Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "dhcpd errors"
2009 Dec 31
3
[OT] CAT5 IP-capable rackmount KVM units?
Rather off-topic, but I'm looking for IP-based KVMs (~16 ports) that can
handle both PS/2 and USB hookups on the server side. All of the answers
over at Slashdot are a few years out of date and it looks like prices on
KVM head units have dropped a bit over the years.
Some of the older units only worked with Windows, Internet Explorer and
ActiveX. Others like the ATEN KH1516i supposedly
2007 Dec 19
3
median of binned values
Dear list,
I have a vector (array, table row, whatever is best) of frequency values
for categories (or bins), and I need to find the median category.
Trivial to do by hand, but I was wondering if there is a means to do it
in R in an elegant way.
The obvious medioan(vector) returns the median frequency for the binns,
and that is not what I want. i.e,:
freq
cat1 1
cat2 10
2011 Jan 17
2
matrix manipulations
Hi,
I am having some difficulties with matrix operations. It is a little hard to explain it so please bear with me. I have a very large data set, large enough that it needs to be split in parts in order to deal with. I can work things on these "parts" but the problem lies in adding together these parts for the final answer.
So that been said, let's say that i split the data in 2
2006 Apr 24
1
Re: Shielding of T1/E1 cables WAS RE: PinoutsforT1/E1 crossover
> Close. 10/100mbps Ethernet uses wires 1,2,3,6 but that is pair 2 & 3.
> Pair
> one is the pair up the dead center (pins 4&5), pair 2 is pins 1&2,
pair 3
> is
> 3&6 and pair 4 is 7&8. A T1 uses pairs 1&2, which is why you can't
use a
> regular crossover cable for a T1 crossover, but you can use a regular
> ethernet patch cable as a T1 patch
2005 Jul 21
2
cat 5 'joiner'? (polycom 500 problem)
What gives with the stupid stupid power system on the Polycom IP500 (I
hope they changed it on the 501's).
Anyway, does anyone know if you can get some type of joiner to connect
two Cat5 cables together, and will this affect the call/signal quality
because my Ethernet cable is longer than the dumb 11ft polycom supply
(oh and their manual is the wrong about which end goes into the handset
2005 Mar 14
4
E1/T1 back to back ??
Hi there
Just a quick question, I will be building some servers in a lab utilizing
Digium E1 cards. I would like if possible to avoid the expense of installing
an e1/ISDN30 in my lab. I have two questions really, first does anybody know
of an effective simulation tool I can use to replicate a real world PRI but
without the telco line being installed. And secondly, can I have a scenario
with 2
2004 Dec 20
3
Bug#286532: dnsmasq: misses message for DHCPINFORM due to 283331 fix
Package: logcheck-database
Version: 1.2.32
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
The fix for 283331 exposed a bug in the dnsmasq rules. The rule was
looking for DHCPINFO, but the actual message is DHCPINFORM. Prior to
the 283331 fix, the old rule worked, because the "[()[:alnum:]]+" part
of the rule matched the "RM" at the end of DHCPINFORM.
-- System Information:
Debian Release:
2006 May 30
2
Bug#369603: logcheck-database: new rule for dhcpd
Package: logcheck-database
Version: 1.2.44
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
Hi,
This patch changes one rule for dhcpd. It adds support for log lines of the following format:
May 30 19:36:57 server dhcpd: DHCPACK to 10.10.10.10 (aa:bb:cc:dd:ee:ff) via eth1
Regards,
Robbert
--- /root/dhcp 2006-05-30 21:50:24.000000000 +0200
+++ dhcp 2006-05-30 23:27:06.000000000 +0200
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@
2010 Oct 23
2
B410P - BRI NT 100 Ohm terminator
Hi,
My set up is :
Asterisk with B410P in NT mode <-------------cat5 straight cable
----------------> Another PBX in TE mode
Is the 100 Ohm terminator you can find on B410P boards, necessary when
connecting in NT mode to another PBX (set in TE mode) ?
Cheers
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
2008 May 15
1
Bug#471936: setting package to logcheck-database logtail logcheck, tagging 473619, tagging 478334, tagging 472368 ...
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.27
#
# logcheck (1.2.64) unstable; urgency=low
#
# * ignore.d.server/dhcp
# - Adding dhcp rules for DNS updates by ddns_remove_a()
# (closes: #459875, #472368)
# - Added dhcp "removed reverse map" rule, which occurs on DHCPRELEASE.
# * ignore.d.server/spamd
# - deal with socket connections by e.g. evolution
2006 Apr 22
4
Pinouts for T1/E1 crossover cable WAS "RE: what cable to connect a legacy PBX to a TE410P ?"
Can't anyone stop self-promotion and tell the poor guy what he needs.
A T1/E1 X-over cable using an RJ-45 (8-cond.) is pinned out as follows:
1 - 4
2 - 5
3 - NU
4 - 1
5 - 2
6 - NU
7 - NU
8 - NU
NU = Not Used
I have not in my experience seen any problems with using a Good Quality
Cat5 vs. Cat 3 (telco standard) cable for X-connects. YMMV, but you
should be fine. As far as the shielding
2006 Feb 26
5
Voice Over WiFi
Hello all,
this is not really an * question but it is somehow related, i am trying to
develop a working proposal for cheap and quick telephony services using Voip
running over *. By running a wireless network (over 802.11 a/b/g devices),
i plan to be able to reach customers directly with eithe table top or
handheld 802.11 sip enabled phones.
But the disadvantage is that how do i power each radio
2005 Mar 08
1
7960 Dies when network cable connected
Hey All,
I have a user whose Cisco 7960 died the other day. When you disconnect the
Ethernet cable the phone boots (as far as it can w/o network connectivity)
but as soon as you plug in the CAT5 it goes dead. (no lights, no sound, no
display, nothing)
I tried to contact Cisco but they say I have to contact the vendor. I have
sent an email to the vendor (www.thevoipconnection.com) and I am
2009 Apr 06
2
25-50-100fxs
Any hardware that can do 25-50-100 fxs ports trunked to sip ?
Example one end a cat5 other end 50 RJ11's jacks..
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20090406/9514bc47/attachment.htm
2011 Feb 23
8
security cameras
I heard about some inexpensive security cameras which get their power
through the same cat5 cable which delivers the data/pictures (which
would simplify wiring tremendously). Does anyone know about these? Do
they work with Linux, particularly CentOS?
tnx 4 tips.
2005 Jan 18
2
Router Recommendations Please
Hello all,
We've discovered that VoIP (IAX2) + Citrix + Video is pegging the measly
CPU on the Netopia router our ISP provided. We've got 3Mb/3Mb and will
increase to 4/4 next year.
The Netopia simply breaks out our WAN IPs, and we've got a switch hooked up
to it on the inside (Actually I've got a QoS box in-between).
-------------
| Internet |
| on Cat5 |
-------------
2006 Oct 17
3
Cluster Help
Hi All,
Need some information on getting the right storage array to buy for my
cluster configuration can anyone help me with this
my Setup so far
2 Athlon 2800 Sempron System
1 Wti Network power switch
1 24 Port 10/100 Cat5 switch
2 Adaptec 39160 scsi host adapter pci cards installed in the systems.
I need to know what is the best storage solution with this configuration
Thanks
2005 Jul 12
2
Polycom 600 phone
>From their website, the key difference between the polycom 500 and 600 phones is the number of "lines" they support. What does this mean in terms of asterisk? Do I have to have a seperate extension for each of these lines or ?
Also, slightly off-topic, how does the 500 POE "optional" cable work? Is this similar to have a power box on your desk, or is just a differently
2006 Oct 15
2
SPA942 quality for a Bank
Before committing to about 50 of the spa942's, I like to take a last
poll from those on the list to identify any negative issues that might
be associated with the audio, functionality, early failures, etc, on the
spa942.
Expecting to deploy these using existing cat5 cabling and both rj45
jacks. Been using three of theme in a short term demo with the customer,
but the demo systems has
2006 Apr 22
1
Pinouts for T1/E1 crossover cable WAS "RE: whatcable to connect a legacy PBX to a TE410P ?"
The "telco guys" probably did something non-industry standard and reversed send and receive in the jack that they plugged the CAT5 into. Sure it works, sure it is easier, sure it is not the correct way of doing things.
Thanks,
Steve
________________________________
From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com on behalf of Lacy Moore - Aspendora
Sent: Sat 4/22/2006 2:55 PM
To: Paul