similar to: CIFS client mounts meta ops 30 times slow than server

On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 02:08:56AM +0800, Shenyue Chen wrote: > Thanks for the advice, Jeremy and Ralph. We'll definitely give the new > version a try,? > I guess I still need to clarify my comparison setting?a little bit: > Let's say the BeeGFS folder path on SMB server is /mnt/beegfs. > This folder is exported via Samba, and mounted on CIFS clients in /mnt/smb

Also from my observation, based on network packets and time measurements, it seems the CIFS clients haven't done any sort of cache. For example, doing a "ls" for 5 times on the same folder within a short period of time. The network packet sizes are almost equal every time and the time it takes is similar. Isn't there supposed to be some page cache or dentry cache that could

Hi Samba users, We would like to use samba for re-exporting our other distributed file system (BeeGFS). However, we found that the meta data operations are very slow (dir stat, removal etc.). On SMB client the performance is more than 30x slow than on the SMB server. We would expect some slowness but this is too big a drop. This is the result on CIFS client $ sudo mdtest -b 10 -I 10 -L -z 2

Using samba 3.2.1, when trying to mount cifs mounts at boot from in the /etc/fstab, I get the following error in my syslog: CIFS VFS: cifs_mount failed w/return code = -22 After enabling debugging from the /proc interface, I get this: fs/cifs/cifsfs.c: Devname: //skuld.tolharadys.net/greeneg flags: 0 fs/cifs/connect.c: CIFS VFS: in cifs_mount as Xid: 10 with uid: 0 fs/cifs/connect.c:

I recently moved from the fuse client to NFS - Now I'm seeing a bunch of this in syslog. Is this something to be concerned about, or is it 'normal' NFS behavior? NFS: server localhost error: fileid changed fsid 0:15: expected fileid 0xd88ba88a97875981, got 0x40e476ef5fdfbe9f I also see a lot of 'stale file handle' in nfs.log, but the timestamps don't correspond.

Hi Martin I just found the file, it's a config file that about 250 hosts read every half an hour so it makes sense this is getting some contention. However, the strange thing is, the share the file is in is a read-only share: [dist$] comment = Windows dist path = /path/to/share wide links = Yes browseable = Yes read only = Yes guest only = Yes

Hi David, On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 19:34:25 +0100, David C via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > I have a newly implemented two node CTDB cluster running on CentOS 7, Samba > 4.7.1 > > The node network is a direct 1Gb link > > Storage is Cephfs > > ctdb status is OK > > It seems to be running well so far but I'm frequently seeing the following >

On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 09:03:41AM -0800, Jeremy Allison via samba wrote: > > Check out the latest cifsfs code. I think Steve > and Aurelian and Ronnie added an ioctl for this. > > I'm here at Vault in Boston with Steve, I'll ask > him :-). Steve says there are two utilities in Linux, getcifsacl and setcifsacl that use a custom ioctl inside the Linux cifsfs kernel

Greetings, I am working on getting mount.cifs version: 1.11-3.2.4 on debian to mount a share on a samba server Version 3.0.13-1.1-SUSE on SuSe. This was working on older debian systems, but upon upgrading some of the systems to Lenny I am now having trouble mounting shares. Again, this was working and I have smbfs installed on the systems (which is what I used before). The samba server is set

Hi, everyone, I setup two-node samba cluster with ctdb and glusterfs. When one node fails, another node can takeover ip and cifs sessions, so application can not breaks. Linux cifs client works fine when disable one node. However, it does not work under windows xp. I am copying a big file to samba share, meanwhile I disable the connected node, then copy break with "The specified network

Hi, I just installed CIFS support on my machines and must say it works much better than smbfs. special characters alright, transfer speed doubled (from 2.8MB/s to 5.6MB/s on 100MBit). There's two issues tho I haven't been able to root out: -credentials file: tried username=<username> and password=<password> in /etc/credfile, tried user=<username> to match the

Dear reader, I tried to switch my server from samba 3.5 to 3.6. Unfortunately I was not successful. The smb.conf below works without any problems under 3.5 With 3.6.3 I get the following error: [2012/02/23 09:32:21.669389, 1] auth/server_info.c:391(samu_to_SamInfo3) The primary group domain sid(S-1-5-21-463168302-511420122-2937072671-513) does not match the domain

On Fri, 5 Aug 2016 08:38:09 +0200 Adam Błaszczykowski <adam.blaszczykowski at gmail.com> wrote: > ok sorry for that, now should be ok :-D > > *smb.conf:* > [global] > workgroup = RES > netbios name = dsshp2 > vfs objects = acl_xattr shadow_copy2 fileid > fileid:mapping = fsid > encrypt passwords = yes > domain logons = no > log

Dear Jeremy, thanks for your instant reply. :-) Along with Linux native getfacl/fetfacl, I also tested getcifsacl/setcifsacl (for sure thoroughly ;-)). Unfortunately, these CIFS client tools seem to have been designed as part of the "old" CIFS Unix Extensions, working only for SMB/CIFS mounts, and are not supposed to work with SMB2/SMB3 mounts, as I guess. During my tests, the

How did you mount your cephfs filesystem? Am 18. September 2018 20:34:25 MESZ schrieb David C via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>: >Hi All > >I have a newly implemented two node CTDB cluster running on CentOS 7, >Samba >4.7.1 > >The node network is a direct 1Gb link > >Storage is Cephfs > >ctdb status is OK > >It seems to be running well so far but

Dear All, Anyone have any hints on bugs affecting samba 4.1.11 acting as a member server? I've some complain about Office 2013/365 They said that network share are not available and force to exit and documentation recovery are not possible. (But as I can see the network are still working fine...) The same configuration on samba 3.6.x are working without problem. Below are my configuration

On Friday 4th March 2005, Steven French said, in part: > I did some experiments and confirmed that for this "deep mapping" > (http://www.windowsnetworking.com/articles_tutorials/w2kdmap.html) mount of > a complex target ie \\server\share\dir > 1) the path component following the share name is not sent by windows (it > is sent by linux cifs and smbfs - and samba then

Hello everyone, We have a CentOS 6.3 NFSv4 server and client, and we've run into a situation where the client is unable to list "private" (chmod 700-ed) directories, even if the current user owns the directory in question. A bit more background: we're also using Samba 3.5+Winbind to provide authentication and UID/GID mapping against a Windows 2008 R2 domain controller.

Hi, I'm trying to mount a Samba share on Linux 2.6.10, using samba-3.0.7. The authentication is done using Kerberos V5, on a Windows server. The share is located on a Solaris server that uses samba-3.0.10. Authentication with Kerberos is functional (I can get a ticket using kinit(1)). The server requires client (packet?) signing. The admins in charge of the server refuse to make it

On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 02:59:18AM -0400, Felix Miata via samba wrote: > Items in dmesg when FAT share's are accessed from web browser: > CIFS VFS: bogus file nlink value 0 nlink should never be zero. If an SMB server returns that, then the CIFSFS client will have to fake it to 1 at least. > When accessed from FC/L (OFM (orthodox filemanager)): > CIFS VFS: illegal date, month 0