similar to: Bug#489106: xen-unstable: FTBFS: *** check_openssl_devel FAILED: missing openssl headers

Source: xen Version: 4.0.1-2 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian-qa at lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110313 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > make[3]: Entering directory `/build/user-xen_4.0.1-2-amd64-2x64p6/xen-4.0.1/debian/build/build-docs/docs' > latex

Source: xen Version: 4.1.1-2 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian-qa at lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111022 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > make[5]: Entering directory `/build/xen-njlTaX/xen-4.1.1/debian/build/build-utils_amd64/tools/check' > PYTHON=python2.6

Package: xen-3 version: 3.1.0-2 Severity: serious User: debian-qa at lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070917 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on i386 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386. Relevant part: make[5]: Entering directory `/build/user/xen-3-3.1.0/debian/build/build-utils_i386/tools/libxc' gcc -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -m32 -march=i686

Hi, I am trying to make xen but am getting the following problem when compiling, does anyone know what is wrong? Checking check_crypto_lib: OK Checking check_curl: unused, OK Checking check_openssl_devel: *** Check for openssl headers FAILED Checking check_python: OK Checking check_python_devel: OK Checking check_x11_devel: OK Checking check_xgettext: OK Checking check_xml2:

This is the error I get while building Xen-3.2.1 when I do a make =============================================== make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/src/xen-3.2.1/tools/check'' LIBXENAPI_BINDINGS=n ACM_SECURITY=n ./chk build Xen CHECK-BUILD Fri Jul 18 11:36:34 IST 2008 Checking check_crypto_lib: OK Checking check_curl: unused, OK Checking check_openssl_devel: *** Check for openssl

Package: xen-utils-common Version: 3.0.3-0-1 Severity: serious Justification: makes package uninstallable Usertags: grid5000 Hi, During a piuparts run over all the packages in etch, I ran into a problem with your package: Setting up xen-utils-common (3.0.3-0-1) ... ln: creating symbolic link `/etc/udev/rules.d/z60_xen-backend.rules' to `../xen-backend.rules': No such file or directory

Dear all Some computations gave a matrix. The single value decomposition of it worked fine previously, after an system upgrade I get the following error: ----- > La.svd(x,256,256) Error in La.svd(x, nu, nv) : BLAS/LAPACK routine 'DLASCL' gave error code -4 ----- Erroneous Matrix: ftp://usys-ftp.ethz.ch/ITES/STEP/nussbaum/R/matrix-lapack-error4.RData /.csv Operating System: Debian 8

Package: xen-unstable Version: 3.0-unstable+hg11561-1 Severity: serious Build-depends on linux-support-2.6.17-2, which is no longer available in sid. -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! <stephen@marenka.net> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size:

Dear Debian Xen Team, The following possible problem(s) were detected in the package(s) you maintain in Debian: === xen-unstable: = This package has not been in testing for 353 days. = This package has not been able to migrate from unstable to testing for 353 days. See <http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=xen-unstable> This is an automated mail. These mails are sent

Source: xen Version: 4.1.2-3 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian-qa at lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > make[7]: Entering directory `/?PKGBUILDDIR?/debian/build/build-utils_amd64/tools/firmware' > /usr/bin/make -C etherboot

Package: xen-unstable Version: 3.3-unstable+hg17961-1 Severity: normal Tags: sid User: debian-gcc at lists.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-gcc-4.5 The package fails to build in a test rebuild on at least amd64 with gcc-4.5/g++-4.5, but succeeds to build with gcc-4.4/g++-4.4. For the compiler version used, see: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2010/01/msg00230.html The full build log can be found

Source: xcp-storage-managers Version: 0.1.1-3 Severity: serious Tags: jessie sid User: debian-qa at lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130509 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > cc -O2 -I/usr/include/python2.6 -I/usr/include -fPIC -c -o xslib_wrap.o xslib_wrap.c >

Hi, AFAIK, the status of Xen in lenny is currently the following: - no dom0 kernel - domU kernel only for i386 (no domU kernel for amd64) I was told (I don't remember where) that this is because the vanilla kernel only supports domU for i386, and has no dom0 support, so distros have to port the patches to their kernels (please correct me if I'm wrong). However: - etch shipped with dom0

Source: xen-api-libs Version: 0.5.2-3 Severity: serious Tags: jessie sid User: debian-qa at lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130620 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > make[2]: Entering directory `/?PKGBUILDDIR?/stdext' > ocamlfind ocamlc -I ../xml-light2 -I ../stdext -I

Dear Madlene, while this list serves as a forum for discussions about R backports present on CRAN, this would be something preferably filed in the Debian bug tracking system bts.debian.org - could you file a bug there? But please don't ask me on which package - maybe Dirk has a good answer to that one... Cheers, Johannes P.S.: https://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting Am Dienstag, 16.

Dear Debian Xen Team, The following possible problem(s) were detected in the package(s) you maintain in Debian: xen-unstable: This package has not been in testing for more than 196 days. This is an semi-automated mail. These mails will be sent monthly. For more information about these mails, refer to http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/DdpoByMail We are sorry if this mail was useless for

=== xen-3: = 2 bug(s) that should be fixed for the next Debian release: - #391935 <http://bugs.debian.org/391935> Xen trademark might be problematic - #490409 <http://bugs.debian.org/490409> CVE-2008-2004: privilege escalation ------------ interesting stuff probably ends here ------------ This is an automated mail. These mails are sent two times per month. For more information

Dear Debian Xen Team, The following possible problem(s) were detected in the package(s) you maintain in Debian: === xen-3: = This package has 1 bug(s) that should be fixed for the next Debian release: - #464969 <http://bugs.debian.org/464969> xen-hypervisor-3.2-1-i386: Linux mmap()/vmsplice() exploit causes memory map corruption in hypervisor regardless of domain privilege This is a

=== xen-3: = 1 bug(s) that should be fixed for the next Debian release: - #391935 <http://bugs.debian.org/391935> Xen trademark might be problematic ------------ interesting stuff probably ends here ------------ This is an automated mail. These mails are sent two times per month. For more information about these mails, refer to http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/DdpoByMail We are sorry

Dear Debian Xen Team, The following possible problem(s) were detected in the package(s) you maintain in Debian: === xen-unstable: = This package has not been in testing for 292 days. = This package has not been able to migrate from unstable to testing for 292 days. See <http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=xen-unstable> This is an automated mail. These mails are sent