similar to: 6309217 gcc and "ac" cfgadm plugin don''t get along

We recently upgraded last week to OpenSolaris Development snv_128a and all things went fine, zpool still works, etc. Our disks come off a Hitachi Disk Array and we have 2 qLogic fiber cards in our server. "cfgadm -al" use to report the cards and "luxadm probe" use to return all the disks on the array. "luxadm probe" now returns "ERROR: No Fibre Channel Adapters

Author: vikram Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: 7cb2dd61ac3bb5d96888dbfeb5be96c2ab5b7ff0 Log message: 6264767 cfgadm expects to write into string constants Files: update: usr/src/cmd/cfgadm/Makefile update: usr/src/cmd/cfgadm/cfgadm.c update: usr/src/lib/cfgadm_plugins/usb/common/cfga_configfile.c

Folks, I''m trying to figure out whether we should give ZFS / mpxio a shot on one of our research servers, or simply skip it (as we have previously). In Nov 2009 Cindy responded to a thread concerning ZFS device issues, cfgadm, and mpxio: http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/zfs-discuss/2009-November/033496.html I''ve got an x2270 with the Sun EZ-SAS HBA and external SATA

Author: akolb Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: 9d3008a3418986c9f79c8afb06bca932abb62b95 Log message: 6283577 cfgadm configure panic - NULL pointer (mmu_fsr) dereferenced in module "ip" Files: update: usr/src/uts/common/inet/ip/ip_squeue.c

Hi all, Can anyone explain to me, or point me to any docs that explain how the following numbers map together? I have multiple LUNS exported to my HBA''s from multiple EMC arrays. zpool status, and /dev/dsk show device names like: c0t6006048000038794003753594D333837d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t6006048000038794003753594D333838d0 ONLINE 0 0 0

Hi guys, I have a quick question, I am playing around with ZFS and here''s what I did. I created a storage pool with several drives. I unplugged 3 out of 5 drives from the array, currently: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM gpool UNAVAIL 0 0 0 insufficient replicas raidz1 UNAVAIL 0 0 0 insufficient replicas c8t2d0 UNAVAIL 0 0

If it''s of interest, I''ve written up some articles on my experiences of building a ZFS NAS box which you can read here: http://breden.org.uk/2008/03/02/a-home-fileserver-using-zfs/ I used CIFS to share the filesystems, but it will be a simple matter to use NFS instead: issue the command ''zfs set sharenfs=on pool/filesystem'' instead of ''zfs set

So, I was running my full backup last night, backing up my main data pool zp1, and it seems to have hung. Any suggestions for additional data gathering? -bash-3.2$ zpool status zp1 pool: zp1 state: ONLINE status: The pool is formatted using an older on-disk format. The pool can still be used, but some features are unavailable. action: Upgrade the pool using ''zpool

Hello SUN gurus I do not know if this is supported, I have a created a zpool consisting of the SAN resources and created a zfs file system. Using third part software I have taken snapshots of all luns in the zfs pool. My question is in a recovery situation is there a way for me to mount the snapshots and import the pool while the original is still active. Right now all I am able to do is export

Hi all, I''m getting a very strange problem with a recent OpenSolaris b134 install. System is: Supermicro X5DP8-G2 BIOS 1.6a 2x Supermicro AOC-SAT2-MV8 1.0b 11 Seagate Barracuda 1TB ES.2 ST31000340NS drives If I have any of the 11 1TB Seagate drives plugged into the controller, the AOC-SAT2-MV8 BIOS appears to detect them just fine, but I get the following problems: 1. Grub takes a

Hello, I have a CyberPower CP1500PFCLCD and I'm trying to get nut to see it under OpenIndiana. All search online suggested that it basically can't happen, but I decided to ask again, maybe things have changed since then. The UPS can be seen by the system: # /usr/sbin/cfgadm -lv usb9/1.1 Ap_Id Receptacle Occupant Condition Information When Type

Hi, to shorten the story, I describe the situation. I have 4 disks in a zfs/svm config: c2t9d0 9G c2t10d0 9G c2t11d0 18G c2t12d0 18G c2t11d0 is devided in two: selecting c2t11d0 [disk formatted] /dev/dsk/c2t11d0s0 is in use by zpool storedge. Please see zpool(1M). /dev/dsk/c2t11d0s1 is part of SVM volume stripe:d11. Please see metaclear(1M). /dev/dsk/c2t11d0s2 is in use by zpool storedge. Please

So I have attached to my system two 7-disk SCSI arrays, each of 18.2 GB disks. Each of them is a RAID-Z1 zpool. I had a disk I thought was a dud, so I pulled the fifth disk in my array and put the dud in. Sure enough, Solaris started spitting errors like there was no tomorrow in dmesg, and wouldn''t use the disk. Ah well. Remove it, put the original back in - hey, Solaris still thinks

Hi all, yesterday we had a drive failure on a fc-al jbod with 14 drives. Suddenly the zpool using that jbod stopped to respond to I/O requests and we get tons of the following messages on /var/adm/messages: Sep 3 15:20:10 fb2 scsi: [ID 107833 kern.warning] WARNING: /scsi_vhci/disk at g20000004cfd81b9f (sd52): Sep 3 15:20:10 fb2 SCSI transport failed: reason ''timeout'':

hi all, i would like to ask some questions regarding best practices for zfs recovery if disk errors occur. currently i have zfs boot (nv62) and the following setup: 2 si3224 controllers (each 4 sata disks) 8 sata disks, same size, same type i have two pools: a) rootpool b) datapool the rootpool is a mirrored pool, where every disk has a slice (the s0, which is 5 % of the whole disk) and this

Greetings, We''re trying out a new JBOD here. Multipath (mpxio) is not working, and we could use some feedback and/or troubleshooting advice. The OS is oi151a7, running on an existing server with a 54TB pool of internal drives. I believe the server hardware is not relevant to the JBOD issue, although the internal drives do appear to the OS with multipath device names (despite the fact

I read Ben Rockwood''s blog post about Thumpers and SMART (http://cuddletech.com/blog/pivot/entry.php?id=993). Will the SUNWhd package only work on a Thumper? Can I use this on my snv_101 system with AMD 64 bit processor and nVidia SATA?

hello, all I am have constraint disk space (only 8GB) while running os inside vm. Now i want to add more. It is easy to add for vm but how can i update fs in os? I cannot use autoexpand because it doesn''t implemented in my system: $ uname -a SunOS sopen 5.11 snv_111b i86pc i386 i86pc If it was 171 it would be grate, right? Doing following: o added new virtual HDD (it becomes

Hello all, This is not so much a question but rather a "how-to" for posterity. Comments and possible fixes are welcome, though. I''m toying (for work) with a Solaris 10 VM, and it has a dedicated virtual HDD for data and zones. The template VM had a 20Gb disk, but a particular application needs more. I hoped ZFS autoexpand would do the trick transparently, but it turned out

Author: wesolows Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: 38b525e0deacf617b34ac0322921cb3424c11a0a Log message: 6266620 mi2cv shouldn''t #include <note.h> 6285975 nightly can lie about the compiler being used for amd64 compilation 6297567 cw is needed for compiler-independence on SPARC Files: update: usr/src/Makefile update: usr/src/Makefile.master update: