similar to: [libnbd PATCH v5 0/4] pass LISTEN_FDNAMES with systemd socket activation

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 300 matches similar to: "[libnbd PATCH v5 0/4] pass LISTEN_FDNAMES with systemd socket activation"

2023 Mar 23
20
[libnbd PATCH v3 00/19] pass LISTEN_FDNAMES with systemd socket activation
V3 was here: <http://mid.mail-archive.com/20230215141158.2426855-1-lersek at redhat.com>. See the Notes section on each patch for the v4 updates. The series is nearly ready for merging: every patch has at least one R-b tag, except "socket activation: avoid manipulating the sign bit". The series builds, and passes "make check" and "make check-valgrind", at
2023 Mar 24
2
[libnbd PATCH v3 19/19] socket activation: set LISTEN_FDNAMES
[attempting to loop in systemd folks; this started in libnbd at https://listman.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2023-March/031178.html - although I may have to retry since I'm not a usual subscriber of systemd-devel] On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 11:32:26AM +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > >> @@ -245,6 +245,9 @@ CONNECT_SA.START: > >> "LISTEN_PID=",
2023 Mar 23
1
[libnbd PATCH v3 19/19] socket activation: set LISTEN_FDNAMES
On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 01:10:16PM +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > When the user calls nbd_set_socket_activation_name before calling > nbd_connect_system_socket_activation, pass the name down to the server > through LISTEN_FDNAMES. This has no effect unless the new API has > been called to set the socket name to a non-empty string. > >
2023 Mar 24
4
[libnbd PATCH v3 19/19] socket activation: set LISTEN_FDNAMES
On 3/23/23 20:27, Eric Blake wrote: > On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 01:10:16PM +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote: >> When the user calls nbd_set_socket_activation_name before calling >> nbd_connect_system_socket_activation, pass the name down to the server >> through LISTEN_FDNAMES. This has no effect unless the new API has >> been called to set the socket name to a non-empty string.
2023 Jan 30
4
[PATCH libnbd v2 0/4] Pass LISTEN_FDNAMES with systemd socket activation
This is an alternative approach to https://listman.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2023-January/030535.html After discussing this with Dan Berrange we came to the conclusion that you really might want to set LISTEN_FDNAMES to arbitrary short strings (or not set it). Especially when talking to qemu-storage-daemon which would allow you to use these names on the command line. Rich.
2023 Jan 30
2
[PATCH libnbd v2 4/4] generator/states-connect-socket-activation.c: Set LISTEN_FDNAMES
When the user calls nbd_set_socket_activation_name before calling nbd_connect_system_socket_activation, pass the name down to the server through LISTEN_FDNAMES. This has no effect unless the new API has been called to set the socket name to a non-empty string. --- generator/states-connect-socket-activation.c | 35 +++++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git
2023 Jan 28
1
[PATCH libnbd] generator: Pass LISTEN_FDNAMES=nbd with systemd socket activation
systemd allows sockets passed through socket activation to be named with the protocol they require. We only ever pass one socket, name it. This environment variable is currently ignored by qemu-nbd and nbdkit, but might be used by qemu-storage-daemon: https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2023-01/msg06114.html --- generator/states-connect-socket-activation.c | 41
2023 Jan 31
1
[PATCH libnbd] generator: Pass LISTEN_FDNAMES=nbd with systemd socket activation
On 1/28/23 13:47, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > systemd allows sockets passed through socket activation to be named > with the protocol they require. We only ever pass one socket, name > it. This environment variable is currently ignored by qemu-nbd and > nbdkit, but might be used by qemu-storage-daemon: > > https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2023-01/msg06114.html
2023 Mar 23
1
[libnbd PATCH v3 18/19] generator: Add APIs to get/set the socket activation socket name
From: "Richard W.M. Jones" <rjones at redhat.com> To allow us to name the socket passed down to the NBD server when calling nbd_connect_systemd_socket_activation(3), we need to add the field to the handle and add access functions. [Laszlo's note: originally posted by Rich at <https://listman.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2023-January/030557.html>. I've renamed
2023 Mar 25
1
[libnbd PATCH v5 3/4] generator: Add APIs to get/set the socket activation socket name
From: "Richard W.M. Jones" <rjones at redhat.com> To allow us to name the socket passed down to the NBD server when calling nbd_connect_systemd_socket_activation(3), we need to add the field to the handle and add access functions. [Laszlo's notes: - Originally posted by Rich at <https://listman.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2023-January/030557.html> (Message-Id:
2023 Mar 28
1
[libnbd PATCH v5 3/4] generator: Add APIs to get/set the socket activation socket name
On Sat, Mar 25, 2023 at 12:39:28PM +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > From: "Richard W.M. Jones" <rjones at redhat.com> > > To allow us to name the socket passed down to the NBD server when > calling nbd_connect_systemd_socket_activation(3), we need to add the > field to the handle and add access functions. > > [Laszlo's notes: > > - Originally posted by
2023 Mar 28
1
[libnbd PATCH v5 3/4] generator: Add APIs to get/set the socket activation socket name
On 3/28/23 04:06, Eric Blake wrote: > On Sat, Mar 25, 2023 at 12:39:28PM +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote: >> From: "Richard W.M. Jones" <rjones at redhat.com> >> >> To allow us to name the socket passed down to the NBD server when >> calling nbd_connect_systemd_socket_activation(3), we need to add the >> field to the handle and add access functions.
