similar to: 6238533 UFS O_DSYNC Logging Performance

Author: praks Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: 4c3b7ab574cc73502effa96c11c293e04fd54309 Log message: 6256083 Need a lightweight file page mapping mechanism to substitute segmap 6387639 segkpm segment set to incorrect size for amd64 Files: create: usr/src/uts/common/vm/vpm.c create: usr/src/uts/common/vm/vpm.h update: usr/src/pkgdefs/SUNWhea/prototype_com update:

Author: jkennedy Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: 6a727a093fbd6794a7ca69a71d9fa81f29c9364b Log message: 6251659 statvfs taking 30 second to complete performance regression s9 to s10 oracle 9ir2 starcat ufs Files: update: usr/src/uts/common/fs/ufs/ufs_alloc.c update: usr/src/uts/common/fs/ufs/ufs_inode.c update: usr/src/uts/common/fs/ufs/ufs_thread.c update:

Author: rbourbon Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: a40f0552fb65649aa4c6751b7dfa343fad066ef8 Log message: 4849565 smallfile too small - change to 64 bit 6207772 UFS freebehind can slow application performance due to text segment paging 6279932 35% drop in SPECweb2005 Support workload performance from snv_07 to snv_08 Files: update: usr/src/uts/common/fs/ufs/ufs_vnops.c

After about a day and a half or so of uptime, I'm getting the aforementioned panic on the server ... better then having it hang solid, but right now I'm not sure if this is replacing it, or just one being triggered earlier then the other ... First scan through Google, I came across some posts talking about NMBCLUSTERS ... since its at the same settings as my other server (the default)

Author: jkennedy Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: 931f9f0e5d2fb0b5da5bc6c0f77c10e668f842cf Log message: 4775289 fsck reports wrong state in superblock if there once has existed a largefile 6302747 Performance regression when deleting large files from a logging ufs filesystem 6362734 df output corrupt after under heavy stress Files: update: usr/src/cmd/fs.d/ufs/fsck/utilities.c update:

neptune# ps -M vmcore.1 -N kernel.debug -axl | grep inode | wc -l 961 and I have a vmcore to work on here !! :) (kgdb) proc 99643 (kgdb) bt #0 mi_switch () at machine/globals.h:119 #1 0x8014a1f9 in tsleep (ident=0x8a4ef600, priority=8, wmesg=0x80263d4a "inode", timo=0) at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_synch.c:479 #2 0x80141507 in acquire (lkp=0x8a4ef600, extflags=16777280,

Author: swilcox Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: 89bb7eb80bb8cb92f0071ea0085e6aa3d116f7f6 Log message: 6361469 tsufs hang on rm -rf command Files: update: usr/src/cmd/fs.d/ufs/mkfs/mkfs.c

Today my system coredumped (4.8-STABLE from Saturday), I believe it's somehow X11 related: X11 crashed first (signal 11). I was running it as root (I know I shouldn't). I didn't think about it and restarted X11. While it was starting, I had a look at the console, there was a bright white message: issignal. This shows up at X11 startup. Then the system coredumped. Below is more

Hello list, I have been fighting this problem for a few days now. I have changed memory and opened the case and monitored for heat. I have been getting the same panic about every 12 to 24 hours. I can let the system sit idle, or run it under a heavy load (cpu and disk), but the panics dont seem to be related to system load. It looks to me like a dangling pointer in softdep_update_inodeblock,

Author: owenr Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: 492ae9b21637b4b4c3e19d1556772aae3284a6f8 Log message: 4316952 ufs_fault_v should not attempt to queue more then 1 handler for a failure event 6350587 threads blocked in cv_wait_sig after a "forced" unmount on error never woken up Files: update: usr/src/uts/common/fs/ufs/ufs_lockfs.c update: usr/src/uts/common/fs/ufs/ufs_panic.c

Just trying to understand if anything might be going on with this crash dump or just faulty hardware ? dmesg at the end ---Mike # gdb -k /kernel.debug vmcore.0 GNU gdb 4.18 (FreeBSD) Copyright 1998 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions. Type

Not sure what all to do, but doing a 'gdb -k kernel.debug /dev/mem', a backtrack on one of the processes shows ... server has been up 12 days now, and running a June 8th kernel ... #0 0x20f4f0 in ?? () (kgdb) proc 67258 (kgdb) bt #0 mi_switch () at machine/globals.h:119 #1 0x8014a1f9 in tsleep (ident=0x8a3d2200, priority=8, wmesg=0x80263d4a "inode", timo=0) at

Author: prabahar Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: 027bdeb71f1847a9969d352a2d0be3ff968b35a9 Log message: 4913439 clri doesn''t first check for ufs superblock magic number before taking action Files: update: usr/src/cmd/fs.d/ufs/clri/clri.c

Hello. I'm having a 4.7Rp9 server which is since months quite unstable, so I've compiled a debug kernel and got a crash dump. I'm a programmer and I know a little how to use gdb, I'm not so expert about FreeBSD kernel insides however, so I can't get much from it. Any kind of help is appreciated. This is the crash message: IdlePTD at phsyical address 0x0032f000 initial pcb

The patch titled Subject: ufs: don't flush page immediately for DIRSYNC directories has been added to the -mm mm-unstable branch. Its filename is ufs-dont-flush-page-immediately-for-dirsync-directories.patch This patch will shortly appear at

New on CRAN: phpSerialize Version 0.8 Dieter Menne, dieter.menne at menne-biomed.de Serializes R objects for PHP import into an associative array. Main use is for building web pages with R-support. Has mainly been tested with lm,lme, nlme and their summaries. A web example is provide, showing -- How to start R from php/Apache -- How to pass variables from php to R via Environment -- How to

New on CRAN: phpSerialize Version 0.8 Dieter Menne, dieter.menne at menne-biomed.de Serializes R objects for PHP import into an associative array. Main use is for building web pages with R-support. Has mainly been tested with lm,lme, nlme and their summaries. A web example is provide, showing -- How to start R from php/Apache -- How to pass variables from php to R via Environment -- How to

Hi all, Does zfs and UFS will sit on same machine?. if yes is it possible to share zfs files using CIFS. Thanks Naveen -- This message posted from opensolaris.org

Hi stable, nice you see you again. I was one of those guys who was seeing constand panics on 24 hour boundaries but couldn't provide a backtrace due to the ar device not taking a dump. I installed a dedicated drive just to take the dump, and then didn't have a panic for a couple weeks. Now, I am back with, and I have traces to share. The first two, from 2003-09-27 and 2003-09-28

Hi, I have installed a FreeBSD-based samba fileserver for a customer and discovered belatedly that they make extensive use of setting Read-only attributes on the old NT server. All of the client machines are win9x. There are many users which need access to the files in question, the group permissions are set, with all files and dirs set to mode rwxrwx--- (770). The problem arises in that the