similar to: subfolders in the R folder

The "good reason" is all the tooling in R doesn't work with subfolders and would have to be rewritten. All the package check and build stuff. And that's assuming you don't want to change the basic flat package structure - for example to allow something like `library(foo)` to attach a package and `library(foo.bar)` to attach some subset of package `foo`. That would require

A quick drive-by-comment: What if 'R CMD build' would have an option to flatten R/ subfolders when building the tarball, e.g. R/unix/a.R R/windows/a.R R/a.R becomes: R/00__unix__a.R R/00__windows__a.R R/a.R ? Maybe that would be sufficient for most use cases. The only thing I can imagine is that source file references (e.g. in check NOTEs) will be toward the latter and not the

Hello: I have a server running CentOS 4.4. I just did a yum update and then rebooted the server. After the reboot, it stops after printing GRUB on the screen. Any ideas what happened? Thanks, Neil -- Neil Aggarwal, (832)245-7314, www.JAMMConsulting.com FREE! Eliminate junk email and reclaim your inbox. Visit http://www.spammilter.com for details.

Hi Hadley, Thanks for the counterpoint. Response below. On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 1:59 PM Hadley Wickham <h.wickham at gmail.com> wrote: > The existing behaviour seems inutitive to me. I would consider these > invariants for n vector x_i's each with size m: > > * nrow(rbind(x_1, x_2, ..., x_n)) equals n > Personally, no I wouldn't. I would consider m==0 a degenerate

Hi, it'd be great if you could update the documentation on the website that some models of the Belkin -UNV series will only work with the megatec(_usb) drivers. I wasted a lot of time on trying to get it to work with the wrong drivers, and would like to spare others the pain :-). Thanks, ~David P.S. Some forum post said that the stable megatec drivers don't work 100% with the belkin UPS,

Hi, it'd be great if you could update the documentation on the website that some models of the Belkin -UNV series will only work with the megatec(_usb) drivers. I wasted a lot of time on trying to get it to work with the wrong drivers, and would like to spare others the pain :-). Thanks, ~David P.S. Some forum post said that the stable megatec drivers don't work 100% with the belkin UPS,

On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 2:13 PM, Joerg Schilling <Joerg.Schilling at fokus.fraunhofer.de> wrote: > Les Mikesell <lesmikesell at gmail.com> wrote: > > There was no court case, but VERITAS published a modifed version of gtar where > additional code was added by binary only libraries from VERITAS. The FSF did > never try to discuss this is public even though everybody did

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2562 Bug ID: 2562 Summary: CanonicalizeHostname causes duplicate LocalForward attempts Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 7.1p1 Hardware: ix86 OS: Mac OS X Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: ssh

greetings, running Centos 4.1 i386 on a poweredge 1800, will be trying x86_64 tomorrow since apparently the processors are EM64. anyhow, I'm having issues with this unit producing segmentation faults on practically everything. this is not an issue just with Centos 4.x, but also RHEL 3. so I resorted to RH9, but had other issues with hardware drivers. Today, I installed OS and

So is yours. Why not say what SHOULD be done? Since we were discussing logging, including only the lines about logging seem to be a reasonable response to the original open-ended question. ?Please include the complete output of ?dovecot -n?? would get your point across instead of just letting you be a snarky ass. On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 1:14 PM Odhiambo Washington <odhiambo at gmail.com>

Hi, I compiled drm & xf86-video-nouveau to test nouveau yesterday -- the X server couldn't start. Today, Telek pointed me to drm/linux-core/drm_pciids.h, where I added my card. This made nouveau detect my card, and the xerver started successfully. I didn't test further -- for example I didn't compile the mesa nouveau code to enable 3D. So what should I test ? Snark PS1:

Óscar Fuentes <ofv at wanadoo.es> writes: > greened at obbligato.org (David A. Greene) writes: > >> Hmm...it's a build system, right? There's not much to add, really. >> Build systems should be really simple. All they need is dependencies >> and rules to build stuff. > > Oh, yes, sure, you're right. <g> Can't tell if you're being

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi list, I just did my daily news scan and saw some screenshots that illustrate the press release [0] announcing the first collisions at the LHC. Those screenshots show windows and buttons that exactly match my CentOS GNOME Desktop [1]. AFAIK, SuSE/Novell has different skins, as has (Open)Solaris and AIX, for instance. So, has there anybody more

Hello, folks! I'm trying to use R as a graphics program, to make some pretty graphs that will go into prosper slideshows. I wrote this fragment, from the R manual, into a file demo.R: x=seq(-3,3,0.1) postscript("cm_test.eps", width = 4.0, height = 3.0, horizontal = FALSE, onefile = FALSE, paper = "special", family =

Chayan Sarkar wrote: > Hi, > > I am trying to write a small pass. In my pass, I have inserted some > instruction and used that in another. But, during OPT it is showing > "Instruction does not dominate all uses" like following - > > %b.1 = bitcast i32 4 to i32 ; <i32> [#uses=8] %11 > = add i32 %a.1, %b.1 ;

On Jan 17, 2013, at 10:30 AM, Eli Bendersky <eliben at google.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Jim Grosbach <grosbach at apple.com> wrote: >> >> On Jan 17, 2013, at 9:57 AM, Dmitri Gribenko <gribozavr at gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 7:51 PM, Sean Silva <silvas at purdue.edu> wrote: >>>> On Thu,

On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 10:32 AM, Jim Grosbach <grosbach at apple.com> wrote: > > On Jan 17, 2013, at 10:30 AM, Eli Bendersky <eliben at google.com> wrote: > >> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Jim Grosbach <grosbach at apple.com> wrote: >>> >>> On Jan 17, 2013, at 9:57 AM, Dmitri Gribenko <gribozavr at gmail.com> wrote: >>>

On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 7:43 PM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > > On 09/13/2017 02:16 AM, C Bergström wrote: > > A completely non-technical point, but what's the current "polly" license? > Does integrating that code conflict in any way with the work being done to > relicense llvm? > > > Good question. I discussed this explicitly with

Hi Dmitry, Where were you expecting notice to have been given? If I recall correctly, the obsolescence of the C backend was mentioned many times on this mailing list, and as Owen notes, in the release notes since 2.8. I'm not trying to be snarky. You were obviously genuinely surprised by its removal, and that makes me wonder if where the core open source devs are expecting people to look for

3a. What part of the documentation needs the most immediate attention? 3b. Will anyone come after me with an axe if I move the entire corpus to ASCIIDOC markup? http://www.methods.co.nz/asciidoc/ 3c. Why isn't the content of the website a branch in the repo? Can we fix things so it is? Hint: If the website becomes a repo branch, I'll reorganize and rewrite that for clarity, too. --