Displaying 20 results from an estimated 700 matches similar to: "Missing mailboxes after migration from Maildir -> mdbox"
2013 Sep 25
1
Thunderbird 24.0 for Windows seems to ignore Samba4.0.9 permissions settings
Hi,
I have a CentOS 6.4 fileserver running SerNet Samba 4.0.9 with these
global settings (not overridden):
read only = No
force create mode = 0777
force directory mode = 0777
inherit acls = yes
inherit owner = yes
inherit permissions = yes
On a Windows client, I have Thunderbird 24.0 storing its profile and
mail on the Samba share. The
2008 Aug 29
1
Webalizer displays wrong year
I just run webalizer manually on an Apache log, like I have done many times
before. Some new statistics were created, but for "August 2006" instead of
"August 2008". I cannot figure why!
Because of my mistake, the webalizer statistics for this site have not been
updated since February. Now I tried to update them for the first time - with
the results I described above.
The
2007 May 14
0
Userrights problem: Samba PDC + OpenLDAP
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hello there,
i have a new problem with my samba :-).
i'd created a new user in the OpenLDAP. Then i joined the Domain and
tried to browse in the homedir of the new user.
Here are the rights under Linux:
[16:27:52] jens@saphira:~ > ll
total 1.8M
drwxrwx--- 7 jens Domain Users 632 May 14 16:27 .
drwxrwxrwx 15 nobody root 360 May
2008 Nov 12
2
Bizarre - How did windows user setfacl for a file??
Listmates,
In 8 years, since 2.02 (I think), I have never seen this behavior out of
samba. I run a stand-alone server with WinXP clients. Somehow a legal assistant
created (not intentionally mind you) files and directories with ACL attributes set:
-rwxrwx---+ 1 cyndy ochiltree 21504 2008-10-28 16:48 AUTHORIZATION -
employment.doc*
-rwxrwx---+ 1 cyndy ochiltree 12804 2008-10-28 16:48
2018 Jun 19
1
Fixing sysvol permissions
On Tue, 19 Jun 2018 12:52:46 -0400
Mark Foley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> Given no responses on this question for a few days, I'm concluding
> that we're out of ideas on this problem. Let me propose a couple of
> ideas. Apparently, the basic Windows FOLDER and SHARE permissions
> are correct according to Louis' recommendations (see message below).
2009 Nov 13
0
Dovecot setuid, setgid, permission denied Problem!
Hello! Please, help!
I have trouble with Dovecot's Deliver utility. I don't know how to avoid
errors. Let me know what additional related information do you need?
1) Its call in Exim's configure:
==========================================
local_delivery_spam_transport:
driver = pipe
command = /usr/local/libexec/dovecot/deliver -c
2018 Jun 23
0
Fixing sysvol permissions (SOLVED)
On Wed, 20 Jun 2018 12:05:13 +0200 L.P.H. van Belle wrote:
>
> As said very busy, but i can spare a few minutes now.
>
> -rwxrwxr-x+ 1 3000000 domusers 2240 2018-06-18 17:33:55 /var/lib/samba/sysvol/hprs.local/policies/{3C103F7B-7250-4610-BC45-8B06353CAA7C}/User/Documents & Settings/fdeploy1.ini
> -rwxrwx---+ 1 3000000 users 64 2018-06-18 17:34:22
2018 Jun 19
0
Fixing sysvol permissions
Given no responses on this question for a few days, I'm concluding that we're out of ideas on
this problem. Let me propose a couple of ideas. Apparently, the basic Windows FOLDER and
SHARE permissions are correct according to Louis' recommendations (see message below). One
thing I've noticed that is a bit puzzling is the group ownership of these policy files:
-rwxrwxr-x+ 1
2018 Jun 12
0
Admin UID changed with upgrade to 4.8.2
In order to get help using a more up-to-date version of Samba, I've just upgraded from 4.4.16
to 4.8.2. So far, nothing new seems to be broken, but I still have to track down some issues
I've been having.
First off, I notice that something has changed with my BUILTIN\administrators ID. before, I
had, e.g.:
> ls -l
2015 Mar 20
0
Samba 4.1 gentent, ls, no display domain user name on Primary ACDC but wbinfo -u yes
I install samba 4.1 from
the sources. In Debian 7.0 "wheezy"
a year ago.
Thanks for responding.
