similar to: samba idmap mystery

On 27/11/2019 11:03, S?rgio Basto via samba wrote: > Sorry I meant man idmap_ad. But checking again man is equal of > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Idmap_config_ad in EXAMPLES of man > page [1] > > Examples don't mention netbios name ... I did [2] which instead use > workgroup I used netbios name and it is working but still don't know > why or even if it correct

Hi all, I have exactly the same problem as the OP and tried the solution below, but I still get the error: 'Username IUCNNL\PC050$ is invalid on this system'. Should I map useraccount, enable Guest account, chang eunix directory permissions or things like that? Problem: My Windows 10 computers' machine accounts cannot acces shares on a domain member (samba 4.6 , id map = ad, centos

On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 11:19 AM, Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny241155 at gmail.com > wrote: > On 07/11/15 16:02, Krutskikh Ivan wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I need to change ownership of server files to user/group defined in active >> directory ( using rfc2307 and unix attributes). Chown returns no error, >> but >> 'ls -lia' shows that file ownership

Following the guidance here, https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Idmap_config_ad, I added idmap lines to my smb.conf file on my Samba 4.7 AD-DC server on Ubuntu 18.04. Samba no longer starts and testparm reports that the idmap ranges for the default * domain and the AD domain are overlapping. Here's my smb.conf file (FWIW, if I don't comment security = ADS, server role is set to Member

Hi all, What is the real purpose if the following lines when using idmap-rid or idmap-ad: # Default idmap config for local BUILTIN accounts and groups idmap config * : backend = tdb idmap config * : range = 3000-7999 When using the next two lines # idmap config for the SAMDOM domain idmap config SAMDOM : backend = rid [or ad] idmap config SAMDOM : range = 10000-999999 AD users will be in

On 03/04/15 13:05, Andrey Repin wrote: > Greetings, Ashish Yadav! > >>>> I'm trying to get the former PDC back into domain after performing a >>> classic >>>> migration. >>>> AD DC is running fine... if you can call it that. >>>> I've edited the smb.conf and nsswitch.conf as suggested in Wiki article, >>> and

Hi list, I just upgraded my Samba AD DC to v4.9.4. Unfortunately, I can't recall which version I had before that, I believe it must have been something between 4.6 and 4.8. Anyway, now that the upgrade is done, it looks like DNS is gone. Host commands are timing out, netstat reveals that no process is listening on :53. Other than that, Samba is starting and working fine. I can list shares,

> > On 24/06/15 02:55, David Minard wrote: >> On 23/06/15 13:32, David Minard wrote: >> >>> I've Set up a DC and a Member Server for a file server. Both are >>> running on Centos7 and samba version 4.2.2. The Member Server is >>> running smbd and winbindd. >>> >>> I've followed the wiki and for the most part

On 23/06/15 13:32, David Minard wrote: > I've Set up a DC and a Member Server for a file server. Both are running on Centos7 and samba version 4.2.2. The Member Server is running smbd and winbindd. > > I've followed the wiki and for the most part it's working. However, after stuffing up the ranges, then fixing them up, when I create new accounts, adding all the

On Sat, 21 Jan 2017 18:05:52 +0000 Alex Crow via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Yes, this does not make sense. > > If I have member file servers, and I want to be in control of which > groups can access what, surely winbind needs to be able to get a GID > from AD? > > It may be different in our case as we migrated from classic Samba, but > every

Rowland, I was just reading over another thread on this list about the inability to access group policy from client machines. The user did not have the symlinks setup (I do) but one thing you mentioned was using the NIS attributes to set UID/GID numbers for the domain. You said we should not do this for certain users and groups, but there is no mention of this in the guides to setting up an AD DC,

I've spent some time updating, upgrading and generally consolidating an old Samba AD. I've managed to remove a very old unsupported (4.2) Samba AD DC following migration to a couple of new DC's - that seems to have worked out OK. Workstation logons and GPO's working fine. I'm now left with one problem after joining a new Samba (4.5.12) member server to the domain for file

OK, so since it appears our only recourse is to build a new domain from scratch, how can we prevent this from happening again? We have several Gentoo workstations, a bunch of Windows 7 workstations, and a few NAS devices which run Linux of some flavor. How do we use NIS attributes without killing our domain? The Samba guide even has instructions for using ADUC to set the UID/GID for users and

On 25/06/15 13:44, David Minard wrote: >> On 24/06/15 02:55, David Minard wrote: >>> On 23/06/15 13:32, David Minard wrote: >>> >>>> I've Set up a DC and a Member Server for a file server. Both are >>>> running on Centos7 and samba version 4.2.2. The Member Server is >>>> running smbd and winbindd.

> > Yes, you have got it wrong ;-) :( If you do not want to add anything to AD, then you use the 'rid' > backend and 'ID' numbers will be calculated for you. You will also have > to place 'template' shell & homedir lines in smb.conf > If you want/need some of your users to have different login shells or > home directories, you will need to use the

Thanks Rowland! My current configs are: DC: # Global parameters [global] dns forwarder = 8.8.8.8 netbios name = TESTBOX realm = SAMDOM.TESTING.COM server role = active directory domain controller workgroup = SAMDOM idmap_ldb:use rfc2307 = yes log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log log level = 3 tls enabled = yes vfs

> On Wed, 2 Jan 2019 14:42:39 +0000 > Rob Mason <rob at acasta.co.uk<mailto:rob at acasta.co.uk>>> wrote: > >> Many thanks Rowland. Yes, I don't understand idmaps, but I _think_ >> I'm getting it. I have added the gid of 60002 for Domain Admins and >> undertaken some 'chgrp' tasks. I've now got a domain member with >>

Hello, in my samba NT4 i have some low uid. Rowland Penny suggest to set it higher. So far OK. I config my AD member as followed: # Default ID mapping configuration for local BUILTIN accounts # and groups on a domain member. The default (*) domain: # - must not overlap with any domain ID mapping configuration! # - must use an read-write-enabled back end, such as tdb. idmap config * : backend =

Many thanks Rowland. Yes, I don't understand idmaps, but I _think_ I'm getting it. I have added the gid of 60002 for Domain Admins and undertaken some 'chgrp' tasks. I've now got a domain member with shares that presents the correct ownership. All looks good. I'm still slightly confused why I have two ranges within my member smb.conf: idmap config * : backend = tdb

On 15/07/2020 14:27, Douglas G. Oechsler via samba wrote: > Hello! > > I really do not know what to do. Still in error. I did step by step ad-dc > and AD Member file server. > Any other idea please? > > Error: > net rpc rights grant "MYDOMAIN\Unix Admins" SeDiskOperatorPrivilege -U > "MYDOMAIN\Administrator" > Enter MYDOMAIN\Administrator's