similar to: Cannot share RW, "Permission Denied" with sharenfs in ZFS

Hi everyone, I have just installed Solaris and have added a 3x500GB raidz drive array. I am able to use this pool (''tank'') successfully locally, but when I try to share it remotely, I can only read, I cannot execute or write. I didn''t do anything other than the default ''zfs set sharenfs=on tank''... how can I get it so that any allowed user can access

-bash-3.2$ zfs share tank cannot share ''tank'': share(1M) failed -bash-3.2$ how do i figure out what''s wrong? This message posted from opensolaris.org

Hello, I''m sure there is a simple solution, but I am unable to figure this one out. Assuming I have tank/fs, tank/fs/fs1, tank/fs/fs2, and I set sharenfs=on for tank/fs (child filesystems are inheriting it as well), and I chown user:group /tank/fs, /tank/fs/fs1 and /tank/fs/fs2, I see: ls -la /tank/fs user:group . user:group fs1 user:group fs2 user:group some_other_file If I mount

I saw in another post that a best practices doc will be coming, but I figured I would try to get this working. I''m trying to understand why zfs uses so many "zfs create" so I can use it better. What makes sense is that each zfs fs can have it''s own options (compression, nfs, atime, quota, etc). I really love this because it is so tuneable -- compression on these

Hi, Is it expected that if I have filesystem tank/foo and tank/foo/bar (mounted under /tank) then in order to be able to browse via /net down into tank/foo/bar I need to have group/other permissions on /tank/foo open? # zfs create tank/foo # zfs create tank/foo/bar # chown gavinm /tank/foo /tank/foo/bar # zfs set sharenfs=rw tank/foo # ls -laR /tank/foo /tank/foo: total 9 drwxr-xr-x 3 gavinm

I''m new to zfs and opensolaris and so am not sure of the correct terminology for this question. I have a test machine running opensolaris 2008.11 (which I have been very impressed with so far). It has 1 disc for boot and 3 as a zpool (called tank, as per the majority of the examples ;)) This machine is a test "SAN" for use by a second test machine running vmware ESX (the free

I am trying to configure a system where I have two different NFS shares which point to the same directory. The idea is if you come in via one path, you will have read-only access and can''t delete any files, if you come in the 2nd path, then you will have read/write access. For example, create the read/write nfs share: zfs create tank/snapshots zfs set sharenfs=on tank/snapshots root

x86 snv 108 I have a pool with around 5300 file systems called home. I can do: zfs set sharenfs=on home however zfs set sharenfs="sec=krb5,rw" home complains: cannot set property for ''home'': ''sharenfs'' cannot be set to invalid options I feel I must be overlooking something elementary. Thanks, Alastair -------------- next part --------------

http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=971 Summary: zfs key -l fails after unloading (keyscope=dataset) Classification: Development Product: zfs-crypto Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: Solaris Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P2 Component: other AssignedTo:

I have Solaris 10 U7 that is exporting ZFS filesytem. The client is Solaris 9 U7. I can mount the filesytem just fine but I am unable to write to it. showmount -e shows my mount is set for everyone. the dfstab file has option rw set. So what gives? Phillip -- This message posted from opensolaris.org

I''ve got my first server deployment with ZFS. Consolidating a pair of other file servers that used to have a dozen or so NFS exports in /etc/dfs/dfstab similar to; /export/solaris/images /export/tools /export/ws ..... and so on.... For the new server, I have one large zfs pool; -bash-3.00# df -hl bigpool 16T 1.5T 15T 10% /export that I am starting to

I am still in the familiarisation and testing phase of my puppet implementation, and have a question for the enlightened: Is there an upper limit to the numeric user ID that puppet recognises? Here is what I have so far: System is RHEL4, puppet 0.23.1 All users are defined in LDAP rather than in /etc/password, and their numeric user IDs are sourced from LDAP as well. These numeric IDs

Hello all, We're having problems with files that suddenly stop being seen on the fuse clients. I couldn't yet find a way to reproduce this. It happens every once in a while. Sometimes you try to ls some file and it can't be found. When you run ls on the parent directory, it is shown on the output, and, after that, you can access it. I'm mentioning ls, but the problem also

Starting from this thread: http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=118786&#118786 I would love to have the possibility to set an ISCSI alias when doing an shareiscsi=on on ZFS. This will greatly facilate to identify where an IQN is hosted. the ISCSI alias is defined in rfc 3721 e.g. http://www.apps.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3721.html#sec-2 and the CLI could be something like: zfs set

Hi all, I have a pool called tank/home/foo and I want to rename it to tank/home/bar. What''s the best way to do this (the zfs and zpool man pages don''t have a "rename" option)? One way I can think of is to create a clone of tank/home/foo called tank/home/bar, and then destroy the former. Is that the best (or even only) way? TIA, -- Rich Teer, SCSA, SCNA, SCSECA,

I''m CCing zfs-discuss at opensolaris.org, as this doesn''t look like FreeBSD-specific problem. It looks there is a problem with block allocation(?) when we are near quota limit. tank/foo dataset has quota set to 10m: Without quota: FreeBSD: # dd if=/dev/zero of=/tank/test bs=512 count=20480 time: 0.7s Solaris: # dd if=/dev/zero of=/tank/test bs=512 count=20480 time: 4.5s

Hi, I have a mirror pool tank having two devices underneath. Created in this way #zpool create tank mirror c3t500507630E020CEAd1 c3t500507630E020CEAd0 Created file system tank/home #zfs create tank/home Created another file system tank/home #zfs create tank/home/sridhar After that I have created files and directories under tank/home and tank/home/sridhar. Now I detached 2nd device i.e

Hi, I tried again with some other options. After finding http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2013-November/093793.html I deleted every ACL from the directory Maildir and I also assigned the group "mail" to it, recursively: OmniOS-Xeon:/tank/home/olaf/Maildir/.Generiche $ ls -lV total 903 drwxrwxrwx 2 olaf mail 2 Sep 27 23:47 cur

Dear Helpful R Users, I am graphing some data using the beanplot, but I am having trouble getting the output I desire. I have five tanks (A-E) and 2 groups for each tank grp1 or grp2, except tank C where there is only grp1. (I only changed the grouprep to "C grp1" for the example) When I plot them, I would like A B C(only grp1 - half of the bean plot) then D and E (as full beans).

Dear all, I have tried to calculate a GLMM fit with lmer (lme4) and glmmPQL (MASS), I also used glm for comparison. I am getting very different results from different functions, and I suspect that the problem is with our dataset rather than the functions, but I would appreciate help in deciding whether my suspicions are right. If indeed we are attempting the wrong type of analysis, some