similar to: PSARC/2006/289 Rationalized IFF_NOFAILOVER for IPMP Singleton

I want to bond together both interfaces on my dom0 using IPMP to provide a redundant path. Is this supported? - I''ve done a google and found no specific mention of doing exactly this so I''d like to know if it is possible before I attempt it. Many thanks, Matt. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org

We have had an interesting issue with Market Data and Network Interface failures in the past with ipmp (or even VCS multinicA).. Multicast groups can not span multiple interfaces and in our environment when we have a network failure the interface is failed over however the multicast group does not. The only way to recreate the multicast group is to restart the application with the active network

(depends on Advance Storage Configuration patch) This patch adds the option of requesting, at install time, that swap LVs be encrypted. The modifications include: * Introduction of the ovirt_swap_encrypt install parameter * Inclusion of all required packages * Inclusion of required kernel modules * Introduction of /etc/ovirt-crypttab to hold encrypted swap configuration (Couldn't use

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1014 Summary: SCP slow bandwidth with Solaris8 on n240 Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 3.7.1p2 Platform: ix86 OS/Version: SunOS Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: scp AssignedTo: openssh-bugs at mindrot.org ReportedBy:

We''re currently designing a ZFS fileserver environment with iSCSI based storage (for failover, cost, ease of expansion, and so on). As part of this we would like to use multipathing for extra reliability, and I am not sure how we want to configure it. Our iSCSI backend only supports multiple sessions per target, not multiple connections per session (and my understanding is that the

An action handler (select_person_by_name) in my controller class assigns into session, and then does a redirect_to. I get the error "TypeError (singleton can''t be dumped):" followed by a stack trace that doesn''t cross my code. Google tells me this is ordinarily caused by assigning a singleton instance into session, but what I''m assigning is an ordinary String.

Hi all, I found this thread in the August backgroundrb-devel archives. >This means that in order to reference the new_worker method *in the >instance that is running in the drb server* you can''t do that >directly. In order to spawn other workers from within a worker I >would have to change the MiddleMan class to be a singleton. This way >you could grab the one instance of

I wrote a plugin [1] a while ago that lets me do validations on a single AR instance. Instead of defining validations in an AR class, I can define them on a AR instance''s singleton class: class << @video validates_presence_of :title end One of my specs mocks Video.find, and the above code is run on the mock object. When I run the spec, I get the expected undefined method

Hello, after having changed the session store from CGI::Session::DRbStore to CGI::Session::ActiveRecordStore, I keep getting an error which says: singleton can''t be dumped However, my session object is not a singleton. Does anybody know what causes this error? I can also post the full stack trace, if required. Greetings Michael Kastner

Hi, I am doing an integration with commission junction using SOAP to get the result. It is working fine for me. My problem is I have to add the pagination so I have used will_paginate for pagination. For each page I am doing a call to commission junction and getting the result which make a performance bottleneck for my application. To solve this I have decided to store the response in session and

Hello all. I''m writing my own object using prototype and I wonder how you write and call only one instance of class. Can anyone share his idea of singleton? thanks Gregor ---------------------------------------------------- Gdy nadchodzi przełomowy moment w historii, musisz zdecydować, po czyjej stronie będziesz. "X-Men: Ostatni bastion" - w kinach od 26 maja.

All, I want to create a mock action to test a filter in a functional test, e.g.: # Simplified example def test_my_filter # Singleton action def @controller.foo assert # something end ActionController::Routing::Routes.draw do |map| map.connect '':controller/foo'', :action => ''foo'' end get :foo end My log files show that

Hi all how can I implement the singleton patter in RoR? thanks -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this

Hi all, I know it may not have much sense thinking about a Singleton Pattern in an R application which doesn't use any OOP facilities, however I'm curious to know if anybody faced the same issue. I've been googling but using "singleton pattern" as a key word leads to typical OOP languages like Java or C++ among others. So my problem is that I'd like to ensure some very

On Oct 8, 2009, at 9:19 AM, Kenneth Uildriks wrote: > Right now, on X86, creating multiple ExecutionEngines in the same > process causes an assertion. > Yes. This is by design. > If it's supposed to always be a singleton, should there be a way to > get the process's ExecutionEngine instance? > I can't see why. You could make a server to process llvm code. >

Right now, on X86, creating multiple ExecutionEngines in the same process causes an assertion. If it's supposed to always be a singleton, should there be a way to get the process's ExecutionEngine instance? This would, among other things, allow "lli" to execute bitcode that itself uses the ExecutionEngine.

If an Rd file has only one keyword entry then the Splus sgm file made with Rdconv --type=SSgm has no keyword entries. To reproduce: Use prompt() to make a skeleton help file R> f<-function(x)log(1+x)-log1p(x) R> prompt(f) Created file named 'f.Rd'. Edit the file and move it to the appropriate directory. R> q() It has 2 \keyword entries in it

Hello, My first PDF report from rails. When i try to render "tab.render_on(pdf)", I get that error message. Thanks any help, Helder ================================================================= TypeError in ContasController#plano singleton can''t be dumped RAILS_ROOT: script/../config/.. Application Trace | Framework Trace | Full Trace

We have a fairly expensive task that we''d rather not schedule too many instances of in parallel. Couldn''t get pool_size to limit the amount of workers, and I figure that''s hardly optimal anyway, so would like to have the work queued up for a single named worker instead, running as soon as possible. Using MiddleMan.schedule_worker() with :job_key does start off a

In eager compilation mode, I don't know of anything that would go wrong with having multiple JITs in the process. However, in lazy compilation mode, we need to map stub addresses to the JIT that knows how to compile them. Right now, that's done by looking up the static "TheJITResolver" variable and assuming it's the only JIT, but we could 1) use a static