similar to: [PATCH 6.2 regression fix] drm/nouveau/kms: Fix backlight registration

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "[PATCH 6.2 regression fix] drm/nouveau/kms: Fix backlight registration"

2023 Mar 28
1
[PATCH 6.2 regression fix] drm/nouveau/kms: Fix backlight registration
Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul <lyude at redhat.com> (Also note to Mark: this is my way of letting you know someone fixed the regression with backlight controls upstream, looking into the weird bright screen after resume issue) On Sun, 2023-03-26 at 22:54 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > The nouveau code used to call drm_fb_helper_initial_config() from > nouveau_fbcon_init() before calling
2018 Aug 23
6
[PATCH 0/5] drm/nouveau: Backlight fixes and cleanup
This series fixes some issues with nouveau's backlight support that were causing kernel panics on module reloads, specifically on systems with nouveau handling the backlight of one of the displays. While we're at it, let's cleanup nouveau_backlight.c as well Lyude Paul (5): drm/nouveau: Check backlight IDs are >= 0, not > 0 drm/nouveau: Move backlight device into
2018 Aug 29
5
[PATCH v2 0/5] drm/nouveau: Backlight fixes and cleanup
Next version of https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/48596/ . Made some important changes to the refactoring patch, but everything else is the same. Lyude Paul (5): drm/nouveau: Check backlight IDs are >= 0, not > 0 drm/nouveau: Move backlight device into nouveau_connector drm/nouveau: s/nouveau_backlight_exit/nouveau_backlight_fini/ drm/nouveau: Cleanup indenting in
2018 Aug 29
6
[PATCH RESEND v3 0/6] drm/nouveau: Backlight fixes and cleanup
Forgot to send 6 patches instead of five since there's one new one now, whoops! No actual changes, next version of https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/48596/ Lyude Paul (6): drm/nouveau: Check backlight IDs are >= 0, not > 0 drm/nouveau: Add NV_PRINTK_ONCE and variants drm/nouveau: Move backlight device into nouveau_connector drm/nouveau:
2018 Aug 29
5
[PATCH v3 0/5] drm/nouveau: Backlight fixes and cleanup
Next version of https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/48596/ . Added NV_INFO_ONCE and made "Move backlight device into nouveau_connector" use that instead so we don't print the GMUX warning more then once. Lyude Paul (5): drm/nouveau: Add NV_PRINTK_ONCE and variants drm/nouveau: Move backlight device into nouveau_connector drm/nouveau:
2018 Sep 06
7
[PATCH v4 0/6] Backlight fixes and cleanup
Refactor for Ben, hopefully this time this should apply to his tree. Next version of https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/48596/ No changes otherwise. Lyude Paul (6): drm/nouveau: Check backlight IDs are >= 0, not > 0 drm/nouveau: Add NV_PRINTK_ONCE and variants drm/nouveau: Move backlight device into nouveau_connector drm/nouveau:
2018 Feb 19
1
[PATCH v2] bl: fix backlight regression
fixes d9c0aadc5aa241df26ce8301d34a8418919fb5ae Suggested-by: Ben Skeggs <skeggsb at redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Karol Herbst <kherbst at redhat.com> --- drm/nouveau/nouveau_backlight.c | 10 +++++----- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/drm/nouveau/nouveau_backlight.c b/drm/nouveau/nouveau_backlight.c index 380f3402..55172655 100644 ---
2016 May 21
2
[PATCH] drm/nouveau: add Maxwell to backlight initialization
Signed-off-by: Faris Alsalama <farisbenbrahem at gmail.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_backlight.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_backlight.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_backlight.c index 89eb460..dd1cc9b 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_backlight.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_backlight.c @@ -232,6
2018 Aug 23
1
[PATCH 1/5] drm/nouveau: Check backlight IDs are >= 0, not > 0
Patches 1-5 are Reviewed-by: Karol Herbst <kherbst at redhat.com> I think it might be worth to test those patches on a system without any backlight devices just to verify we don't break things, but the code looked good already, so maybe we don't really need to test. On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 3:21 AM, Lyude Paul <lyude at redhat.com> wrote: > Remember, ida IDs start at 0, not
2013 Sep 01
0
[PATCH] drm/nv50: Fix backlight not working when PWM_DIV is uninitialised
Known issues before merge: - Currently requires acpi_backlight=vendor kernel param - 0x5e always valid? Signed-off-by: Roy Spliet <r.spliet at student.tudelft.nl> Tested-by: Rick Hendricksen --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_backlight.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++--- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_display.c | 4 ++++ drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_display.h | 7 +++++++ 3 files
