similar to: [PATCH net-next v3 1/3] vsock: support sockmap

On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 07:04:33PM +0000, Bobby Eshleman wrote: > Add support for sockmap to vsock. > > We're testing usage of vsock as a way to redirect guest-local UDS > requests to the host and this patch series greatly improves the > performance of such a setup. > > Compared to copying packets via userspace, this improves throughput by > 121% in basic testing.

Bobby Eshleman wrote: > We're testing usage of vsock as a way to redirect guest-local UDS > requests to the host and this patch series greatly improves the > performance of such a setup. > > Compared to copying packets via userspace, this improves throughput by > 121% in basic testing. > > Tested as follows. > > Setup: guest unix dgram sender -> guest vsock

On Tue, Aug 01, 2023 at 04:30:22AM +0000, Bobby Eshleman wrote: >On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 09:48:21AM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 02:38:08PM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >> > On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 12:50:14AM +0000, Bobby Eshleman wrote: >> > > This commit adds a feature bit for virtio vsock to support datagrams. >> > >

On Thu, Aug 03, 2023 at 06:58:24PM +0000, Bobby Eshleman wrote: >On Thu, Aug 03, 2023 at 02:42:26PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 03, 2023 at 12:53:22AM +0000, Bobby Eshleman wrote: >> > On Wed, Aug 02, 2023 at 10:24:44PM +0000, Bobby Eshleman wrote: >> > > On Sun, Jul 23, 2023 at 12:53:15AM +0300, Arseniy Krasnov wrote: >> > > >

On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 07:47:32PM +0000, Bobby Eshleman wrote: >Previous to setting the owner the socket is found via >vsock_find_connected_socket(), which returns sk after a call to >sock_hold(). > >If setting the owner fails, then sock_put() needs to be called. > >Fixes: f9d2b1e146e0 ("virtio/vsock: fix leaks due to missing skb owner") >Signed-off-by: Bobby

On Sat, Sep 02, 2023 at 09:24:26AM +0000, Bobby Eshleman wrote: > On Sat, Sep 02, 2023 at 04:41:28AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 02, 2023 at 04:37:19AM +0000, Bobby Eshleman wrote: > > > On Fri, Sep 01, 2023 at 09:31:03AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 12:43:03AM +0000, Bobby Eshleman wrote: > > > >

From: Cong Wang <cong.wang at bytedance.com> When virtqueue_add_sgs() fails, the skb is put back to send queue, we should not deliver the copy to tap device in this case. So we need to move virtio_transport_deliver_tap_pkt() down after all possible failures. Fixes: 82dfb540aeb2 ("VSOCK: Add virtio vsock vsockmon hooks") Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha at redhat.com> Cc:

On Sat, Sep 02, 2023 at 04:37:19AM +0000, Bobby Eshleman wrote: > On Fri, Sep 01, 2023 at 09:31:03AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 12:43:03AM +0000, Bobby Eshleman wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 06:21:35PM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 09:29:45PM +0000, Bobby Eshleman wrote: > > > >

On Sat, Sep 02, 2023 at 04:37:19AM +0000, Bobby Eshleman wrote: > On Fri, Sep 01, 2023 at 09:31:03AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 12:43:03AM +0000, Bobby Eshleman wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 06:21:35PM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 09:29:45PM +0000, Bobby Eshleman wrote: > > > >

On Sat, Sep 02, 2023 at 04:56:42AM +0000, Bobby Eshleman wrote: > On Fri, Sep 01, 2023 at 02:45:14PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 09:29:45PM +0000, Bobby Eshleman wrote: > > > This adds support for datagrams to the virtio-vsock device. > > > > > > virtio-vsock already supports stream and seqpacket types. The existing > >

On Sat, Sep 02, 2023 at 04:56:42AM +0000, Bobby Eshleman wrote: > On Fri, Sep 01, 2023 at 02:45:14PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 09:29:45PM +0000, Bobby Eshleman wrote: > > > This adds support for datagrams to the virtio-vsock device. > > > > > > virtio-vsock already supports stream and seqpacket types. The existing > >

Am 2018-06-15 um 17:19 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > On Fri, 15 Jun 2018 15:53:09 +0200 > "Stefan G. Weichinger via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Am 2018-06-15 um 15:16 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger via samba: >>> Am 2018-06-15 um 14:44 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger via samba: >>> >>>> on my way now ... glibc new,

On Sat, Mar 18, 2023 at 12:32:39AM +0000, Bobby Eshleman wrote: > On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 09:38:38AM +0100, Stefano Garzarella wrote: > > Hi Bobby, > > FYI we have also this one, but it seems related to > > syzbot+befff0a9536049e7902e at syzkaller.appspotmail.com > > > > Thanks, > > Stefano > > > > Got it, I'll look into it. > It seems

On Sat, Mar 25, 2023 at 1:44?AM Bobby Eshleman <bobbyeshleman at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 09:38:38AM +0100, Stefano Garzarella wrote: > > Hi Bobby, > > FYI we have also this one, but it seems related to > > syzbot+befff0a9536049e7902e at syzkaller.appspotmail.com > > > > Thanks, > > Stefano > > > > Got it, I'll

On Tue, 7 Apr 2015, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > Whereas syslinux.efi apparently uses the embedded gpxe/ tree, and that > one uses TCP timestamps. See tcp_xmit() in gpxe/src/net/tcp.c: Actually syslinux.efi seems to be using the implementation calling into UEFI via these functions: http://git.kernel.org/cgit/boot/syslinux/syslinux.git/tree/efi/tcp.c I've tried to add debug messages to these

This patch adds the support of multiple transports in the VSOCK core. With the multi-transports support, we can use vsock with nested VMs (using also different hypervisors) loading both guest->host and host->guest transports at the same time. Major changes: - vsock core module can be loaded regardless of the transports - vsock_core_init() and vsock_core_exit() are renamed to

This patch adds the support of multiple transports in the VSOCK core. With the multi-transports support, we can use vsock with nested VMs (using also different hypervisors) loading both guest->host and host->guest transports at the same time. Major changes: - vsock core module can be loaded interdependently of the transports - each 'struct virtio_transport' has a new feature fields

There is a need for communication channel between host and various agents that are running inside a VM guest. The channel will be used for statistic gathering, logging, cut & paste, host screen resolution changes notifications, guest configuration etc. It is undesirable to use TCP/IP for this purpose since network connectivity may not exist between host and guest and if it exists the traffic

There is a need for communication channel between host and various agents that are running inside a VM guest. The channel will be used for statistic gathering, logging, cut & paste, host screen resolution changes notifications, guest configuration etc. It is undesirable to use TCP/IP for this purpose since network connectivity may not exist between host and guest and if it exists the traffic

On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 03:07:57PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote: > vmci_transport never allowed half-closed socket on the host side. > Since we want to have the same behaviour across all transports, we > add a section in the "Implementation notes". > > Cc: Jorgen Hansen <jhansen at vmware.com> > Cc: Adit Ranadive <aditr at vmware.com> > Signed-off-by: