e9abfef70 Author: Ben Hutchings <ben at decadent.org.uk> AuthorDate: Wed, 6 Jan 2016 00:43:25 +0000 Committer: H. Peter Anvin <hpa at linux.intel.com> CommitDate: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 17:45:36 -0800 [klibc] MIPS: Update archfcntl.h

Release Announcements --------------------- This is the latest stable release of the Samba 4.14 release series. Changes since 4.14.7 -------------------- o? Jeremy Allison <jra at samba.org> ?? * BUG 14742: Python ldb.msg_diff() memory handling failure. ?? * BUG 14805: OpenDir() loses the correct errno return. ?? * BUG 14809: Shares with variable substitutions cause core dump upon

Release Announcements --------------------- This is the latest stable release of the Samba 4.14 release series. Changes since 4.14.7 -------------------- o? Jeremy Allison <jra at samba.org> ?? * BUG 14742: Python ldb.msg_diff() memory handling failure. ?? * BUG 14805: OpenDir() loses the correct errno return. ?? * BUG 14809: Shares with variable substitutions cause core dump upon

Hello, I have an interesting architecture consisting of a 3 RHEL 5.3 NFS nodes that mounts about 30 TB worth of iscsi disk and presents them as 6 different NFS shares. It is an active-active-active cluster with each node presenting a couple of shares. It works pretty well. I am doubting my decision to use NFS and am wondering if CIFS would be a better route. Here are the NFS stats: getattr

I found this from ocfs1.4 document: g) NFS OCFS2 volumes can be exported as NFS volumes. This support is limited to NFS version 3, which translates to Linux kernel version 2.4 or later. Users must mount the NFS volumes on the clients using the nordirplus mount option. This disables the READDIRPLUS RPC call to workaround a bug in NFSD, detailed in the following link:

Hallo, we are using samba V.3.0.2a on Linux 2.4.18 Previous Versions of samba showed the same effect. The linux-box has mounted nfs-shares from solaris SunOS 5.8 This nfs-connection is a WAN-connection, that has limited bandwidth(some Megabit/second). When connection is slow, then it happened often that saving a file to this share is disturbed. Sometime it simply hangs, sometime an error