similar to: 4775289 fsck reports wrong state in superblock if there once has existed a largefile

Author: jkennedy Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: 6a727a093fbd6794a7ca69a71d9fa81f29c9364b Log message: 6251659 statvfs taking 30 second to complete performance regression s9 to s10 oracle 9ir2 starcat ufs Files: update: usr/src/uts/common/fs/ufs/ufs_alloc.c update: usr/src/uts/common/fs/ufs/ufs_inode.c update: usr/src/uts/common/fs/ufs/ufs_thread.c update:

Hello, currently we're using version 1.0.13 with 32bit file offsets. Is it safe to switch to a new version with largefile support enabled ? We want to reuse existing index/cache or do we have to expect errors with that ? Regards. Martin --------------------------------------------------------------- Martin Preen, Universit?t Freiburg, Institut f?r Informatik Georges-Koehler-Allee 52, Raum

Author: eschrock Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: e5f70a6fc5010aa205f244a25a9cdb950e0dae89 Log message: 6366222 zdb(1M) needs to use largefile primitives when reading label 6366267 zfs broke non-BUILD64 compilation of libsec Files: update: usr/src/cmd/zdb/zdb.c update: usr/src/lib/libsec/Makefile

Full_Name: John Brzustowski Version: R-devel-trunk, R-2.4.0 OS: linux Submission from: (NULL) (206.248.132.197) DESCRIPTION seek() on files larger than 2 gigabytes fails for large values of "where" on i386 linux 2.6.13 (and presumably other 32-bit unix-like platforms). e.g.: > f<-file("3gigabytefile.dat", "rb") > seek(f, 3e9, "start",

Hi All I just installed a 2 node ,10 r2 rac on centos Linux 4.6 My rac install was done by following Jeff Hunters document (excellent work!) http://www.idevelopment.info/ For storage I used openfiler with the iscsi protocol http://www.openfiler.com/ everything went perfect... to the letter, I gracefully shutdown the 2 nodes , then the openfiler appliance, when I went to start it back up,

Greetings one and all; I'm not subscribed to this list so I'm first sending this message to verify that mails from me make it through, and then later I'll send the juicy messages with patches. Also, the address I'm using is IPv6-only and doesn't often work, so drop me from any replies and I'll catch the archives, or drop only the hostname part to get an IPv4 address that

Author: jkennedy Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: c6deb796730059e475204de40509f1a0b63d0eb3 Log message: 6246748 monitor goes into power management if left at dtlogin screen with cgsix card Files: update: usr/src/uts/sun/io/cgsix.c

Hi, I am still bit of a novice to SAMBA. However, I feel that I have it up and running well except for the following error: [2000/02/03 22:32:48, 0] nmbd/nmbd_incomingdgrams.c:(703) process_get_backup_list_request: Invalid name type 0 - should be 0x1b or 0x1d. Has any one seen this error before? What does it mean and how might it be fixed? Thanks for your help in advance!! John

Author: jkennedy Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: 63308426792db821ec9cbcee19b97511cc9b7362 Log message: 6345556 get_db_rec needs to use correct ioctl for MN sets Files: update: usr/src/lib/lvm/libmeta/common/meta_metad_subr.c

Author: jkennedy Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: ac044a111b99c396d47fb7ef9474fef1cc9a9bc4 Log message: 6189103 Incorrect timeout values for systems with mixed frequency cpus Files: update: usr/src/uts/sun4/os/x_call.c

i posted on rhel list about proper creating of 6tb ext3 filesystem and tuning here.......http://www.redhat.com/archives/nahant-list/2006-November/msg00239.html i am reading lots of ext3 links like...... http://www.redhat.com/support/wpapers/redhat/ext3/ http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2005-September/052533.html http://batleth.sapienti-sat.org/projects/FAQs/ext3-faq.html ............but

Greetings. Total newbie with Ext3. I selected when I upgraded my system to RH7.2. I upgraded my system again to RH8.0. Here is some info: [root@world root]# cat /proc/mounts rootfs / rootfs rw 0 0 /dev/root / ext3 rw 0 0 /proc /proc proc rw 0 0 usbdevfs /proc/bus/usb usbdevfs rw 0 0 none /dev/shm tmpfs rw 0 0 none /dev/pts devpts rw 0 0 /dev/hdd1 /mnt/genericdata1 ext2 rw 0 0 Ok, so

Hi, I have a problem with errors=panic on ext3. When a panic occurs, the error event is not recorded anywhere. So after the reboot, e2fsck doesn't kick in, the file system gets mounted again and the box panics again... Patch below moves the ERRORS_PANIC test down a bit so the journal is aborted before panic() is called. Eric Signed-off-by: Eric Lammerts <eric at lammerts.org> ---

hello. had a bad day yesterday: accidentally, the first 0.5% to 1% of my ext3 partition got overwritten, can't gauge it more exactly. Geography of the partition is: size ~100 GB. block size should be 4096. => deleted are averages to 500mb - 1gb still. I don't think it is relevant, but the device itself is /dev/loop0, because there is a cryptoloop layer between the device and the

Hello, I'd like to read superblock's information on Redhat 7.3, but I don't know how to do it. For example, Input : "/dev/sdj2" Output : ext2_super_block struct's s_wtime (I saw it at "/usr/include/ext2fs/ext2_fs.h") Input : "/dev/sdj1" Output : ext3_super_block struct's s_wtime (I saw it at

Hello, i have a little problem. Our server has an broken RAID. # cat /proc/mdstat Personalities : [raid1] md0 : active raid1 sda1[2](F) sdb1[1] 2096064 blocks [2/1] [_U] md2 : active raid1 sda3[2](F) sdb3[1] 1462516672 blocks [2/1] [_U] md1 : active raid1 sda2[0] sdb2[1] 524224 blocks [2/2] [UU] unused devices: <none> I have remove the partition: # mdadm --remove

Hello, ? when the free Inode-List in the superblock is empty, there? will be a function how updates the inode-list with free inodes. On whoch location does the kernel prove thes requirement? The requirement is: Free Inode-List=Empty!I checked the linux source but i can?t find the function which checks if the superblock free inode list is empty! ? Thanks for your help and sorry for my bad english

Author: prabahar Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: 027bdeb71f1847a9969d352a2d0be3ff968b35a9 Log message: 4913439 clri doesn''t first check for ufs superblock magic number before taking action Files: update: usr/src/cmd/fs.d/ufs/clri/clri.c

hi,sir I creat the filesystem with command mkfs.btrfs /dev/sda2, and it returns fs created label (null) on /dev/sda2 nodesize 4096 leafsize 4096 sectorsize 4096 size 2.93GB then I mount the /dev/sda2 with command mount -t btrfs /dev/sda2 /btrfs/, it returns mount: /dev/sda2: can''t read superblock. Why? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe

Last time I asked here about superblocks (which we were using in the first version of ThreadSanitizer instrumentation) Tobias Grosser has suggested to use RegionInfo: did you have a look at the RegionInfo pass? It currently detects some kind of refinded SESE regions. I use them in Polly and as far as I know the Intel OpenCL SDK also uses them in some way. It is not SEME, but it may