similar to: Making headers self-contained for static analysis

People have let me know that the attachment didn't make it through. Do patches get filtered out? Please find it there: https://github.com/lionel-/r-svn/commit/e3de56798b1321a3fa8688a42bbb73d763b78024.patch I'm also happy to post it on the bugzilla if that makes sense. Best, Lionel On 3/16/23, Lionel Henry <lionel at posit.co> wrote: > Hello, > > I started using clangd to

I tried running all the commands in the compile_commands.json (thanks for pointing that out), but it runs into the same "No such file or directory: *.inc". I don't see those files built anywhere in that list. Does it take tblgen into account? Doug On Thu, Aug 16, 2018, 1:02 PM Sanjoy Das <sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com> wrote: > TensorFlow uses bazel to build LLVM:

>>>>> Lionel Henry <lionel at rstudio.com> >>>>> on Fri, 1 Sep 2017 13:47:07 +0200 writes: > A package should probably never register a S3 method unless it owns > either the generic or the class. I agree... (and typically it does "own" the class) > Here `formula.tools` owns neither. i.e., it neither defines as.character()

Hi, Recently I've done some experiments on the LLVM/Clang code and discovered that many of our source files often include unnecessary header files. I wrote a simple tool that eliminates redundant includes and estimates benefits of doing it, and the results were quite nice: for some files we were able to save 90% of compile time! I think we want to apply some of the cleanups I found, but

On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 11:30 AM, George Karpenkov <ekarpenkov at apple.com> wrote: > > On Jul 12, 2017, at 11:01 AM, Kostya Serebryany <kcc at google.com> wrote: > One question: will it make sense to *copy* the code to the new location, > work on it, then delete the code from the old location, > instead of doing a move in a single commit? > I don't expect any

It's also likely that a lot of '#include "foo.h"' can be replaced with 'class foo;' Especially in the transitive inclusion case, instead of removing the #include entirely. On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 8:38 AM, Chris Lattner via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > I, for one, want faster builds. > > Beyond that though, this seems like obvious

On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 11:47:42PM +0300, Manuel Wolfshant wrote: > On 9/25/20 1:36 PM, Lionel Élie Mamane wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 06:51:23PM +0300, Manuel Wolfshant wrote: >>> On 9/21/20 9:47 PM, Lionel Élie Mamane wrote: >>> We have a HP R/T 3000 G4 UPS; according to the data returned by >>> the usbhid-ups driver, it seems to be a "badge

Dear R-devel, I found this behavior disturbing, if `1 + f()` is called, `sys.call()` called inside of `f` will return a quoted `f()` with a "srcref" that prints "1 + f()". I don't know which one is good but I don't think they can be correct at the same time. Here's a reproducible example: f <- function(){ sc <- sys.call() print(sc) attr(sc,

> On 26 Jun 2019, at 17:25, Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com> wrote: > > R-Forge is mirrored on Github; see https://github.com/rforge/ecdat, for example. That shows 418 commits in its history; presumably that's the full R-forge history. I think that's newer than Michael Friendly's gist. > > So I suspect (but haven't tried to do this) that

On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 7:02 PM, George Karpenkov <ekarpenkov at apple.com> wrote: > I’ve submitted a WIP PR: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35288 > Thanks for working in this! One question: will it make sense to *copy* the code to the new location, work on it, then delete the code from the old location, instead of doing a move in a single commit? I don't expect any dramatic changes

Hi Folks, Good evening, I used the code which i print below, Yes i got the result , but i need the result like this "TruncateHtml is jus....(continued)" some_html = ''<ul><li><a href="http://whatever">TruncateHtml is just like the vanilla truncate rails helper , TruncateHtml is just like the vanilla truncate rails

Hi everybody, I''m starting a new 3.2 project and i need to know the best hosting offers THanks for your help -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rubyonrails-talk/-/eCOQw_HiChwJ. To post to this group, send email to

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=490 netfilter@linuxace.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |netfilter@linuxace.com Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

> To find which header files could be removed it scanned the file for "#include" lines and tried to remove them one by one (checking if the file still compiles after the removal). When there were no more include lines to remove, we verified the change with ninja+ninja check. It looks like this makes us rely heavily on transitive header includes -- is that right? Specifically what I

Lionel, Thanks for your response. I understand that method overriding can be a serious issue, but as you say, this is not something that the user can act upon. Yet the message lands at the user?s feet. In my case, the messages are cluttering my package vignettes, and may or may not represent what users see if they themselves run the vignette code, depending on what version of ggplot2, etc. they

????? Thanks to Duncan, Lionel and Henrik for their quick replies. I have further questions: ??? ?? ???? 1.? Will GitHub automatically transfer the commits I made to R-Forge in the past couple of days?? R-Forge is now at Rev. 420, and GitHub is still at 418.? Will 419 and 420 be automatically mirrored onto "https://github.com/rforge/ecdat" sometime in the next 24 hours or so?? Is

????? Thanks.? I'm still having problems: ??? ??????? 1.? I went to "github.com" and logged in with my standard GitHub account ??? ??????? 2.? Then I clicked "+" in the upper right, just left of my GitHub ID icon, and selected "Import a repository", as Lionel suggested. ??? ??????? 3.? " Your old repository?s clone URL" =

>>>>> G?bor Cs?rdi >>>>> on Thu, 26 Dec 2019 08:23:10 +0000 writes: > Hi Frederick, I know some non R-core people use this > workflow to keep local patches in git branches: > https://bookdown.org/lionel/contributing/ > Best, Gabor Thank you, Gabor, and notably, Lionel, for providing the extras. As Frederik notes / ask as well about

On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 11:54 AM, George Karpenkov <ekarpenkov at apple.com> wrote: > > On Jul 12, 2017, at 11:34 AM, Kostya Serebryany <kcc at google.com> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 11:30 AM, George Karpenkov <ekarpenkov at apple.com> > wrote: > >> >> On Jul 12, 2017, at 11:01 AM, Kostya Serebryany <kcc at google.com> wrote:

On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 06:51:23PM +0300, Manuel Wolfshant wrote: > On 9/21/20 9:47 PM, Lionel Élie Mamane wrote: >> We have a HP R/T 3000 G4 UPS; according to the data returned by the >> usbhid-ups driver, it seems to be a "badge engineered" Eaton 5PX >> UPS LI R 3000. >> We have a stubborn "Replace Battery" alarm that stays (...): >> The