Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "unable to access xen guest's console"
2008 May 14
4
Default PXE boot timeout
Hello all,
I have a NFSroot'ed a couple of OS platforms so that servers can have
the option (web access) to:
a. boot off a CentOS NFS root over the network
b. or LOCAL hardrive (FreeBSD).
A Simple script controls this so that if user selects NFS root -
- /etc/dhcpd.conf will be updated to include the filename "pxelinux.0"
parameter and it will find its configuration file based
2008 Jun 11
6
Ubuntu 7.x and 8x as Xen Guest OS
Hello all,
I have a Xen kernel running on a CentOS 5.1: xen-users@lists.xensource.com
The Xen versions I have are:
rpm -qa | grep xen
kernel-xen-2.6.18-53.1.21.el5
xen-libs-3.0.3-41.el5_1.6
xen-3.0.3-41.el5_1.6
xen-devel-3.0.3-41.el5_1.6
So far I have a few Guest DOMU''s installed successfully - various
CentOS flavors ...
1. I am able to successfully install Ubuntu 6.06 as a Xen
2008 Feb 13
1
Linux client cannot mount to NFS-Root: Portmap RPC call returned error 101
Hello all,
I have seen various reports on this error posted in the past few
years, but was unable to find a resolution to the various postings.
I've googled the error messages too, and have hit on various sporadic
similar problems encountered with no resolutions ..
Apologize if this has been exhaustively queried upon in the past;
however, I'd like to try asking again, nevertheless:
2011 Mar 14
0
New Webinar Series For Asterisk Users: Asterisk Tech-Tips
Greetings Users!
On March 24th we're hosting the first of a new series of webinars entitled "Asterisk Tech-Tips". Our goal is to present a new "episode" or "issue" or "webisode" (or whatever you want to call it) every other week. Here's the idea:
Asterisk Tech-Tips are all about helping people get the most from their Asterisk systems. Each
2011 Mar 24
0
Asterisk Tech Tips: Calling With Google Starts At Noon Central (30 minutes from now)
Greetings User's List,
Just a last minute reminder that Malcolm Davenport will be headlining our first Asterisk Tech Tips webinar covering the cool ways you can integrate Asterisk with Google Chat and Google Voice. Register now and join us in 30 minutes. Here's the link:
http://www.asterisk.org/techtips
Thanks!
-S
Steve Sokol
Asterisk Marketing Director
Digium, Inc.
2008 Jun 26
0
gentoo pxelinux boot - pass hostname to dhcp client
Hello all,
I have finally successfully booted a diskless NFS Gentoo client and I
am very pleased with it!
I only have one issue left I'd like to understand; the master Gentoo
server that I based my diskless image from boots nicely via dhcp and
accepts the hostname parameter its DHCP server passes along with its
leased IP address. I have posted in the Gentoo forum, but thought I'd
post
2007 Dec 11
6
Where does xen chache domUs grub.conf ?
Hi all, I''m a newbie on this list. I''m using xen 3.0.3 on CentOS50.
I installed a new flavor of kernel in a domU via a standard RPM, which
modified my grub.conf by adding a new entry to boot on the new kernel.
When rebooting the domU by pygrub, I didn''t see the new grub entry. I
tried to restart xend, with no effect.
By googling a little, I understood that kernel
2011 Aug 29
1
Auth forwarding socket for single auth
Hi all,
authentication forwarding depends much on the environment it is used
in, but generally on shared hosts it is considered insecure, as this
documentation and common sense tell us:
http://unixwiz.net/techtips/ssh-agent-forwarding.html
Anyway, I have an auth forwarding security enhancement proposal. I
hope I am not duplicating someone else's words/thoughts, please notify
me if this is
2013 Feb 16
1
Write access for wiki howto "Nested virtualization on CentOS 6"
Dear admins,
My centos wiki username: MarkSmulders
Proposed subject: Nested virtualization on CentOS 6
Proposed location: under Howto > Virtualization
Content is ready for preview under "Steps to enable nested virtualization
on CentOS 6" in my online notes at
https://sites.google.com/a/nocoffee.nl/technotes/nested-virtualization-on-centos-6
Thanks,
Mark
(using alias
2014 Jul 29
2
isohybrid: slint64-14.1.iso: unable to find mac efi image
HI,
In http://slint.fr/misc/MacBoot/ you'll find all context information. All
files referenced here are stored there.
Long story short: once dd-ed on an USB stick the ISO image can boot on
a BIOS or EFI machine, but I want it to be able to boot on most x86_64
Macs with an EFI firmware.