2023 Jan 31
1
[PATCH libnbd] generator: Pass LISTEN_FDNAMES=nbd with systemd socket activation
On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 01:49:53PM +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > On 1/28/23 13:47, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > systemd allows sockets passed through socket activation to be named > > with the protocol they require. We only ever pass one socket, name > > it. This environment variable is currently ignored by qemu-nbd and > > nbdkit, but might be used by
2010 Mar 30
2
Create a new variable
Dear R-list, Sorry for spamming the list lately, I am just learning the more advanced aspects of R! I have some data that looks like this: Out Country1 Country 2 Country 3 ... CountryN 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 I want to create a new variable that counts the number of zeros in every row whenever Out is equal to 1, and else it is a zero, so it would look like this: new_var 0 0 2 I
2010 Oct 04
3
take input and store in variable
I am using a context to change values in a DB. Currently in my context, I am passing it to exten => s,1,WaitExten(7) ; 7 seconds to input exten => s,n,Set(NEW_VAR=${EXTEN}) ;Here is my problem. This is the only way I know how to 'grab' user input, which was normally from ${EXTEN} but I realize this won't work for extension 's'...... The short google search I did
2020 Apr 08
2
[PATCH nbdkit v3] tmpdisk: Generalize the tmpdisk plugin.
v2 was here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2020-April/msg00075.html In v3: - Add [VAR=VALUE ...] to manual. - Various minor improvements to the manual. - Work (at least, in theory - not tested) with block devices or symlinks. I didn't document this because it's hard to ensure these files or block devices would be cleaned up, so here be dragons. - Remove O_NOCTTY. -
2019 Nov 15
1
Re: [PATCH libnbd v2 2/2] api: Implement local command with systemd socket activation.
On 10/1/19 9:11 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Tue, Oct 01, 2019 at 08:24:33AM -0500, Eric Blake wrote: >>> +#else /* !HAVE_EXECVPE */ >>> + SET_NEXT_STATE (%.DEAD) >>> + set_error (ENOTSUP, "platform does not support socket activation"); >>> + return 0; >>> +#endif >> >> We probably ought to add a matching
2013 Jan 24
2
[LLVMdev] llvm alloca dependencies
> I tried methods related to point 1) suggested by you, > but I still have problems of finding dependencies. > What exactly I want to do: > > I have a chain like : Alloca -> Load(1) -> ... -> Computation > where the variable might be changed -> Store(new_var) -> ... -> Load(n) Your example is not very clear. I don't understand what's involved in the
2017 Sep 08
1
nested loop
i have a vector containing values ranging from 0 to 24 i want to create another variable which can categorize those values like this please help me with an R code Thanks *Value New_Var*1 0 -5 3 0 -5 5 0 -5 9 6-10 7 6-10 5 6-10 4 0-5 11 11-15 12 11-15 18 16-20 23 21 -25 --
2023 Mar 28
1
libnbd | Failed pipeline for master | 2db30279
Pipeline #819889104 has failed! Project: libnbd ( https://gitlab.com/nbdkit/libnbd ) Branch: master ( https://gitlab.com/nbdkit/libnbd/-/commits/master ) Commit: 2db30279 ( https://gitlab.com/nbdkit/libnbd/-/commit/2db30279bad4f9923baa541008f5da11624d2d1f ) Commit Message: socket activation: set LISTEN_FDNAMES Add LIST... Commit Author: Laszlo Ersek ( https://gitlab.com/lersek ) Pipeline