similar to: 6387475 chmod ACL parse error not generating error message

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 #$ setfacl -m u:mf:r bla #$ getfacl bla # file: bla # owner: root # group: root user::rw- user:mf:r-- group::r-- mask::r-- other::r-- It is readable by mf like intended. #$ chmod go-rwx bla #$ getfacl bla # file: bla # owner: root # group: root user::rw- user:mf:r-- #effective:--- group::r-- #effective:--- mask::--- other::--- It is not

How can I tell if option "with-acl-support" is compiled in Solaris smbd? Here's the output using ldd: bash-2.05$ ldd /usr/local/samba/sbin/smbd libldap.so.2 => /usr/lib/libldap.so.2 liblber.so.2 => /usr/lib/liblber.so.2 libgssapi_krb5.so.2 => /usr/lib/libgssapi_krb5.so.2 libkrb5.so.3 => /usr/lib/libkrb5.so.3 libk5crypto.so.3

Author: eschrock Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: e5f70a6fc5010aa205f244a25a9cdb950e0dae89 Log message: 6366222 zdb(1M) needs to use largefile primitives when reading label 6366267 zfs broke non-BUILD64 compilation of libsec Files: update: usr/src/cmd/zdb/zdb.c update: usr/src/lib/libsec/Makefile

Author: Darren Moffat <Darren.Moffat at Sun.COM> Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Latest revision: 957d30a3607ed9f3cbe490da5894d1e1b2104033 Total changesets: 28 Log message: resync onnv_105 partial for 6713916 Files: usr/src/Makefile.lint usr/src/Targetdirs usr/src/cmd/Makefile usr/src/cmd/Makefile.cmd usr/src/cmd/acctadm/Makefile usr/src/cmd/acctadm/acctadm.xcl

I am the maintainer of GDM, and I am noticing that GDM has a problem when running on a ZFS filesystem, as with Indiana. When GDM (the GNOME Display Manager) starts the login GUI, it runs the following commands on Solaris: /usr/bin/setfacl -m user:gdm:rwx,mask:rwx /dev/audio /usr/bin/setfacl -m user:gdm:rwx,mask:rwx /dev/audioctl It does this because the login GUI programs are run as the

Right now, FreeBSD supports one type of ACLs - so called POSIX.1e ACLs. They are natural extension of the traditional Unix permissions, and for a long time were the only nonproprietary ACL type in Unix systems. Times change, and now there are several problems with them: they never actually become standard (the draft they are based on was withdrawn); this results in minor incompatibilities

Thanks. I am still not sure whether option "with-acl-support" has been compiled in the smbd. The following is the output: Build environment: Built by: root@hxwu-dt-tt Built on: Tue Dec 23 15:00:40 CST 2003 Built using: gcc Build host: SunOS hxwu-dt-tt 5.9 Generic_112233-08 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Blade-100 SRCDIR: /space/hxwu/swinstall/samba-3.0.1/source

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9377 Summary: acls ignored when using neither --perms nor --chmod Product: rsync Version: 3.0.9 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: chrysn at fsfe.org

Author: sjelinek Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: e2d8706d226b8bdada8284689c37d35a33396b15 Log message: 6409257 /etc/vfstab isn''t properly aligned 6409251 typo in stmsboot 6409254 unused variables in svc-syseventd 6409228 typo in aclutils.h Contributed by Rainer Orth <ro at TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>. Files: update: usr/src/cmd/initpkg/vfstab.sh update:

Hi, I?m trying to join a new FreeBSD 14.2 system (UFS FS) running Samba 4.20 to an existing (Samba) AD (basically following https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Joining_a_Samba_DC_to_an_Existing_Active_Directory). It has worked up until me trying to reset the sysvol ACLs after syncing it over from the other DC: root at addc:~ # samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset ERROR(<class

