similar to: clients not connecting to samba shares

On 01-04-2023 20:38, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > > On 01/04/2023 19:10, Gary Dale via samba wrote: > > >> I tried using Samba once rather than NFS but that broke things. I keep my mail on the server and Thunderbird didn't work properly. Reverting to NFS fixed that. Also, Samba shares seemed slower and less reliable. NFS just works. > > I use

Currently I have a mail server running postfix and dovecot with users in mysql. I have Outlook (blich) clients checking IMAP mail on the server. I'd like to build some fault-tolerance into that system in case I have hardware failure. I've read through: http://wiki.dovecot.org/MailLocation/SharedDisk but I feel I need more information. My basic understanding is that I'll need 2

On 2023-04-11 04:15, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > > On 11/04/2023 00:19, Gary Dale via samba wrote: >> On 2023-04-05 09:56, Gary Dale via samba wrote: >>> On 2023-04-04 19:36, Gary Dale via samba wrote: >>>> On 2023-04-02 02:49, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 02/04/2023 04:54, Gary Dale via

On 2023-04-05 09:56, Gary Dale via samba wrote: > On 2023-04-04 19:36, Gary Dale via samba wrote: >> On 2023-04-02 02:49, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 02/04/2023 04:54, Gary Dale via samba wrote: >>> >>>> I could, but that seems like overkill. A complete second (virtually >>>> identical) system to administer and

On 11/04/2023 00:19, Gary Dale via samba wrote: > On 2023-04-05 09:56, Gary Dale via samba wrote: >> On 2023-04-04 19:36, Gary Dale via samba wrote: >>> On 2023-04-02 02:49, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> On 02/04/2023 04:54, Gary Dale via samba wrote: >>>> >>>>> I could, but that seems like overkill. A

On 01/04/2023 19:10, Gary Dale via samba wrote: > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Idmap_config_ad in the Configuring the > ad Back End section. Yes, but right at the top there is a warning box that says: ID mapping back ends are not supported in the smb.conf file on a Samba Active Directory (AD) domain controller (DC). For details, see Failure To Access Shares on Domain Controllers If

On 2023-04-01 15:30, William Edwards via samba wrote: >> Op 1 apr. 2023 om 18:53 heeft Gary Dale via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> het volgende geschreven: >> >> ?On 2023-04-01 11:48, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: >>> >>>> On 01/04/2023 16:15, Gary Dale via samba wrote: >>>>>> The problem is, you shouldn't really have Linux

Am 25.04.2011 19:02, schrieb Osvaldo Alvarez Pozo: > hi all > > We have an ocfs2 cluster compose of 4 Debian lenny serveurs wich have > access to an ISCSI LUN we have create a partition on this Lun and > formated this partition as OCFS2. > 2 serveurs does mail delivery (SMTP) and the two other are pop/imap > servers. The smtp servers use dovecot LDA to deliver to mailboxes.

On 2023-04-01 15:13, Kees van Vloten via samba wrote: > > On 01-04-2023 20:38, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: >> >> >> On 01/04/2023 19:10, Gary Dale via samba wrote: >> >>> https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Idmap_config_ad in the Configuring >>> the ad Back End section. >> >> Yes, but right at the top there is a warning box that says:

On 2023-03-29 23:28, Gary Dale via samba wrote: > On 2023-03-29 15:50, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: >> >> >> On 29/03/2023 20:06, Gary Dale via samba wrote: >>>> >>> Following the advice of >>> https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Distribution-specific_Package_Installation, >>> below the installation report after I did a more thorough

On 2023-03-29 15:50, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > > On 29/03/2023 20:06, Gary Dale via samba wrote: >>> >> Following the advice of >> https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Distribution-specific_Package_Installation, >> below the installation report after I did a more thorough purging of >> Samba-related stuff. I took the further advice and changed the

There is a bug in ocfs2 1.4 if you are using it you should be looking for upgrading to ocfs2 1.6 I have several performance problens with ocfs2 but now i guess the problem is the webmail client that we are using. I have several post here about it. I will write a new one as soon as i found the solution. Anyway, why use lmtp over lda ? My setup have about 5000 active acounts all in maildir.

On 11/04/2023 13:36, Gary Dale via samba wrote: > On 2023-04-11 04:15, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: >> >> >> What 'Debian distribution-specific' installation did you follow ? > The one linked to in AD DC wiki. Where abouts is this link ? I checked here: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_Samba_as_an_Active_Directory_Domain_Controller But couldn't

On 28/03/2023 16:24, Gary Dale via samba wrote: > On 2023-03-28 04:13, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: >> >> >> On 27/03/2023 23:55, Gary Dale via samba wrote: >>> My Samba setup was working until several months ago. I didn't do >>> anything to it that I can recall but it stopped letting my Windows >>> VMs connect. When I use smbclient to try to

On 2023-04-11 10:12, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > > On 11/04/2023 13:36, Gary Dale via samba wrote: >> On 2023-04-11 04:15, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: >>> >>> >>> What 'Debian distribution-specific' installation did you follow ? >> The one linked to in AD DC wiki. > > Where abouts is this link ? > I checked here: >

On 2023-04-02 02:49, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > > On 02/04/2023 04:54, Gary Dale via samba wrote: > >> I could, but that seems like overkill. A complete second (virtually >> identical) system to administer and update just to hive off the >> authentication task. >> > > To be honest, I would run two DC's just for authentication and other >

30.03.2023 06:25, Gary Dale via samba ?????: .. > Baokports are for people who need something that the stable version doesn't provide. That's not me. I run Debian/Stable on my servers for a reason. I > run Testing on my workstation because I want to help test things. And I run it my new laptop because it requires drivers that aren't available in Stable. Right now you need a

On 01/04/2023 21:18, Gary Dale via samba wrote: > I only have one user (me) and no additional groups. The only reason I'm > even looking at this is because Windows seems to have broken my older > setup. Rowland has been pushing Samba accounts as the way to fix it. And I have been pushing Samba accounts because in your first post, you posted a log fragment that showed you were

On 02/04/2023 04:54, Gary Dale via samba wrote: > I could, but that seems like overkill. A complete second (virtually > identical) system to administer and update just to hive off the > authentication task. > To be honest, I would run two DC's just for authentication and other Samba machines as Unix domain members. However, I cannot force you to do anything, all I can do is

On 01/04/2023 16:15, Gary Dale via samba wrote: >> >> The problem is, you shouldn't really have Linux groups per se, you >> should have Windows groups that are also Linux groups i.e. everything >> is in AD. > > That's not a great idea. It would mean I'd have to modify every Linux > system. Possibly > And can Linux groups even have a domain let