similar to: smb2 max credits did not work as expected

On 3/7/23 13:12, jie wang via samba wrote: > Hi, all, > I set smb2 max credits = 70 in smb.conf, but I find more than 200 > read requests > were sent to server in 3 seconds, and has no response during this > period. Each read request's > read len is 2MB, and they share the same "credit charge: 32". > I want to restrict the read request number outstanding at

On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 03:19:59PM +0200, Ralph Boehme wrote: >On 8/21/23 11:53, Jones Syue ??? via samba wrote: >>>OH - that's *really* interesting ! I wonder how it is >>>changing the SMB3+ redirector to do this ? >> >>It looks like applications could do something and give a hint to SMB3+ >>redirector, so far not quite sure how to make it, >>per

Hello Jeremy, > OH - that's *really* interesting ! I wonder how it is > changing the SMB3+ redirector to do this ? It looks like applications could do something and give a hint to SMB3+ redirector, so far not quite sure how to make it, per process monitor (procmon) could show that write I/O size seems could be pass from the application layers,

Hello, since we install the most recent windows updates from 07/2023 Test-ComputerSecureChannel -Verbose show False [4]. Moved the machine to local workgroup, deleted machine account on the ad controller and rejoined it (which works), but Test-ComputerSecureChannel -Verbose show again False. I'm not sure this is an issue on the samba or on the windows side. Affected samba versions so far:

On 7/14/23 07:42, Daniel M?ller wrote: > Where to get the patch? > We are running samba 4.17.4 on debian11 . We compiled from source. it's linked in the bugreport https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15418 <https://cpaste.org/?df0494cac0063e2e#Cx69G684EBPQ71S6sAUVXSYburgV6gPyKHfPSbfmHZPJ> Hth! -slow -- Ralph Boehme, Samba Team https://samba.org/

Where to get the patch? We are running samba 4.17.4 on debian11 . We compiled from source. Greetings Daniel -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- Von: Ralph Boehme via samba [mailto:samba at lists.samba.org] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 13. Juli 2023 18:40 An: samba <samba at lists.samba.org> Betreff: Re: [Samba] Test-ComputerSecureChannel -Verbose False since windows 10/11 update 07/2023 Hi

Hello all, https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15418#c20 "This could be a shortterm fix in order to behave like an unpatched windows server" What is the attack scenario of an unpatched windows server? After all Microsoft likely patched to fix an issue, the short term solution probably restores not only NLA but also the vulnerability.. I am not arguing against the fix, as the

Yes, in my opinion quite an arrogancy... This is the translation of what I got from the supporter: "Our developers have discussed and have concluded that we stand by our previous statement and define the problem as a problem of Samba AD Server (4.17.*). Although Synology is an open source product based on Samba, but we don't always stick to it and adapt our own code in many

Sebastian Neustein wrote: > I have to migrate our data from one old samba server to a new one. Due > to various reasons we had to change some settings. Now I struggle to > get the acls right. > ?Previously the acls were stored via posix and extended attributes, > now they are stored only in extended attributes With the default settings of vfs_acl_xattr samba takes posix acls

Hi Ralph > On 8/18/23 09:55, Sebastian Neustein via samba wrote: >> With the default settings of vfs_acl_xattr samba takes posix acls >> into account when delivering data - how can I activate >> "acl_xattr:ignore system acls = yes" >> without loosing the information saved in posix acls? Background: our >> future file system won't be able to support

Hi, I'm running Samba Active Directory 4.16.9 with packages from Sernet. Domain members are Linux servers (Ubuntu 20.04, RHEL 8) with Sernet Samba 4.16.x. I'm getting crazy with group memberships syncing from AD to Linux members. It is completely random as when changes in AD group are visible in Linux OS (or more precise: winbind), it might take minutes, hours or days as when these

Hi all! The 22nd International User and Developer Conference sambaXP will take place from 9th - 11th of May 2020 in G?ttingen, Germany. https://sambaxp.org/ New for this year's event: the Microsoft Interoperability Track on day 2. Looking forward to meet you there! -slow -- Ralph Boehme, Samba Team https://samba.org/ SerNet Samba Team Lead

Hello Ralph, Thanks for that hint about case sensitivity's performance penalty. For clarifaction: The user is doing mainly reads, so does the "create" you mention also cover opening/reading files? If only _creation_ of files is suffering from that we probably have some other/further performance issue. We have gpfs, which does not offer a case-insensitive mode, neither does the

On Sat, 2023-03-11 at 07:38 +0100, Ralph Boehme wrote: > On 3/11/23 04:33, Andrew Bartlett via samba wrote: > > On Fri, 2023-03-10 at 13:06 -0800, Ray Klassen via samba wrote: > > > I'm very interested in this. Can one of the devs elaborate on what has been > > > accomplished with this? Specifically, I'd like to know if the support is > > > bidirectional

Hi! Is it possible for windows to actually see and use symlinks on samba server? Windows NTFS does have notion of junctions and symbolic links, so when one open file A (which is a symbolic link), windows actually opens file B. Can such mechanism be used when A is on samba share? This is probably a protocol question more than samba question. Thanks, /mjt

We had a recent data loss event that we're trying to analyze to learn what happened. On one of our Linux VMs, the /var partition suddenly went offline, which is never a good thing. (Later reboots revealed a corrupted filesystem that needed to be repaired, resulting in data loss.) Nothing could be written to /var, including logs in /var/log, but the VM continued to run. On that VM, we had a

Hi Thanks for the tip, but i have tried that too. No go. The only thing right now that works is to omit S from /COPY:DATSO, ie skip security descriptors. Makes no sense but that's what I have found out after dozens of tests. I will recreate the shares and be careful to follow Rowlands advise on setting the correct rights on the share. m?n 19 juni 2023 kl. 23:42 skrev spindles7 via samba

Hi folks, we are running a clustered Samba Fileserver using CTDB with two public IPs. We observed the following (mis) behavior: If user A with write permissions opens an excel file via public ip A and User B opens the same file via public ip B, both users get a Deny-Write lock on the same file and overwrite each others changes: 0:3693691 145522 DENY_WRITE 0x12019f RDWR

On Wed, 31 Jan 2024 10:09:53 +0100 Ralph Boehme via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On 1/31/24 09:50, Peter Milesson via samba wrote: > > The crucial problem here is, that Everyone (yes, really everyone) > > can write to the root share. > > why don't you just change it? That's how it's supposed to work. > > -slow > It might be

On 31.01.2024 10:09, Ralph Boehme via samba wrote: > On 1/31/24 09:50, Peter Milesson via samba wrote: >> The crucial problem here is, that Everyone (yes, really everyone) can >> write to the root share. > > why don't you just change it? That's how it's supposed to work. > > -slow > Hi Ralph, Unfortunately, that doesn't work. In share permissions,