From: patocius at hotmail.com
To: rowlandpenny at googlemail.com
Subject: RE: [Samba] Samba 4.1 gentent, ls, no display domain user name on Primary ACDC but wbinfo -u yes
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2015 17:28:05 +0000
I install samba 4.1 from the sources. In Debian 7.0 "wheezy" a
2005 May 19
1
Mac OSX breaking POSIX rights with SMB/CIFS
hi list,
we recently saw the following weird behaviour on samba v3.0.13 with
MacOSX panther and tiger as clients
--setup--
[share1]
path = /data
valid users = @admins
force user = administrator
inherit permissions = yes
force create mode = 770
force directory mode = 2770
[share2]
path = /data/folder
valid users = @noadmins
force user = administrator
inherit permissions = yes
force create mode
2015 Mar 20
0
Samba 4.1 gentent, ls, no display domain user name on Primary ACDC but wbinfo -u yes
Yes im have a file:
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 19K Jan 10 2014 libnss_winbind.so.2
My pam:
PAM profiles to enable:
? [*] Unix authentication
? [*] Winbind NT/Active Directory authentication
? [ ] ConsoleKit Session Management
? [ ] Inheritable Capabilities Management
> Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2015 18:21:57 +0000
> From: rowlandpenny at googlemail.com
> To: samba
2018 Jun 14
0
Admin UID changed with upgrade to 4.8.2
Hi Mark,
See below. ;-)
> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Mark
> Foley via samba
> Verzonden: woensdag 13 juni 2018 22:50
> Aan: samba at lists.samba.org
> Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Admin UID changed with upgrade to 4.8.2
>
> On Wed, 13 Jun 2018 08:50:00 +0200 "L.P.H. van Belle wrote:
> >
>
2015 Mar 20
3
Samba 4.1 gentent, ls, no display domain user name on Primary ACDC but wbinfo -u yes
Hello friends:
I hope you can help me with this I'm struggling a year ago
After breaking my head migrating a server with Samba Samba 2.1 to 4.1 all stay perfect and functional.
All files are in this domain controller for now, and then be moved to a domain member, "the file server".
I configure the server as ADDC Samba 4.1 and up here all went well, the shares, the users, winbind,
2015 Mar 20
0
Samba 4.1 gentent, ls, no display domain user name on Primary ACDC but wbinfo -u yes
OK, i try removing this block, and add the line.
Restart samba but nothing happends.
> Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2015 20:01:04 +0000
> From: rowlandpenny at googlemail.com
> To: samba at lists.samba.org
> Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba 4.1 gentent, ls, no display domain user name on Primary ACDC but wbinfo -u yes
>
> On 20/03/15 19:47, Jhon P wrote:
> >
> >
> > Yes im
2015 Mar 20
2
Samba 4.1 gentent, ls, no display domain user name on Primary ACDC but wbinfo -u yes
On 20/03/15 17:32, Jhon P wrote:
> I install samba 4.1 from
> the sources. In Debian 7.0 "wheezy"
> a year ago.
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks for responding.
>
>
>
>
> From: patocius at hotmail.com
> To: rowlandpenny at googlemail.com
> Subject: RE: [Samba] Samba 4.1 gentent, ls, no display domain user name on Primary ACDC but wbinfo -u yes
> Date:
2012 Jun 18
1
Samba4: s3fs sticky bit file ownership problem
Hi
I want all files created in a share to be group owned by a group called
staff. To do this I have a share called reports which is chmod g+s staff:
drwxrws---+ 9 root staff 4096 Jun 18 11:15 reports
If I create a file from Linux, the sticky bit works:
-rw-rw----+ 1 steve2 staff 0 Jun 18 10:57 stevelinux.txt
If I create it under windows, it doesn't:
-rwxrwx---+ 1 steve2 Domain
2015 Mar 20
0
Samba 4.1 gentent, ls, no display domain user name on Primary ACDC but wbinfo -u yes
Im think not provisioned with provisioned with '--use-rfc2307'
root at proteus:~# ldbsearch -H /usr/local/samba/private/sam.ldb -b 'dc=kennedy,dc=edu' -s sub '(objectclass=msSFU30DomainInfo)'
GENSEC backend 'gssapi_spnego' registered
GENSEC backend 'gssapi_krb5' registered
GENSEC backend 'gssapi_krb5_sasl' registered
GENSEC backend
2020 Jan 27
1
Timer doesn't appear to start
Here is the output
root at nutpi:/etc/nut# ps -elf | grep -E '[n]ut|ups[dms]'
4 S avahi 246 1 0 80 0 - 1472 poll_s Jan26 ? 00:00:31
avahi-daemon: running [nutpi.local]
1 S nut 451 1 0 80 0 - 678 poll_s Jan26 ? 00:03:41
/lib/nut/upscode2 -a deltec-PRA1500
1 S nut 454 1 0 80 0 - 1173 poll_s Jan26 ? 00:00:28
/lib/nut/upsd
1
2007 Aug 12
1
AD + winbindd(8): group permissions being ignored ? WTF ?
Hi all,
I am successfully authenticating "FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT #1: Wed Jul 25
17:31:15 WST 2007" against AD. Users can log in succesfully with home
directories being served via amd(8) and NFS. However, I have discovered
a potential "show-stopper" that will force me to abort this mission :(
The problem
-~-~-~-~-~-
In a nutshell: Simple group permissions set with chown(1) are