2018 Feb 16
0
[PATCH] bl: fix backlight regression
fixes d9c0aadc5aa241df26ce8301d34a8418919fb5ae Signed-off-by: Karol Herbst <kherbst at redhat.com> --- drm/nouveau/nouveau_backlight.c | 7 +++++++ drm/nouveau/nv50_display.c | 4 ++-- drm/nouveau/nv50_display.h | 4 ++++ 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drm/nouveau/nouveau_backlight.c b/drm/nouveau/nouveau_backlight.c index 380f3402..057708da
2016 Apr 15
11
[PATCH 1/2] nouveau/bl: Assign different names to interfaces
Currently, every backlight interface created by Nouveau uses the same name, nv_backlight. This leads to a sysfs warning as it tries to create an already existing folder. This patch adds a incremented number to the name, but keeps the initial name as nv_backlight, to avoid possibly breaking userspace; the second interface will be named nv_backlight1, and so on. Fixes: fdo#86539 Signed-off-by:
2016 Nov 13
1
[PATCH v3 1/2] nouveau/bl: Assign different names to interfaces
From: Pierre Moreau <pierre.morrow at free.fr> Currently, every backlight interface created by Nouveau uses the same name, nv_backlight. This leads to a sysfs warning as it tries to create an already existing folder. This patch adds a incremented number to the name, but keeps the initial name as nv_backlight, to avoid possibly breaking userspace; the second interface will be named
2016 Apr 15
2
[PATCH 1/2] nouveau/bl: Assign different names to interfaces
On 11:06 AM - Apr 15 2016, Ilia Mirkin wrote: > On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 10:57 AM, Pierre Moreau <pierre.morrow at free.fr> wrote: > > Currently, every backlight interface created by Nouveau uses the same name, > > nv_backlight. This leads to a sysfs warning as it tries to create an already > > existing folder. This patch adds a incremented number to the name, but keeps
2018 Aug 23
0
[PATCH 1/5] drm/nouveau: Check backlight IDs are >= 0, not > 0
Remember, ida IDs start at 0, not 1! Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude at redhat.com> Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org Cc: Jeffery Miller <jmiller at neverware.com> Cc: Karol Herbst <kherbst at redhat.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_backlight.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_backlight.c
2018 Aug 29
0
[PATCH v2 1/5] drm/nouveau: Check backlight IDs are >= 0, not > 0
Remember, ida IDs start at 0, not 1! Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude at redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Karol Herbst <kherbst at redhat.com> Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_backlight.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_backlight.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_backlight.c index
2018 Jul 05
4
[PATCH 0/2] drm/nouveau: Fix panic on nouveau unload.
If have a couple patches I found while looking at a panic I was seeing while unloading the nouveau module. Unloading the nouveau module on my optimus notebook machine causes the system to panic. This started occuring when moving from 4.4 to 4.14. These patches make it such that the system does not panic when unloading the module. 4.14 also requires commit 34112bf4935d ("drm/nouveau/fbcon:
2009 Feb 18
1
[PATCH] Add in-kernel backlight control support
Several nvidia-based systems don't support backlight control via the standard ACPI control mechanisms. Instead, it's necessary for the driver to modify the backlight control registers directly. This patch adds support for determining whether the registers appear to be in use, and if so registers a kernel backlight device to control them. The backlight can then be controlled via
2016 Apr 15
0
[PATCH 1/2] nouveau/bl: Assign different names to interfaces
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 10:57 AM, Pierre Moreau <pierre.morrow at free.fr> wrote: > Currently, every backlight interface created by Nouveau uses the same name, > nv_backlight. This leads to a sysfs warning as it tries to create an already > existing folder. This patch adds a incremented number to the name, but keeps > the initial name as nv_backlight, to avoid possibly breaking
2016 Apr 17
0
[PATCH v2 1/2] nouveau/bl: Assign different names to interfaces
Currently, every backlight interface created by Nouveau uses the same name, nv_backlight. This leads to a sysfs warning as it tries to create an already existing folder. This patch adds a incremented number to the name, but keeps the initial name as nv_backlight, to avoid possibly breaking userspace; the second interface will be named nv_backlight1, and so on. Bugzilla: