similar to: mit-krb5 and heimdal binaries

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "mit-krb5 and heimdal binaries"

2015 May 12
1
4.2.1 make quicktest error
Greetings - On a RHEL6 system, Samba 4.2.1 compiles without any apparent problems but 'make quicktest' reports an error: FAILED (1 failures, 0 errors and 0 unexpected successes in 1 testsuites) A summary with detailed information can be found in: ./st/summary test: running (/usr/bin/perl /var/tmp/samba-4.2.1/selftest/selftest.pl --target=samba --prefix=./st
2023 Mar 19
1
mit-krb5 and heimdal binaries
On Sun, 2023-03-19 at 09:29 +0200, Alexander Bokovoy via samba- technical wrote: > Hi, > > > I would be against a blended build against both MIT Kerberos and > Heimdal > Kerberos in a distribution. It is not going to bring you anything > good, > support wise. > > Andreas and I have submitted a talk to SambaXP about MIT > Kerberos/Heimdal Kerberos-based Samba AD
2016 Dec 04
2
Change Password from Windows Native Interface
On Mon, 05 Dec 2016 07:50:23 +1300 Andrew Bartlett <abartlet at samba.org> wrote: > On Sun, 2016-12-04 at 11:43 +0000, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > On Sun, 4 Dec 2016 12:11:17 +0100 > > Marc Muehlfeld via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi Scott, > > > > > > Am 02.12.2016 um 06:55 schrieb Scott
2010 Nov 09
1
make quicktest failed
I had 444 errors I didn't want to put them all up here. Maybe I missed a step, maybe it's an easy "oops you forgot to do this" I'm on ubuntu 10.10 amd64 server completely uptodate today. I followed the http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba4/HOWTO My git is also today. == samba4.rpc.echo on ncacn_ip_tcp with validate and --option=socket:testnonblock=True
2017 Jan 29
3
classic upgrade fails with 4.6-test
On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 4:54 PM, Rowland Penny <rpenny at samba.org> wrote: > When you built Samba, did you use the '--with-ntvfs-fileserver' or > '--enable-selftest' options with configure ? > I used '--without-ntvfs-fileserver'.
2013 Dec 08
1
Question about Kerberos and what is the different if compile with internal heimdal or mit-krb5
Dear All, Would like some know the answer on the above question. What is the different between compiling using internal heimdal library vs mit-krb5. I'm on gentoo and thus like other distro having issue on the system-wide mit-krb and removing it is not that convenient (But still possible) I've try to compile samba 4.1.2 with internal heimdal library to work as a Domain controller But
2019 Nov 14
2
Filesystem does not support posix ACLs
Thanks a lot for the reference how to make the regtest. One last question please, if understand this correctly, the --use-ntvfs isnot available by default when installing the Debian package, so I need to compile samba with --with-ntvfs-fileserver to make the option available? On 11/14/19 8:52 AM, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > On Thu, 2019-11-14 at 07:30 +0000, Ghassan Elrayah wrote: >> Hi,
2017 Jan 30
2
classic upgrade fails with 4.6-test
On Mon, 2017-01-30 at 08:42 +0000, Rowland Penny wrote: > On Mon, 30 Jan 2017 15:44:15 +1300 > Andrew Bartlett <abartlet at samba.org> wrote: > > > On Sun, 2017-01-29 at 22:43 +0000, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > > On Sun, 29 Jan 2017 17:07:39 -0500 > > > Sonic <sonicsmith at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Sun, Jan 29,
2017 Jan 30
4
classic upgrade fails with 4.6-test
On Sun, 2017-01-29 at 22:43 +0000, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Sun, 29 Jan 2017 17:07:39 -0500 > Sonic <sonicsmith at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 4:54 PM, Rowland Penny <rpenny at samba.org> > > wrote: > > > > > When you built Samba, did you use the '--with-ntvfs-fileserver' > > > or > > >
2023 Mar 19
2
mit-krb5 and heimdal binaries
Hi! I already asked a similar question before, but it keeps popping up in different contexts and forms, and the more I use samba myself, the more often it comes to me too, especially in context of using various security tokens for auth. And the more I think about all this, the more sane it looks to me. The thing is: mit-krb5 has much better user-level support than heimdal. But samba does not