Hi, S10U3: It seems, that ufs POSIX-ACLs are not properly translated to zfs ACL4 entries, when one xfers a directory tree from UFS to ZFS. Test case: Assuming one has an user A and B, both belonging to group G and having their umask set to 022: 1) On UFS - as user A do: mkdir /dir chmod 0775 /dir setfacl -m d:u::rwx,d:g::rwx,d:o:r-x,d:m:rwx /dir # samba would

Hi I am trying to get a non privileged user to update config files for apache httpd and have attempted the following: I have set the following permissions: setfacl -m user:deployer:--x /etc/httpd setfacl -R -m u:deployer:rwx,o::--- /etc/httpd/conf.d setfacl -R -m u:deployer:rwx,o::--- /etc/httpd/conf I then have a script that is run as the deployer user to checkout config files from svn and

I want to modify ACL on files which are on a win2K3 server from a Debian Sarge server. my config. is: Linux Debian Sarge testing with kernel 2.6 samba 3.0.22 configured with winbind krb5 installed, the Linux server is member of a AD domain on witch the win2K3 server is a domain controller. I want to do the following (as root): smbmount //mywin2k3server/share /mnt/smb/mountingfolder -o

Please if anyone has any info... Neil Wilson wrote: > Hi guys, > > I've got a problem where if I set permissions on a folder(Admin) > "setfacl -R -d -m u::rwx,g::wrx,o::- Admin/" and "setfacl -m o:- Admin" > > I get the following. > > mail:/data/samba/shared # getfacl Admin/ > # file: Admin > # owner: BCP+administrator > # group: samba

Hi, I recently tried to use ACLs with samba. XFS is running, I can set ACLs using setfacl and read them with getfacl, no problem so far. Samba compiled fine with '--with-acl-support'. Now I set up a share with 'nt acl support = yes', put there a file and added an acl with 'setfacl': root@edjo[ACLTEST]# getfacl datei.txt # file: datei.txt # owner: odenbach # group:

hi, I have a question here: May I use the win2k gui interface for adding a user rights to a file (I mean with ACL, equivalent to "setfacl -m u:test:rwx myfile" for example) OR May I use the setfacl command or another tool like acl tool into webmin (I use it and it works good) ? Cause I have tryed to add rights for a user onto a file into gui windows, but the logs say that I don'

I use this script to create folders for users #!/bin/bash if [ ! -e /data/homes/$1/$2 ]; then /usr/bin/mkdir -p /data/homes/$1/$2 /usr/bin/chown "$2":"Domain Users" /data/homes/$1/$2 /usr/bin/chmod g+s /data/homes/$1/$2 /usr/bin/chmod 770 /data/homes/$1/$2 /usr/bin/setfacl -m g:"domain admins":rwx /data/homes/$1/$2

I will choose to use the winbind. Based on the link that Rowland said: https://wiki.samba.org /index.php/Setup_Samba_as_an_AD_Domain_Member I followed the steps as described in the tutorial. I created symlinks. In the main DC I added this line in smb.conf: idmap_ldb: use RFC2307 = yes Changed /etc/nsswitch.conf passwd: files winbind shadow: files group: files winbind hosts:

On 22/11/15 10:04, Andrey Repin wrote: > Greetings, jimc! > >> After much wailing and gnashing of teeth, I did a setfacl. > Unfortunately, Samba does not use POSIX ACL's, if its own ACL's are present on > files. (If at all.) > Unless you have it configured for POSIX ACL's, but that's not the case for DC. Samba doesn't use ACLs at all, it is just a bridge

Hi guys, I've got a problem where if I set permissions on a folder(Admin) "setfacl -R -d -m u::rwx,g::wrx,o::- Admin/" and "setfacl -m o:- Admin" I get the following. mail:/data/samba/shared # getfacl Admin/ # file: Admin # owner: BCP+administrator # group: samba user::rwx user:samba:rwx group::rwx group:BCP+admin:r-x mask::rwx other::--- default:user::rwx