similar to: zpool list No known data errors

Hi all, I''m trying to delete a zpool and when I do, I get this error: # zpool destroy oradata_fs1 cannot open ''oradata_fs1'': I/O error # The pools I have on this box look like this: #zpool list NAME SIZE USED AVAIL CAP HEALTH ALTROOT oradata_fs1 532G 119K 532G 0% DEGRADED - rpool 136G 28.6G 107G 21% ONLINE - # Why

Hi, We are seeing more long delays in zpool import, say, 4~5 or even 25~30 minutes, especially when backup jobs are going on in the FC SAN the LUNs resides (no iSCSI LUNs yet). On the same node for the LUNs of the same array, some pools takes a few seconds, but minutes for some. the pattern seems random to me so far. It''s first noticed soon after being upgraded to Solaris 10 U6

in Solaris 10 U4, type: -bash-3.00# zpool create -R filepool mirror /export/home/f1.dat /export/home/f2.dat invalid alternate root ''Segmentation Fault (core dumped) -- This messages posted from opensolaris.org

Hi, LUN is connected to solaris 10u9 from NETAP FAS2020a with ISCSI. I''m changing LUN size on netapp and solaris format see new value but zpool still have old value. I tryed zpool export and zpool import but it didn''t resolve my problem. bash-3.00# format Searching for disks...done AVAILABLE DISK SELECTIONS: 0. c0d1 <DEFAULT cyl 6523 alt 2 hd 255 sec 63>

Hi List, As a ZFS newbie, I foolishly copied my data set to the root zpool file system (a large iSCSI SAN array). Thus: # zpool create -f iscsi c4t19d0 c4t20d0 c4t21d0 c4t22d0 c4t23d0 c4t24d0 # zpool list NAME SIZE USED AVAIL CAP HEALTH ALTROOT iscsi 9.53T 64.5K 5.34T 0% ONLINE - # zfs set mountpoint=/mydisks/iscsi iscsi Then copied

Hi, OS : Solaris 10 11/06 zpool list doesn''t reflect pool usage stats instantly. Why? # ls -l total 209769330 -rw------T 1 root root 107374182400 Apr 30 14:28 deleteme # zpool list NAME SIZE USED AVAIL CAP HEALTH ALTROOT wo 136G 100G 36.0G 73% ONLINE - # rm deleteme # zpool list NAME SIZE

# zpool list NAME SIZE USED AVAIL CAP HEALTH ALTROOT jira-app-zpool 272G 330K 272G 0% ONLINE - The following command hangs forever. If I reboot the box , zpool list shows online as I mentioned the output above. # zpool destroy -f jira-app-zpool How can get rid of this pool and any reference to it. bash-3.00# zpool status pool: jira-app-zpool state: UNAVAIL

I noted this PSARC thread with interest: Re: zpool autoexpand property [PSARC/2008/353 Self Review] because it so happens that during a recent disk upgrade, on a laptop. I''ve migrated a zpool off of one partition onto a slightly larger one, and I''d like to somehow tell zfs to grow the zpool to fill the new partition. So, what''s the best way to do this? (and is it

I''m seeing odd behaviour when I create a ZFS raidz pool using three disks. The output of "zpool status" shows the pool size as the size of the three disks combined (as if it were a Raid 0 volume). This isn''t expected behaviour is it? When I create a mirrored volume in ZFS everything is as one would expect the pool is the size of a single drive. My setup: Compaq

http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=871 Summary: ''zpool key -l'' core dumped with keysource=hex,prompt and unmatched entered in Classification: Development Product: zfs-crypto Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Severity: minor

Hi everyone, I have just installed Solaris and have added a 3x500GB raidz drive array. I am able to use this pool (''tank'') successfully locally, but when I try to share it remotely, I can only read, I cannot execute or write. I didn''t do anything other than the default ''zfs set sharenfs=on tank''... how can I get it so that any allowed user can access

Hi, Created a zpool with 64k recordsize and enabled dedupe on it. zpool create -O recordsize=64k TestPool device1 zfs set dedup=on TestPool I copied files onto this pool over nfs from a windows client. Here is the output of zpool list Prompt:~# zpool list NAME SIZE ALLOC FREE CAP DEDUP HEALTH ALTROOT TestPool 696G 19.1G 677G 2% 1.13x ONLINE - When I ran a

I recently created a raidz of four 2TB-disks and moved a bunch of movies onto them. And then I noticed that I''ve somehow lost a full TB of space. Why? nebol at filez:/$ zfs list tank2 NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT tank2 3.12T 902G 32.9K /tank2 nebol at filez:/$ zpool list tank2 NAME SIZE USED AVAIL CAP HEALTH ALTROOT tank2 5.44T 4.18T 1.26T 76% ONLINE -

Not sure what the best list to send this to is right now, so I have selected a few, apologies in advance. A couple questions. First I have a physical host (call him bob) that was just installed with b134 a few days ago. I upgraded to b145 using the instructions on the Illumos wiki yesterday. The pool has been upgraded (27) and the zfs file systems have been upgraded (5). chris at bob:~# zpool

I''m just uploading all my data to my server and the space used is much more than what i''m uploading; Documents = 147MB Videos = 11G Software= 1.4G By my calculations, that equals 12.547T, yet zpool list is showing 21G as being allocated; NAME SIZE ALLOC FREE CAP DEDUP HEALTH ALTROOT dpool 27.2T 21.2G 27.2T 0% 1.00x ONLINE - It doesn''t look like

i''ve got a little zpool with a naughty raidz vdev that won''t take a replacement that as far as i can tell should be adequate. a history: this could well be some bizarro edge case, as the pool doesn''t have the cleanest lineage. initial creation happened on NexentaCP inside vmware in linux. i had given the virtual machine raw device access to 4 500gb drives and 1 ~200gb

Hello, Anyone else noticed that zpool is kind of negative when reporting back from some error conditions? Like: cannot import ''zpool01'': I/O error Destroy and re-create the pool from a backup source. or even worse: cannot import ''rpool'': pool already exists Destroy and re-create the pool from a backup source. The first one i

Hi, My swap is on raidz1. Df -k and swap -l are showing almost no usage of swap, while zfs list and zpool list are showing me 96% capacity. Which should i believe? Justin # df -hk Filesystem size used avail capacity Mounted on /dev/dsk/c3t0d0s1 14G 4.0G 10G 28% / /devices 0K 0K 0K 0% /devices ctfs

amber ~ # zpool list data NAME SIZE ALLOC FREE CAP DEDUP HEALTH ALTROOT data 930G 295G 635G 31% 1.00x ONLINE - amber ~ # zfs send -RD data at prededup |zfs recv -d ezdata cannot receive new filesystem stream: destination ''ezdata'' exists must specify -F to overwrite it amber ~ # zfs send -RD data at prededup |zfs recv -d ezdata/data cannot receive:

Hi All, I had a slice with zfs file system which I want to mirror, I followed the procedure mentioned in the amin guide I am getting this error. Can you tell me what I did wrong? root # zpool list NAME SIZE USED AVAIL CAP HEALTH ALTROOT export 254G 230K 254G 0% ONLINE - root # echo |format Searching for disks...done