2020 Nov 01
0
4.13.1 make test failed
Hello I try today to install samba 4.13.1 ? ./configure run without error Make run without error Make Check Failed Debian 10.6 Also all required Packages are installed -- # cat summary = Failed tests = == samba4.blackbox.demote-saveddb == command: PYTHON=python3 /usr/src/samba-4.13.1/testprogs/blackbox/demote-saveddb.sh $PREFIX_ABS/demote
2019 Nov 15
1
Filesystem does not support posix ACLs
Hi again, it seems that the configure option (--with-ntvfs-fileserer, --enable-developer) are not available on samba-4.11.2. I get the following error: + --enable-developer --with-ntvfs-fileserver --sysconfdir=/etc/samba/ --mandir=/usr/share/man/ --sbindir=/usr/sbin/ --bindir=/usr/bin/ --without-systemd --with-statedir=/var/lib/samba --with-cachedir=/var/cache/samba
2010 Sep 02
1
Strange provisioning error - I really expect an answer
Hello All, I'm trying to contribute with my tests and continuous attempts to install and stress-test samba, but it gets really sad and frustrating finding out that no one answers. I know a lot of "we do this for free", "we do this in our free time", "wait longer for an answer" and that will come, save some typing and please, do not reply with that. I've
2019 Apr 01
3
selftest
Hi all, I just downloaded a fresh samba-4.10.0 tarball to verify the result of 'make test' What I did is: ./configure --enable-selftest make make test All run as the ordinary user. I encountered a build problem with 'make' in source4/lib/messaging/messaging_handlers.c due to the following conditional being placed /before/ #include "includes.h" #if defined(DEVELOPER)
2016 Dec 05
0
ntvfs file server and selftest background
On Sun, 2016-12-04 at 19:05 +0000, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Mon, 05 Dec 2016 07:50:23 +1300 > Andrew Bartlett <abartlet at samba.org> wrote: > > > > > On Sun, 2016-12-04 at 11:43 +0000, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > > > > > On Sun, 4 Dec 2016 12:11:17 +0100 > > > Marc Muehlfeld via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>
2018 Sep 13
3
lmdb requirement for AD DC
On Thu, 2018-09-13 at 14:41 +0100, miguel medalha via samba wrote: > Hello > > In one of my DCs, when I run ./configure for Samba 4.9.0, it fails > with the following message: > > Checking for lmdb >= 0.9.16 via header check : not > found > Samba AD DC and --enable-selftest requires lmdb 0.9.16 or later > > My ./configure command line does not contain the
2016 Dec 04
2
Change Password from Windows Native Interface
On Sun, 4 Dec 2016 12:11:17 +0100 Marc Muehlfeld via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi Scott, > > Am 02.12.2016 um 06:55 schrieb Scott Mattan via samba: > > I am currently trying to get a Samba 4.5.1 environment set up for > > testing and I am unable to get samba to request a new password from > > a windows user. The error that I get, is in Japanese,
2019 Apr 06
2
selftest, help with a single test
In the hope for some help, I would like some hint on how to diagnose the following single subunit: samba3.blackbox.smbclient_machine_auth.plain In particular the single test samba3.blackbox.smbclient_machine_auth.plain (s4member:local)(s4member:local) Results attached, run is from git at 'origin/v4-10-stable' Thanks in advance (This is because in my full selftest almost all failures
2011 Aug 03
1
Samba4 on CentOS6 make quicktest failed
Hello all I followed samba4 how to ( CentOS6 minimum install ) #working fro me ./configure.developer make #failed for me [root at dcmsc samba-4.0.0alpha16]# make quicktest WAF_MAKE=1 ./buildtools/bin/waf test --quick 'test' finished successfully (0.000s) Waf: Entering directory `/root/download/samba-4.0.0alpha16/bin' [ 111/3389] Generating VERSION Waf: Leaving directory
2019 Nov 14
3
Filesystem does not support posix ACLs
Hi, I am trying to get some integration tests running in CI with a software uses samba4 AD for authentication. So basically I would like spin up a build and provision a samba4 AD with some test users and groups non-interactively and test commits and pull requests against the AD. On 11/14/19 8:16 AM, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > On Thu, 2019-11-14 at 06:19 +0000, Ghassan Elrayah via samba wrote: