similar to: "Timeout (180s) while waiting for lock for transaction log file" since 2.3 upgrade?

dovecot 2.1.x and 2.2.x has "just worked" with a minimal configuration for just about anything I've ever thrown at it. Now, with 2.3.0, there is one user (and only one user) that continually sees horrible delays, which is not surprising given the logs: Error: imap(user)<70175><356C8oljxrCBUppP>: Timeout (180s) while waiting for lock for transaction log file

Hello, We still have problems with our updated dovecot servers... The problem now is that we are having errors like: Jul 9 10:22:02 myotis31 dovecot: lmtp(15431, <user>): Error: Timeout (180s) while waiting for lock for transaction log file /var/indexes/<user>/.INBOX/dovecot.index.log Jul 9 10:22:02 myotis31 dovecot: lmtp(15431, <user>): Error: +4YfCwKS+k9HPAAAmo+UlA:

I hoping this is an RTFM ... and somebody can point me at the correct 'FM' :-) I've just spent a while setting my new Debian , allways-on box in what I suspect is a generally useful configuration. I have fetchmail(1) collect mail from many mailboxes via pop3. I store these mails in different mboxs according to rules in procmail(1) I then offer these out to the household via imap

I am trying to sync several specific files over ssh. This works fine when I specify the files indivdually, a la: rsync -av --rsync-path=/usr/local/bin/rsync /etc/passwd remotehost:/etc/passwd What I want to do though, is update several files at once, a la: rsync -av --rsync-path=/usr/local/bin/rsync --include-from updatesys.inc remotehost: See below for updatesys.inc. The file list gets

Hi all, I would like to use AutoFS on Samba but I encounter difficulties with ldap entries. I have already add the Automount Schema from the Wiki (https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba_AD_schema_extensions) but I can't add "auto_master" and the folowings leaf. I tried : dn: automountmapname=auto_master,dc=MYDOMAIN automountMapName: auto_master objectClass: automountMap

On Mon, 18 Jan 1999 samba@samba.org wrote: > Date: Sun, 17 Jan 1999 14:55:42 +0730 (SST) > From: Gregory Hosler <gregory.hosler@eno.ericsson.se> > To: samba@samba.org, samba-bugs@samba.org, btenison@dibbs.net > Subject: request_oplock_break - a clue - what does it mean ? > Message-ID: <XFMail.990117145542.gregory.hosler@eno.ericsson.se> > > Hi all, > > I

Hi all, I have an NFS server on our network sharing out package files for Puppet to install to all and sundry. The clients access said NFS server via an automounter configuration (I don''t want the packages share mounted all the time, only when installing packages) As a result, installation of packages depends on autofs... So I have the following: service { "autofs": ensure

To get the automount schema to work with the git checkout of samba 4 I had to modify the automount schema files and separate the attributes from the classes. I also discovered that it's required to have the ntSecurityDescriptor , instanceType, and objectCategory attributes. Without these it will crash whenever you try to browse... I did alot of stopping samba, tarring of /usr/local/samba and

On 28 July 2015 at 21:12, Peter Maydell <peter.maydell at linaro.org> wrote: > On 28 July 2015 at 11:27, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 11:12:33AM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: >>> On 28 July 2015 at 11:08, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: >>> > On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 10:44:02AM +0100, Graeme

Hello, I have an old crossword program that runs OK on Win98, WinMe, and XP. I have installed, via yum, wine and wine-devel and the associated dependencies on my Fedora 8 system. I have copied all the files from the program's install floppy to a directory in my home folder, the same as installing it on XP. However, when the program tries to access the word files it fails and says to see

On 28 July 2015 at 11:27, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 11:12:33AM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: >> On 28 July 2015 at 11:08, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: >> > On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 10:44:02AM +0100, Graeme Gregory wrote: >> >> Added the match table and pointers for ACPI probing to the driver.

On 28 July 2015 at 11:27, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 11:12:33AM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: >> On 28 July 2015 at 11:08, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: >> > On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 10:44:02AM +0100, Graeme Gregory wrote: >> >> Added the match table and pointers for ACPI probing to the driver.

On 28 July 2015 at 11:27, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 11:12:33AM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: >> On 28 July 2015 at 11:08, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: >> > On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 10:44:02AM +0100, Graeme Gregory wrote: >> >> Added the match table and pointers for ACPI probing to the driver.

On 28 July 2015 at 11:27, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 11:12:33AM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: >> On 28 July 2015 at 11:08, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: >> > On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 10:44:02AM +0100, Graeme Gregory wrote: >> >> Added the match table and pointers for ACPI probing to the driver.

On 28 July 2015 at 11:08, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 10:44:02AM +0100, Graeme Gregory wrote: >> Added the match table and pointers for ACPI probing to the driver. >> >> This uses the same identifier for virt devices as being used for qemu >> ARM64 ACPI support. >> >>

On 28 July 2015 at 11:08, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 10:44:02AM +0100, Graeme Gregory wrote: >> Added the match table and pointers for ACPI probing to the driver. >> >> This uses the same identifier for virt devices as being used for qemu >> ARM64 ACPI support. >> >>

--Apologies if you get two copies of this message - it was submitted for moderation and hasn''t appeared on the list in two days, so I''m resubmitting. Hi all, Just a quick question. Is it possible to utilise an Apple Xserve RAID as an array for use with ZFS with RAID-Z in Solaris? I''ve seen various mentions of ''zfs'' and ''xserve

On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 10:44:02AM +0100, Graeme Gregory wrote: > Added the match table and pointers for ACPI probing to the driver. > > This uses the same identifier for virt devices as being used for qemu > ARM64 ACPI support. > > http://git.linaro.org/people/shannon.zhao/qemu.git/commit/d0bf1955a3ecbab4b51d46f8c5dda02b7e14a17e > > Signed-off-by: Graeme Gregory

On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 11:12:33AM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 28 July 2015 at 11:08, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 10:44:02AM +0100, Graeme Gregory wrote: > >> Added the match table and pointers for ACPI probing to the driver. > >> > >> This uses the same identifier for virt devices as being used for qemu

On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 10:44:02AM +0100, Graeme Gregory wrote: > Added the match table and pointers for ACPI probing to the driver. > > This uses the same identifier for virt devices as being used for qemu > ARM64 ACPI support. > > http://git.linaro.org/people/shannon.zhao/qemu.git/commit/d0bf1955a3ecbab4b51d46f8c5dda02b7e14a17e > > Signed-off-by: Graeme Gregory