similar to: ntlm_auth and freeradius

Op 03-04-2023 om 16:05 schreef Tim ODriscoll via samba: > Dear All, > > I'm trying to setup FreeRADIUS to authenticate a machine account to grant access to wifi for domain-connected machines. I think I've got the GPO's set up properly and the CA deployed to the clients, as I'm not getting any errors there. > > The errors I'm getting are to do with ntlm_auth not

Op 03-04-2023 om 16:05 schreef Tim ODriscoll via samba: > Dear All, > > I'm trying to setup FreeRADIUS to authenticate a machine account to grant access to wifi for domain-connected machines. I think I've got the GPO's set up properly and the CA deployed to the clients, as I'm not getting any errors there. > > The errors I'm getting are to do with ntlm_auth not

On Mon, 2023-04-03 at 15:08 +0000, Tim ODriscoll via samba wrote: > Unfortunately it's still erroring out: > (7) mschap: Creating challenge hash with username: host/SL-6S4BBS3.MYDOMAIN.co.uk > (7) mschap: Client is using MS-CHAPv2 Is this set as a UPN (with the realm appended) on the user? -- Andrew Bartlett (he/him) https://samba.org/~abartlet/ Samba Team Member (since 2001)

On Mon, 2023-04-03 at 15:08 +0000, Tim ODriscoll via samba wrote: Unfortunately it's still erroring out: (7) mschap: Creating challenge hash with username: host/SL-6S4BBS3.MYDOMAIN.co.uk (7) mschap: Client is using MS-CHAPv2 > Is this set as a UPN (with the realm appended) on the user? I don't see any UPN's in my AD record, only SPNs - unless I misunderstand you? I've run

> I guess we have to look at the conf files then, first these two: Thank you for the config file snippets. I can confirm mine were almost identical, so I've tweaked them so that they are now exactly the same as yours except for the "--require-membership-of=example\authorization_groupname" line in ntlm_auth. Unfortunately it's still erroring out: (7) mschap: Creating

On Tue, 2023-04-04 at 07:55 +0000, Tim ODriscoll wrote: > On Mon, 2023-04-03 at 15:08 +0000, Tim ODriscoll via samba wrote: > > > > > > Unfortunately it's still erroring out: > > (7) mschap: Creating challenge hash with username: host/SL- > > 6S4BBS3.MYDOMAIN.co.uk > > (7) mschap: Client is using MS-CHAPv2 > > > > > Is this set as a

On Tue, 2023-04-04 at 09:37 +0200, Kees van Vloten wrote: > Op 04-04-2023 om 00:32 schreef Andrew Bartlett: > > > > > On Mon, 2023-04-03 at 15:08 +0000, Tim ODriscoll via samba wrote: > > > > > Unfortunately it's still erroring out: > > > (7) mschap: Creating challenge hash with username: host/SL-6S4BBS3.MYDOMAIN.co.uk > > > (7) mschap:

> You said earlier that you have set ntlm auth = mschapv2-and-ntlmv2-only Yes, I found that here: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Authenticating_Freeradius_against_Active_Directory > This means to reject NTLMv1, which MSCHAPv2 is cryptographically, unless the client makes special pleading that it used MSCHAPv2 with it's client. > This is related to the missing ntlm_auth option

Hai, It does not happen often but yes, i also need some help as i cant know everything also and im new with freeradius. Im working on a configuration for samba member + freeradius with ntlm_auth. Why ntlm_auth, because the next one is kerberos and ldap auth to configure.. I want to have some fallback options here and you have to start somewhere. This is running on my new proxy/gateway

Hello Alexander, thanks Alexander for these configuration snippets. Which version of Samba are you using? Is this on debian bullseye? Is the FreeRADIUS server installed on a DC or on a Domain Member? (I just tested the latter). is "ntlm auth = yes" OK for the DCs and the domain member or does it have to be "mschapv2-and-ntlmv2-only" for all servers (DCs + Member)? It

