similar to: Question on EATON UPS

Hi Jim, I?m using on Kali Linux. I?m not using a custom version and finally found the issue which was a hidden character staying in the ups.conf file. I rebuilt the file and everything worked out. Issue closed and many thanks for your help. Laurent From: Jim Klimov <jimklimov+nut at gmail.com> Sent: mercredi 29 mars 2023 13:22 To: laurenttaieb at free.fr Cc: nut-upsuser

On Thursday, March 9th, 2023 at 8:34 AM, Dan Langille via Nut-upsuser <nut-upsuser at alioth-lists.debian.net> wrote: >> The UPS has been defined in ups.conf as: >> >> [myups3] >> >> driver : usbhid-ups >> >> port = auto >> >> vendorid = 0463 >> >> productid = ffff >> >> desc = "5S" >> >> bus

The "unknown" fields mean the driver did not get that piece of information from libusb. In case of Manufacturer/Product which are unknown in the later post, but known in the first, I suppose you had another driver running, or the kernel still owned it (udev misbehavior, not handing it off after reconnections, etc.) and so exclusive access was not given to the new (currently reporting)

Thanks Larry, I tried. Got the following traces and the driver doesn?t start. 1.036797 [D2] - VendorID: 0463 1.036812 [D2] - ProductID: ffff 1.036826 [D2] - Manufacturer: unknown 1.036840 [D2] - Product: unknown 1.036872 [D2] - Serial Number: unknown 1.036912 [D2] - Bus: 002 1.036942 [D2] - Device: unknown 1.036965 [D2] - Device

Sounds like some other program is holding the port. Have you stopped other NUT drivers for the device (e.g. via auto-resuscitating services) before starting this one? Does udev, ugen or similar facility have the configuration to hand off this device to NUT run-time user? (BTW, if you are now testing a custom build - was it configured to use same accounts as pre-packaged variant)? On Fri, Mar 24,

Laurent Taieb via Nut-upsuser wrote on 3/9/23 9:25 AM: > > Hi NUT Users, > > One of my APC UPS is having battery issue and apparently we cannot > change battery in that UPS. (not super green?) > > I have purchased an EATON UPS and added the ref in ups.conf > > When restarting the driver, I got this error > > >0.030612[D2] Checking device 2 of 10 (0463/FFFF)

I?m making some progress I believe? I switched off and switched on the UPS further to the laptop having started the daemon and I?m not getting the same error message which is probably due to the server working in the background still locking the device I think the daemon starts but gets into an infinite loop and doesn?t finish and hand back control. Here are the updated traces I got by

Hi NUT Users, One of my APC UPS is having battery issue and apparently we cannot change battery in that UPS. (not super green?) I have purchased an EATON UPS and added the ref in ups.conf When restarting the driver, I got this error > 0.030612 [D2] Checking device 2 of 10 (0463/FFFF) > 0.287659 [D2] - VendorID: 0463 > 0.287853 [D2] - ProductID: ffff >

Also, just in case - are you in a virtualized environment? Is there (intentional or not) USB pass-through to the UPSes? My hint is, we had cases where a host or guest grabbed the device but it was not apparent from the part of system running NUT. Jim On Fri, Mar 24, 2023, 23:23 Jim Klimov <jimklimov+nut at gmail.com> wrote: > Sounds like some other program is holding the port. Have

Thanks for the info! First, regarding the later detail about starting `usbhid-ups`: the "Resource busy" indicates that likely an earlier instance of the NUT driver (in its own service unit) is still running and holding the device. In a worse case, some other programs might consider this a HID device (same class family as keyboards and mice) and grab it somehow, or it gets passed through

Normally yes - enable and start the target and the particular services relevant to your setup. For the binary you have from packaging (if not rebuilt as suggested earlier), set debug_min=3 in ups.conf section for upscode2, to currently trade driver viability for some storage traffic with more logs :\ Sorry about that, Jim On Wed, Jul 5, 2023, 02:29 Karl Schmidt <karl at lrak.net> wrote:

On 7/4/23 10:01PM, Jim Klimov wrote: > Normally yes - enable and start the target and the particular services relevant to your setup. > > For the binary you have from packaging (if not rebuilt as suggested earlier), set debug_min=3 in ups.conf section for > upscode2, to currently trade driver viability for some storage traffic with more logs :\ > > Sorry about?that, > Jim

Jan 19 05:50:13 mars nut-monitor[849]: Signal 15: exiting Jan 19 05:50:13 mars nut-monitor[849]: Network UPS Tools upsmon 2.8.0 Jan 19 05:50:13 mars systemd[1]: Stopping nut-monitor.service - Network UPS Tools - power device monitor and shutdown controller... Jan 19 05:50:13 mars systemd[1]: nut-monitor.service: Deactivated successfully. Jan 19 05:50:13 mars systemd[1]: Stopped nut-monitor.service

On 06/15/2017 04:32 PM, Arnaud Quette wrote: Hello > > .... still no reply from them ... > > is the guy you contacted Paul Henri? I wrote to a generic alias ( Ro-PQSupport ). Got a reply from a fellow Romanian who also CC:ed something looking like a list (List-EGPQCO-BUCRO-PQ ). I replied to both of them 5 days ago, received nothing since. > >>> Would you also

Ah, I thought you missed in my earlier reply the part about a bug with debug printouts in 2.8.0 (fixed on master since), did not comment on that when you replied with quoting... So, for now options are to bump debugging to 3+ or to build your own in one of many ways possible :\ On Wed, Jul 5, 2023, 06:23 Karl Schmidt <karl at lrak.net> wrote: > On 7/4/23 10:01PM, Jim Klimov wrote: >

Errata coming up for NUT v2.8.2: * it was discovered that the nut-driver-enumerator (NDE) script had a regression which caused it to not reload nut-driver instances (systemd, SMF) when `ups.conf` edits happened. * on a related note, it may be possible that "live" driver reloading (at least on master branch) does not reduce debug verbosity to zero when `debug_min 0` is active in its

Errata coming up for NUT v2.8.2: * it was discovered that the nut-driver-enumerator (NDE) script had a regression which caused it to not reload nut-driver instances (systemd, SMF) when `ups.conf` edits happened. * on a related note, it may be possible that "live" driver reloading (at least on master branch) does not reduce debug verbosity to zero when `debug_min 0` is active in its

Hi Manuel, 2017-06-14 15:16 GMT+02:00 Manuel Wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro>: > Hello > > > > On 06/14/2017 03:32 PM, Arnaud Quette wrote: > > > > On Jun 7, 2017, at 5:47 AM, Manuel Wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> > wrote: > >> > >>> > If that matters, the OS is a fully updated CentOS 6.9 and this >>>

On 19.01.24 09:00, Jim Klimov via Nut-upsuser wrote: >Well, from your logs it seems that at 05:17:03 your nut-server (upsd) >restarted, so an upsmon reconnection attempt at 05:17:09 had an issue with >that (config not all applied? strange a bit) but since 05:17:14 it is okay. > >Maybe a few too many banners shown from upsmon, while its same uptime seems >to continue. Maybe

Cheers, With https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/pull/1906 and https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/pull/1912 (and probably some more later), I've been enhancing NUT driver framework with support for live reload of configuration, primarily to acknowledge changes to debug_min setting in ups.conf - but made in a generic fashion that specific drivers may take advantage of for their