Unfortunately I get the error message:
isohybrid: slint64-14.1.iso: unable to find mac efi image
The
2018 Dec 14
0
[WIP PATCH 02/15] drm/dp_mst: Refactor drm_dp_update_payload_part1()
There should be no functional changes here
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude at redhat.com>
Cc: Juston Li <juston.li at intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c | 71 ++++++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
index 9b1b5c9b1fa0..2ab16c9e6243
2019 Oct 22
0
[PATCH v5 01/14] drm/dp_mst: Destroy MSTBs asynchronously
When reprobing an MST topology during resume, we have to account for the
fact that while we were suspended it's possible that mstbs may have been
removed from any ports in the topology. Since iterating downwards in the
topology requires that we hold &mgr->lock, destroying MSTBs from this
context would result in attempting to lock &mgr->lock a second time and
deadlocking.
So, fix
2019 Sep 03
0
[PATCH v2 03/27] drm/dp_mst: Destroy MSTBs asynchronously
When reprobing an MST topology during resume, we have to account for the
fact that while we were suspended it's possible that mstbs may have been
removed from any ports in the topology. Since iterating downwards in the
topology requires that we hold &mgr->lock, destroying MSTBs from this
context would result in attempting to lock &mgr->lock a second time and
deadlocking.
So, fix
2019 Sep 25
0
[PATCH v2 03/27] drm/dp_mst: Destroy MSTBs asynchronously
On Wed, 2019-09-25 at 14:16 -0400, Sean Paul wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 04:45:41PM -0400, Lyude Paul wrote:
> > When reprobing an MST topology during resume, we have to account for the
> > fact that while we were suspended it's possible that mstbs may have been
> > removed from any ports in the topology. Since iterating downwards in the
> > topology requires
2018 Dec 14
1
[WIP PATCH 02/15] drm/dp_mst: Refactor drm_dp_update_payload_part1()
On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 08:25:31PM -0500, Lyude Paul wrote:
> There should be no functional changes here
Would be good to explain what you did refactor here, instead of me trying
to reconstruct it from the patch. Especially pre-coffee that helps :-)
>
> Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude at redhat.com>
> Cc: Juston Li <juston.li at intel.com>
> ---
>
2018 Dec 20
0
[PATCH v2 01/16] drm/dp_mst: Rename drm_dp_mst_get_validated_(port|mstb)_ref and friends
s/drm_dp_get_validated_port_ref/drm_dp_mst_topology_get_port_validated/
s/drm_dp_put_port/drm_dp_mst_topology_put_port/
s/drm_dp_get_validated_mstb_ref/drm_dp_mst_topology_get_mstb_validated/
s/drm_dp_put_mst_branch_device/drm_dp_mst_topology_put_mstb/
This is a much more consistent naming scheme, and will make even more
sense once we redesign how the current refcounting scheme here works.
2019 Sep 03
0
[PATCH v2 10/27] drm/dp_mst: Remove huge conditional in drm_dp_mst_handle_up_req()
Which reduces indentation and makes this function more legible.
Cc: Juston Li <juston.li at intel.com>
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak at intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
Cc: Harry Wentland <hwentlan at amd.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude at redhat.com>
---
2019 Sep 03
0
[PATCH v2 19/27] drm/dp_mst: Handle UP requests asynchronously
Once upon a time, hotplugging devices on MST branches actually worked in
DRM. Now, it only works in amdgpu (likely because of how it's hotplug
handlers are implemented). On both i915 and nouveau, hotplug
notifications from MST branches are noticed - but trying to respond to
them causes messaging timeouts and causes the whole topology state to go
out of sync with reality, usually resulting in
2019 Oct 22
0
[PATCH v5 04/14] drm/dp_mst: Handle UP requests asynchronously
Once upon a time, hotplugging devices on MST branches actually worked in
DRM. Now, it only works in amdgpu (likely because of how it's hotplug
handlers are implemented). On both i915 and nouveau, hotplug
notifications from MST branches are noticed - but trying to respond to
them causes messaging timeouts and causes the whole topology state to go
out of sync with reality, usually resulting in
2019 Sep 27
1
[PATCH v2 03/27] drm/dp_mst: Destroy MSTBs asynchronously
On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 04:08:22PM -0400, Lyude Paul wrote:
> On Wed, 2019-09-25 at 14:16 -0400, Sean Paul wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 04:45:41PM -0400, Lyude Paul wrote:
> > > When reprobing an MST topology during resume, we have to account for the
> > > fact that while we were suspended it's possible that mstbs may have been
> > > removed from any