similar to: Dropping support for OpenSSL <1.1.1, LibreSSL <3.1.0

On Mon, 2017-10-16 at 17:18 +0200, Ingo Schwarze wrote: > > Fedora has the same policy, and so far has opted to ship a ~3600- > > line > > patch to OpenSSH to use the 1.1 API. > > Frankly, i would feel uncomfortable using OpenSSH on Fedora. Thank you for the support. Do you have any real reason to say so? Yes, we opted to improve existing patch, implement missing parts,

Hi, On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 05:54:52AM -0600, The Doctor wrote: > The best solution is if (LIBRESSL) || (OPENSSL < 1010...) > > Else > > Whatever. > > Is that too much work? Littering code with #ifdef is almost never a good idea. gert -- USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW! //www.muc.de/~gert/ Gert

So far Openssh and Openssl Alpha are working. -- Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism We ascribe to others what we know of ourselves. -unknown

So far on FreeBSD 11.1 reject openssl 1.1.0 make with Openssl 1.0.2 l no issues Attempt to test in openssl 1.0.2m -dev -fips chokes on tests. -- Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism Talk

This might be trivial or not. I have a customer access his e-mail via POP3 using multiple devs. I recommend they switch to IMAP , however, How can the POP3 locking be made into a non-issue? -- Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!

Got a client that usually uses Outlook I think 2010. This person tends to move their e-mails to certain folers. On Thunderbird, the move shows. Not on Outlook. Any explanation? -- Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b A

On Sun, Sep 20, 2020 at 03:13:28PM -0400, Randall S. Becker wrote: > On September 20, 2020 2:02 AM, Damien Miller wrote: > > OpenSSH 8.4p1 is almost ready for release, so we would appreciate testing > > on as many platforms and systems as possible. This is a bugfix release. > > I will be testing this shortly on HPE NonStop platforms. > > Side question: We now have

Hello Ingo, On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 1:26 AM, Ingo Schwarze <schwarze at usta.de> wrote: > > Hi Emmanuel, > > Emmanuel Deloget wrote on Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 12:26:47AM +0200: > > > * the openssl team has no real incentive to propose a shim ; > > If major application projects refuse to support their new release, > thus putting pressure on operating system

Is 2 factor authentication possible on dovecot? -- Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b New Brunswick Save The PRovince Vote Liberal 14 Sept!!

Anyone trying openssl 3 against openssh? -- Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Put more trust in nobility of character than in an oath. -Solon

Howdy, I'm attempting to compile openssh-7.1p1 using libressl-2.2.4 for the ssl implementation. Unfortunately, this fails to work (tested on Debian Unstable and Gentoo): cd libressl-2.2.4 ./configure --prefix=/opt/libressl-2.2.4 && make -j8 && sudo make install cd ../openssh-7.1p1 ./configure --with-ssl-dir=/opt/libressl-2.2.4 fails with: checking OpenSSL header version...

On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 5:35 PM, Darren Tucker <dtucker at zip.com.au> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 9:22 AM, Austin English <austinenglish at gmail.com> wrote: >> Howdy, >> >> I'm attempting to compile openssh-7.1p1 using libressl-2.2.4 for the >> ssl implementation. Unfortunately, this fails to work (tested on >> Debian Unstable and Gentoo):

On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 11:18:45PM +0300, Odhiambo Washington via dovecot wrote: > On Tue, 5 Feb 2019 at 20:32, Aki Tuomi via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> > wrote: > > > Due to DMARC issues some people have failed to receive the latest security > > information, so here it is repeated for both releases: > > > > 2.3.4.1 > > > >

On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 11:18:45PM +0300, Odhiambo Washington via dovecot wrote: > On Tue, 5 Feb 2019 at 20:32, Aki Tuomi via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> > wrote: > > > Due to DMARC issues some people have failed to receive the latest security > > information, so here it is repeated for both releases: > > > > 2.3.4.1 > > > >

On Friday 06 April 2018 21:31:01 Bernard Spil wrote: > Hi, > > When using OpenSSH with LibreSSL 2.7.x it cannot read existing RSA and > ECDSA private keys. > > Error loading key "./id_rsa": invalid format > > Rebuilding OpenSSH with LibreSSL 2.6.x fixes the issue. I had fixed this > issue early on with LibreSSL 2.7 by converting the key to "new

On 2018-04-07 11:24, Bernard Spil wrote: > On 2018-04-07 9:04, Joel Sing wrote: >> On Friday 06 April 2018 21:31:01 Bernard Spil wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> When using OpenSSH with LibreSSL 2.7.x it cannot read existing RSA >>> and >>> ECDSA private keys. >>> >>> Error loading key "./id_rsa": invalid format

Hi, Yesterday I tried to replace the system openssl in a gentoo system with libressl. With openssh an interesting issue popped up: * RAND_bytes in libressl calls arc4random * arc4random is a compat function both in openssh and libressl * arc4random from openssh uses RAND_bytes So what's happening is a recursion. arc4random wants to use RAND_bytes and RAND_bytes wants to use arc4random. The

On Wed, 27 Sep 2017, Martin Hecht wrote: > all tests passed on > > Ubuntu 16.04.3 LTS and > Scientific Linux release 6.9 (Carbon) > > On SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 11 SP3 LTSS I had to provide a local > installation of a newer openssl. I have chosen their current LTS version > 1.0.2l with shared library support enabled, and I had to tweak with > CFLAGS and LDFLAGS

On Thu, Mar 07, 2024 at 05:07:49PM +1100, Darren Tucker wrote: > On Thu, 7 Mar 2024 at 14:54, The Doctor <doctor at doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote: > [...] > > /usr/local/bin/openssl version -a > > ld-elf.so.1: /usr/lib/libssl.so.3: version OPENSSL_3.2.0 required by /usr/local/bin/openssl not found > > This is why configure (with the patch) didn't use that openssl

pull the patches from the port..... On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 2:28 PM Odhiambo Washington via dovecot < dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote: > Oh, so manual compile should NOT work and it's okay or am I missing > something? > > On Tue, 5 Feb 2019 at 23:26, The Doctor <doctor at doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote: > >> On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 11:18:45PM +0300, Odhiambo