similar to: AD Functional Level vs very old SaMBa member server

Okay then, this sounds very bad :-( One more thing: There is a system using PAM SMB (https://www.samba.org/~airlied/) with lanman1 protocol on port 139. After upgrading our domain level, will we be able to keep some MEMBER servers, to which this PAM SMB remains to be able to authenticate via TCP/139 and some kind of NTLM (let's say NTLMv1) authentication, or even member servers will only

On 10/03/2023 14:18, Tam?s N?meth via samba wrote: > Okay then, this sounds very bad :-( One more thing: There is a system using > PAM SMB (https://www.samba.org/~airlied/) with lanman1 protocol on port > 139. After upgrading our domain level, will we be able to keep some MEMBER > servers, to which this PAM SMB remains to be able to authenticate via > TCP/139 and some kind of NTLM

On 10/03/2023 12:31, Tam?s N?meth via samba wrote: > Thank you for your help. I'm further analyzing the problem: I'm trying to > migrate to a brand new SaMBa server, but the deadlines are too tight, and > it's possible I won't be able to finish in time. So, preparing for this > worst case scenario: So you have had over 10 years to upgrade and now everything has to be

Well, thank you for still replying to me. The thing is that this particular SaMBa server is THE original Linux server of my working place, hosting tons of home made ancient perl and PHP programs written by former colleagues, and these programs interact with the dozens of SaMBa shares. This is why we never had the time to fully analyze its structure and upgrade it somehow while working on other

Will I really HAVE to use the idmap backends AD or RID? I was planning to use TDB2 with a script which I've already written: [root at fs3 samba]# ./idmap.sh IDTOSID UID 1301 SID:S-1-5-21-1632654815-303659134-1628659390-1950 [root at fs3 samba]# ./idmap.sh IDTOSID GID 198 SID:S-1-5-21-1632654815-303659134-1628659390-3247 [root at fs3 samba]# ./idmap.sh SIDTOID

Dear All, Thank you for your help (especially Rowland Penny), I finally managed to migrate our ancient ext3 based, ISO-8859-2 encoded SaMBa 3.2.5 with locally stored UIDs and GIDs to a UTF-8 encoded ex4 based server running SaMBa 4.16.4 with RID UID/GID backend. However, after two weeks of the migration I observed something horrible: Windows Word (or MS Office in general) somehow manages to

Hi, I was trying to get a graph in lattice with the following data frame (7 rows, 5 cols): chr start1 end1 meth positive 1 1 10 20 1.5 y 2 2 12 18 -0.7 n 3 3 22 34 2.0 y 4 1 35 70 3.0 y 5 1 120 140 -1.3 n 6 1 180 190 0.2 y 7 2 220 300 0.4 y I wanted the panels to be organized by 'chr' -

i''m missing something here. how would I code this outside the application to be shared with other Camping apps? module Blog::Controllers module AuthenticationHelper def self.included(base) class << base define_method :authenticate do |*a| a.each do |meth| if method_defined?(meth.to_s)

Interrogating some (of my own) code in another package. >norm.meth <- getMethod("normalize", "MatrixLike") >message("str(norm.meth)") >str(norm.meth) >message("show(norm.meth at .Data)") >show(norm.meth at .Data) Last show() displays this: function (object, ...) { .local <- function (object, method = c("median",

Here is a piece of code fitting a model to a (part) of a dataset, just for illustration. I can extract the random interaction and the residual variance in group meth==1 using VarCorr, but how do I get the other residual variance? Is there any way to get the other variances in numerical form directly - it seems a litte contraintuitive to use "as.numeric" when extracting estimates,

I'm attempting to reflect the information for use with corresponding fields in GUI (in a different package), to provide default values, argname as key for UI label lookups, etc. So I want something much more like the formals of the implementation: { "object", "method": c("median", "vs", "tukey"),

Hey. I have a very annoying problem, and was wondering what is wrong. Suppose I have backgroundrb running, and then I have an action in some controller. In the action I define a worker. When leaving the action, suddenly the connection to backgroundrb is lost: DRb URI: druby://localhost:22222 Pid: 3976 Autostart... done druby://localhost:42531 - #<Errno::EBADF: Bad file descriptor -

Hi all, While compiling R to RISC-V64 architecture and debugging in R's C source codes, I think I have found a small bug. Can anyone please verify whether it is a real bug? The possible bug lies in the file `R-4.2.2/src/library/stats/src/approx.c` in function `R_approxfun` around line 148: #ifdef DEBUG_approx REprintf("R_approxfun(x,y, nxy = %.0f, .., nout = %.0f, method = %d,

Take a look at the sources, hmac.h declares struct hmac_context: struct hmac_context { char ctx[HMAC_MAX_CONTEXT_SIZE]; char ctxo[HMAC_MAX_CONTEXT_SIZE]; const struct hash_method *hash; }; If compiled for a 32 bit virtual address space, this has an alignment requirement of 4 due to the hash pointer. In line 171 of auth-token.c, we have following

Hi Attached is a patch that adds aliases to the API for methods that look like attribute accessors. So a_frame.set_title(''The title'') # currently a_frame.title = ''The title'' # now an alternative textctrl.get_value # currently textctrl.value # now an alternative Also, C++ methods named ''IsXXX'' are now exposed in ruby with

Currently I have a registration form that is built like this: <label for="First name">First name</label> <%= text_field "user", "first_name" %><br> <label for="Last name">Last name</label> <%= text_field "user", "last_name" %><br> <label for="Email">Email</label>

I am getting the following error in my script. I am very very new to R and have obtained this script from another person. #read file in (dummy data) starburst.plot<-function(affy.fold, affy.FDR)(ifelse( ((affy.fold) >=0), -1*log10(affy.FDR), 1*log10(affy.FDR))) starburst.plot<-function(meth.fold, meth.FDR)(ifelse( ((meth.fold) >=0), -1*log10(meth.FDR), 1*log10(affy.FDR))) At my next

Hello, I experienced a strange behaviour of callNextMethod when used in either initialize or any other S4 function method definition. Help says callNextMethod calls the next inherited method for the current function from where it is called with the same actual (non missing) arguments. This is OK. The problem appears when some formal arguments (in particular, S4 objects) of this function are

Hello everyone and Timo in particular, about a year ago I implemented a SHA-1 variant of the HMAC(-MD5) present in Dovecot. I had always disliked this a bit, because it replicates a lot of code. This patch generalizes the HMAC function to take a hash_method struct as parameter, and changes existing code which uses the "old" HMAC function to use this new one. I'm not really sure

Hi, I have noticed that there is a change in the use of ellipses or . in R versions 2.6.1 and later. In versions 2.5.1 and earlier, the . were always at the end of the argument list, but in 2.6.1 they are placed after the main arguments and before method control arguments. This results in the user having to specify the exact (complete) names of the control arguments, i.e. partial matching is