I can share my notes, we authenticate UniFi clients via Freeradius against Samba AD. We also check group membership which you might or might not need: ## 4 FreeRADIUS ### 4.1 Basics ```bash apt install freeradius freeradius-ldap freeradius-utils # create new DH-params openssl dhparam -out /etc/freeradius/3.0/certs/dh 2048 ``` ### 4.2 Configure Authentication - modify mschap to use winbind,

Hi Matthias, we?re using Debian Bullseye with the backports repo. So version is a mixture of - Samba version 4.17.3-Debian - Samba version 4.17.7-Debian We?ve installed it directly on the DC?s as well. In my opinion using "ntlm auth = yes? should be fine. Did you try using a simple RADIUS secret? In my experience long secrets or ones containing special characters don?t work very well. I

Hi Alexander, I'm terribly sorry. We didnt have the "ntlm auth" parameter configured on the DCs at all. I added it and it just works. Thanks for your help. Now I just need to figure out how I can make WLAN-specific LDAP-Group authentication. e. g. production WLAN needs LDAP group "wlan_production" and management WLAN needs the "wlan_management" group. I

Hello All, After updating to sernet-samba-4.6.4, ntlm_auth doesn't appear to work for me with challenge and nt-responses. I'm using ntlm_auth in freeradius to authenticate my wifi users against my AD. In sernet-samba-4.2.14 it was working perfectly. My freeradius server is an AD Member, and I've got two other sernet-samba-4.6.4 AD DC's. $ ntlm_auth --request-nt-key

Am 30.08.19 um 13:09 schrieb L.P.H. van Belle via samba: > Now Christian, this failes for me. > radtest -t mschap 'NTDOM\username" 'passwd' localhost 0 testing > ( MS-CHAP-Error = "\000E=691 R=1 C=58f41f1a946ac94a V=2") > > So my question here is, are the username at REALM logins also working for you. > And are you using in smb.conf : winbind use

Dear List, My domain +/- works, so I try to fix rest services based on domain NT/AD.... I use WiFi authorization with PEAP/MSCHAPv2 + freeradius (before migration it works). And after migration autorization does not work. Freeradius server is on samba domain member. So i check domain connectivity: [root at see-you-later samba]# net ads testjoin Join is OK [root at see-you-later samba]#

We have this running but on a DC (Samba 4.10.7). we have this line in /etc/raddb/mods-enabled/mschap. Only this line! DOMAIN is the actual netbio name of the domain. ntlm_auth = "/usr/bin/ntlm_auth --allow-mschapv2 --request-nt-key --username=%{mschap:User-Name:-None} --domain=DOMAIN --challenge=%{mschap:Challenge:-00} --nt-response=%{mschap:NT-Response:-00}" Do you users login in

Hello, We have samba 3.0.23 installed. We are using free radius to take authentication requests from a nortel vpn server and using ntlm_auth trying to authenticate users against AD. This setup works fine when on the AD side ntlmv1 and ntlmv2 are enabled. (IE. Users can authenticate). However, when only ntlmv2 is enabled users are unable to authenticate. I have searched various places and while

Guys, Christian, Marco, Thank you very much. Marco, you have the best internal wiki :-) Very very usefull. Whooe.. Most is working atm. And as always the solution was so simpel.. I forgot... To .. Add... ntlm auth = mschapv2-and-ntlmv2-only To the DC's smb.conf. :-/ pretty stupid.. But. So far, it looks good. I've tested now. radtest -t mschap username 'passwd'

Hello, I am trying to walk through the following document: http://homepages.lu/charlesschwartz/radius/freeRadius_AD_tutorial.pdf in order to authenticate Cisco router and switch logins against FreeRadius/Active Directory. Using the HowTo, I have successfully joined a FC2 box to our Windows 2003 AD for testing purposes. I have also successfully used the manual ntlm_auth command to authenticate